INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

THE FUTURE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN THE AGE OF STAKEHOLDER CAPITALISM BY - GAUTHAM A B, TIMNA BRIJIT TENNISON, RESHMA R & PRIYAMOL C P

Authors: GAUTHAM A B, TIMNA BRIJIT TENNISON, RESHMA R & PRIYAMOL C P

Registration ID: 108469 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8469, IJLRA8470, IJLRA8471 & IJLRA8472

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: chinnuprasanna1996@gmail.com, thecookbook304@gmail.com, malayalipwoliyada0@gmail.com & seenaps866@gmail.com

Page No : 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-86684186/THE FUTURE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN THE AGE OF S

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DOCTRINE OF PUBLIC POLICY IN ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS IN INDIA AND THE UNITED KINGDOM BY - MAUSAM KUMAR

Authors: MAUSAM KUMAR

Registration ID: 108468 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8468

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: mausamk21@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-84288466/COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DOCTRINE OF PUBLIC POLICY IN

REFUGEE RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW: CHALLENGES IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD BY - AAYAT MOHD RAISH KHAN & KULDEEP B MALUSARE

Authors: AAYAT MOHD RAISH KHAN & KULDEEP B MALUSARE

Registration ID: 108467 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8467 & IJLRA8477

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: aayatkhan05022@gmail.com & kuldeep0315@gmail.com

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-44715632/REFUGEE RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW:

"SECULAR LAWS AT LOGGERHEADS WITH PERSONAL LAWS: THE TUG OF WAR IN INDIAN JURISPRUDENCE" BY - ARPITA JAIN

Authors: ARPITA JAIN

Registration ID: 108466 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8466

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: jainarpita260@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-38728279/SECULAR LAWS AT LOGGERHEADS WITH PERSONAL LAWS: TH

DIGITAL SIGNATURES – LEGAL RECOGNITION, APPLICABILITY AND CHALLENGES UNDER THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 BY - HITEN LAKHANI & ADITYA SHARMA

Authors: HITEN LAKHANI & ADITYA SHARMA

Registration ID: 108464 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8464 & IJLRA8465

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: hitenlakhani.work@gmail.com & adityasharmaclc@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-88139599/DIGITAL SIGNATURES – LEGAL RECOGNITION, APPLICAB

ENSURING ACCOUNTABILITY: THE IMPACT OF SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FOURTH BRANCH INSTITUTIONS BY - KUMAIL FATIMA

Authors: KUMAIL FATIMA

Registration ID: 108463 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8463

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: fatima19kumail@gmail.com

Page No : 19 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-22256679/ENSURING ACCOUNTABILITY: THE IMPACT OF SEPARATION

HINDU PERSONAL LAWS AND RIGHTS OF WOMEN IN INDIA BY - ADVOCATE SIMRAN VEER & DR. MANJU SINGH VEER

Authors: ADVOCATE SIMRAN VEER & DR. MANJU SINGH VEER

Registration ID: 108461 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8461 & IJLRA8462

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: advsimranveer@gmail.com & manjusinghveer66@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-58292387/HINDU PERSONAL LAWS AND RIGHTS OF WOMEN IN INDIA

IMPLEMENTATION OF PROTECTIONISM THEORY IN INDIA AND ITS IMPACT ON THE ECONOMY BY - KOUSIKA MV

Authors: KOUSIKA MV

Registration ID: 108460 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8460

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: kousika.vishwa08@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-77918859/IMPLEMENTATION OF PROTECTIONISM THEORY IN INDIA AN

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AS A CATALYST FOR INNOVATION: INSIGHTS FROM EMERGING MARKETS BY - SANIKA JAVDEKAR

Authors: SANIKA JAVDEKAR

Registration ID: 108459 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8459

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: javdekarsanika007@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-76564831/CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AS A CATALYST FOR

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FUNDAMENTALISM: DEVELOPED VIS A VIS DEVELOPING COUNTRIES BY - DR. SUKRITI YAGYASEN,

Authors: DR. SUKRITI YAGYASEN

Registration ID: 108458 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8458

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: sukritiy@gmail.com

Page No : 22 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-31643732/INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FUNDAMENTALISM: DEVELOPED VI

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1]Klemash, S., Smith, J. C., & Doyle, R. (2019, June 13). Stakeholder capitalism for long-term value creation (Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance). Retrieved from https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/06/13/stakeholder-capitalism-for-long-term-value-creation/

[2]Alexander, F., Ensign-Barstow, H., & Palladino, L. (2020, October 26). From shareholder primacy to stakeholder capitalism (Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance). Retrieved from https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/10/26/from-shareholder-primacy-to-stakeholder-capitalism/

[3] KKS Advisors, & TCP. (2020, October 24). COVID-19 and inequality: A test of corporate purpose. KKS Advisors. Retrieved from https://www.kksadvisors.com/tcp-test-of-corporate-purpose-september2020

[1] A.S.Akoto., ‘Public policy: An amorphous concept in the enforcement of arbitral awards’ (2020) (7) (1) Journal of Liberty and International Affairs p.56 available at https://heinonline-org.eresources.nls.ac.in/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/jlia7&i=51. accessed 16 September 2023.

[2] Y. Dubey, ‘Analysis of Public Policy and Enforcement of Domestic and Foreign Arbitral Awards in India’ (2018) (7) (2) Christ University Law Journal available at https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/chulj7&i=195 accessed 17 September 2023.

[3] Anirudh Hariani, ‘Indian arbitration and the shifting sands of public policy’ (2020) (16) (2) Asian International Arbitration Journal p.171 available at https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Asian+International+Arbitration+Journal/16.2/AIAJ2020020. accessed 16 September 2023.

[4] Tariq Khan, 'Whether to Invest or not: Comparative Analysis of the Public Policy Doctrine in India and England' (2021) 8 (1) RGNUL Financial & Mercantile Law Review pp. 39 available at https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/rlfladme8&i=47 accessed 15 September 2023.

[5]Tariq Khan, 'Whether to Invest or not: Comparative Analysis of the Public Policy Doctrine in India and England' (2021) 8 (1) RGNUL Financial & Mercantile Law Review pp. 39 available at https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/rlfladme8&i=47 accessed 15 September 2023.

[6] A J van den Berg, ‘The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958: Towards a Uniform Judicial Interpretation’, (1981) p. 360.

[7] Harpreet Kaur, ‘The 1996 Arbitration and Conciliation Act: A Step Toward Improving Arbitration in India’, (2010) (6) (1) Hastings Business Law Journal pp. 262-263 available at https://repository.uclawsf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1146&context=hastings_business_law_journal accessed on 17 September 2023

[8] Travaux pre?paratoires, ‘Report of the Committee on the Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards’, (2016) pp. 20-21 & 23 available at https://newyorkconvention1958.org/pdf/guide/2016_Guide_on_the_NY_Convention.pdf#page=251 accessed 17 September 2023.

[9] J. Gillis Wetter, ‘Present Status of the International Court of Arbitration of the ICC: An Appraisal’, (1990) (1) (1) The American Review of International Arbitration pp. 91-93.

[10] Tariq Khan, 'Whether to Invest or not: Comparative Analysis of the Public Policy Doctrine in India and England' (2021) 8 RGNUL Fin & Mercantile L Rev 35 (SCC ONLINE)

[12] Soinco SACI & Anr. v. Novokuznetsk Aluminium Plant & Ors., [1998] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 337, Court of Appeal, England and Wales [1998] CLC 730.

[13] Sonatrach (Algeria) v. Distrigas Corp, (United States District Court) Massachusetts (1995) XX Y.B. Comm Arb at 795.

[14] The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 92 S. Ct. 1907 (1972).

[15] Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co., 417 US 506 (1974).

[16] Mitsubishi v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, 473 U.S. 614 (1985).

[17] Dutch Seller v. German Buyer, (1987) XII Y.B. Comm. Arb.at 489.

[18] SA Laboratories Eurosilicone v. Societe Bez Medizintechnik GmbH (2004) Revue deI’Arbitrage 133.

[19] Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co., 1994 Supp (1) SCC 644.

[20] Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd., (2003) 5 SCC 705.

[21] Phulchand Exports Ltd. v. OOO Patriot, (2011) 10 SCC 300.

[22] Shri Lal Mahal Ltd. v. Progetto Grano Spa, (2014) 2 SCC 433.

[23] Law Commission of India, Report No. 246 on Amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Aug. 2014)

[24] Associate Builders v. Delhi Development Authority, 2014 SCC OnLine SC 937.

[25] Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. v. National Highways Authority of India, 2019 SCC OnLine SC 677.

[26] Vijay Karia & Ors. v. Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi SRL & Ors., 2020 SCC Online SC 177.

[27] National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India v. Alimenta S.A., 2020 SCC OnLine SC 381.

[29] Westacre Investment Inc. v. Jugoimport SDPR Holding Company Ltd and ors. [2000] QB 288

[32] RBRG Trading (UK) Limited v. Sinocore International Co. Ltd. [2018] EWCA Civ 838.

[1] Chetan Kumar**. (2018). “The Role of the Supreme Court in the Protection of Refugee Rights in India: A Critical Assessment.” *Indian Journal of Constitutional Law*, 10(1), 25-56.

[2] National Human Rights Commission v. State of Arunachal Pradesh**. (1996). AIR 1996 SC 1234.

[3] Lauterpacht, E., C Bethlehem, D.** (2003). “The Scope and Content of the Principle of Non- Refoulement: Opinion.” *International Journal of Refugee Law*, 15(2), 235-249.

[4] United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)**. (2011). “Handbook and Guidelines on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status.” UNHCR.

[5] Feller, E.** (2008). “Refugees and the Rule of Law.” *International Journal of Refugee Law*, 20(2), 171- 195.

[6] Zetter, R.** (2018). “More than Protection: A Development Perspective on Refugee Rights.” *International Journal of Refugee Law*, 30(1), 1-20.

[7] Hussain v. Union of India**. (2015). W.P.(C) No. 167/2015.

Mohammed Salimullah v. Union of India**. (2017). W.P.(C) No. 1099/2017.

[8] Amnesty International India v. Union of India**. (2020). W.P.(C) No. 1311/2020.

[9] Buchanan, A., C Keohane, R. O. (Eds.) (2006). The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations.

[10] Bhabha, J.** (2014). “The Challenge of Refugee Protection in a Globalized World.” *Harvard International Law Journal*, 55(2), 451-487.

^{^[2]} Smt. Sarla Mudgal, President, Kalyani & ... vs Union Of India & Ors 995 AIR 1531

^{^[3]} Mohd. Ahmed Khan vs Shah Bano Begum And Ors 1985 AIR 945

^{^[4]} Danial Latifi & Anr vs Union Of India AIR 2001 SC 3958

^{^[6]} Mary Roy V. The State Of Kerala 1986 AIR 1011, 1986 Scr (1) 371

^{^[8]} Smt. Sarla Mudgal, President, Kalyani & ... vs Union Of India & Ors 995 AIR 1531

[1] Subodh Asthana, All You Want to Know about Digital & Electronic Signature - iPleaders, Key Highlights (June 21, 2019), https://blog.ipleaders.in/digital-electronic-signature/.

[2] Archana Balasubramanian, Digital Signature And Electronic Signature - Legal Framework, IT and Internet (June 24, 2021), https://www.mondaq.com/india/it-and-internet/1083500/digital-signature-and-electronic-signature-legal- framework.

[4] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 2(1)(ta)

[5] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 2(1)(p)

[7] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 3

[8] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 5

[9] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 35

[12] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 24(1)

[17] Subodh Asthana, All You Want to Know about Digital & Electronic Signature - iPleaders, Key highlights (June 21, 2019), https://blog.ipleaders.in/digital-electronic-signature/.

[18] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 35

[19] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 23

[22] Trimex International Fze Ltd. v. Vedanta Aluminum Ltd. (2010)

[23] State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai (2003)

^{^[1]}Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws (Edited by Anne M. Cohler, Basia Carolyn Miller, and Harold Samuel Stone) (Cambridge University Press, 1989)

^{^[2]}Christoph Möllers, The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers (OUP 2015) 16-49, 110-126.

^{^[3]} John Locke, Two Treatises of Government (Edited by Peter Laslett) (Broadview Press, 2003).

^{^[4]} Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract (Edited by Maurice Cranston) (Penguin Classics, 1987).

^{^[5]} Ram Jawaya v State of Punjab [1955] 2 SCR 225, AIR 1955 SC 549.

^{^[6]} Keshavananda Bharti v Union of India [1973] 4 SCC 225, AIR 1973 SC 1461.

^{^[7]} Indira Gandhi Nehru v. Raj Narain [1975] 2 SCC 159 AIR 1975.

^{^[8]} N Kannadasan v Ajoy Khose & Ors [2009] AIR 2009 SC 178

^{^[9]} Supreme Court Advocates-on-record Association & Anr v Union of India (2016) 5 SCC 1, (2016) 2 SCC (LS) 253.

^{^[10]} Peter Gerangelos, The Separation of Powers and Legislative Interference in Judicial Process: Constitutional Principles and Limitations (Hart Publishing, 2006).

^{^[11]} Tarunabh Khaitan, 'Guarantor Institutions' (2021) Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

^{^[12]} Mark Tushnet, ‘Institutions Supporting Constitutional Democracy: Some Conceptual Issues’ (2016) 49(3) Constitutional Commentary 689

^{^[13]} Cheryl Saunders, The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and the Fourth Branch (1993) 72 Colum. L. Rev. 573.

^{^[14]} Cheryl Saunders, The Paradox of Independence: Separation of Powers and the Judiciary’s Review of Agency Action (1985) 34 Buff. L. Rev. 683.

^{^[15]} Gisela Sin, Separation of Powers and Legislative Organization: The President, the Senate, and Political Parties in the Making of House Rules (Cambridge University Press, 1998).

^{^[16]} Hayek, F A, The Constitution of Liberty (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1960) ch 12.

[1] Vishaka and Ors v State of Rajasthan AIR 1997 SC 3011.

[3] The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 (39 of 2005).

[4] The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (25 of 1986).

[6] The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 (26 of 1937).

[7] The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of 1961).

[8] The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005).

[9] Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (14 of 2013).

[10] Aditya Mukherjee, ‘Empire: How Colonial India Made Modern Britain’ (2010) 45(50) Economic and Political Weekly 11-17 accessed 7 April 2024.

[11] The Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 (3 of 1936).

[12] The Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 (15 of 1872).

[15] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (25 of 1955) s 5.

[16] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (25 of 1955) s 7.

[17] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (25 of 1955) s 12.

[18] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (25 of 1955) s 24.

[19] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (25 of 1955) s 25.

[1] Author- Sanika Javdekar, PRN- 1182200135, Div- B, 5^th Year, MIT-WPU, SCHOOL OF LAW

[2] Ejiro Ejoh and Patrick A. Omoile, “Corporate Social Responsibility on Innovation and Creativity in Workplace”, (November 2023), Research Gate,

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377252455_Corporate_Social_Responsibility_on_Innovation_and_Creativity_in_the_Workplace

[3] Jason Fernando, “What is CSR? Corporate Social Responsibility Explained” (March 06, 2024), Investopedia, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/corp-social-responsibility.asp

[5] Ejiro Ejoh and Patrick A. Omoile, “Corporate Social Responsibility on Innovation and Creativity in Workplace”, (November 2023), Research Gate,

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377252455_Corporate_Social_Responsibility_on_Innovation_and_Creativity_in_the_Workplace

[6] Luca Collina, Mostafa Sayyadi, Micheal Provitera, “Corporate Social Innovation: The Convergence of Business Innovation and Social Good”, (12^th December, 2023), https://cmr.berkeley.edu/2023/12/corporate-social-innovation-the-convergence-of-business-innovation-and-social-good/

[7] Ejiro Ejoh and Patrick A. Omoile, “Corporate Social Responsibility on Innovation and Creativity in Workplace”, (November 2023), Research Gate,

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377252455_Corporate_Social_Responsibility_on_Innovation_and_Creativity_in_the_Workplace

[1] Severe pressure has been exerted on developing countries to adopt strict IPR protection regimes that are similar or even stronger to the regimes practiced in developed countries by way of Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and multilateral agreements like the ACTA.

[2] Dutfield, G, ‘To copy is to steal: TRIPS, (un)free trade agreements and the new intellectual property fundamentalism’, available at: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/2006_1/dutfield/ dutfield.pdf, accessed on 27/03/2020.

[4] X. Li, ‘WCO SECURE: Lessons Learnt from the Abortion of the TRIPS-plus-plus IP Enforcement Initiative’ (South Centre, December 2008) ix, available at: http://www.iadb.org/intal/intalcdi/ PE/2009/03830.pdf, accessed on 12/03/2020

[5] World Bank, ‘Global Economic Prospects and the Developing Countries 2002’ quoted in, Dutfield.

[6] Justice L. Harms, ‘The Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights by means of Criminal Sanctions: An Assessment’ (WIPO Advisory Committee on Enforcement, 2007) 9, available at: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_4/wipo_ace_4_3.doc, accessed on 10/01/2021

[7] Endeshaw, Assafa, ‘Intellectual Property Enforcement in Asia: A Reality Check’ (2005) 13 Int’l J.L. & Info. Tech 378.

[8] Wei Shi, ‘The Paradox of Confucian Determinism: Tracking the Root Cause of Intellectual Property Rights Problem in China’ (2008) 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 454 at 458.

[9] Christopher Wolfe, ‘Natural Law and Liberalism: Can this Marriage be Saved?’, available at: www.isi.org/lectures/text/pdf/wolfe.pdf, accessed on 11/03/2020.

[12] John Locke, Two Treatises of Government (edited by Peter Laslett, Cambridge University Press, 1988) 287-288, also see John Locke, Essays on the Law of Nature, Edited by W. von Leyden, (Oxford at the Clarendon Press) 25-29.

[14] In the United Kingdom significant contributions were made subsequent to the Scottish enlightenment in the eighteenth century by David Hume, Thomas Reid and Adam Smith. In Continental Europe the writings of Voltaire and Immanuel Kant have played a key role in the development of liberalism. In the United States noticeable contributions have been made by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay after the American Revolution.

[15] Wei Shi, ‘Cultural Perplexity in Intellectual Property: Is Stealing a Book an Elegant Offence?’ (2006-2007) 32 N.C.J Int’l L. & Com. Reg. 9.

[16] Arthur Wineburg, ‘Jurisprudence in Asia: Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights’ 5 University of Baltimore Intellectual Property Law Journal 25.

[18] John Allison & Lianlian Lin, ‘The Evolution of Chinese Attitudes towards Property Rights Invention and Discovery’ (1999) 20 U. PA. J. Int’l Econ L. 742.

[19] Kenneth Ho, ‘A Study into the Problem of Software Piracy in Hong Kong and China’ (Intellectual Property Department, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region), available at: http://www.ipd.gov.hk/eng/intellectual_property/study_aids/piracy_hk_china_copyrt/ piracy_hk_chin a_c.htm#2.1, accessed on 12/03/2020.

[22] Steven Cory, The Spirit of Truth and the Spirit of Error 2 (Moody Bible Institute of Chicago, Moody Press, 1986) 56.

[23] J. Freitas Santos and J. Cadima Ribeiro, ‘An Investigation of the Relationship Between Counterfeiting and Culture: Evidence from the European Union’ EURAM 2006, quoted in, Justice Harms Justice Harms, Louis, “The Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights by means of Criminal Sanctions: An Assessment”, WIPO Advisory Committee on Enforcement 2007, available at: www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/.../wipo_ace_4_3.doc, accessed on 10/01/2021.

[24] Feinberg, Joel, Harm to Self (Oxford University Press, 1986).

[25] Rinne Swinyard and Kau Keng ‘The Morality of Software Piracy: Across-Cultural Analysis’ (1990) Journal of Business Ethics 655.

[26] Endeshaw, Assafa, ‘Intellectual Property Enforcement in Asia: A Reality Check’ (2005) 13 Int’l J.L. & Info. Tech 381.

[27] Ostergard, Robert, Development Dilemma: The Political Economy of intellectual Property rights in the International System (LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC, New York 2002).

[31] F. Abbott, ‘The WTO TRIPS Agreement and Global Economic Development’ (1997) Public Policy and Global Technological Integration 3.

[32] Mark Wu, ‘Intellectual Property Rights in Global Trade Framework: IP Trends in Developing Countries’ (2004) 98 Am. Soc’y Int’l. L. Proc. 105

[34] Pengelly, T, ‘Technical Assistance on IPRS for Developing Countries: Some Strategic Policy Issues and Recommendations for Future Priorities for Donors and Developing Countries’ (2003) ICTSD-UNCTAD Dialogue, 2nd Bellagio Series on Development and Intellectual Property 7, available at: http://ictsd.org/i/ip/25558/, accessed on 12/04/2021.

[35] Geoffrey Willard, ‘An Examination of China’s Emerging Intellectual Property Regime: Historical Underpinnings, the Current System and Prospects for the Future’ 6 Indiana International & Comparative L. Rev. 411 at 417.

[37] Robert Weatherley, The discourse of Human Rights in China: Historical and Ideological Perspectives (Palgrave 1999) 104.

[38] Robert Bejesky, ‘Investing on the Dragon: Managing the Patent versus Trade Secret Protection Decision for Multinational Corporation in China’ (2004) 11 TULSA J. Comp. & INT’L L 437.

[39] Weatherley, Robert, The discourse of Human Rights in China: Historical and Ideological Perspectives (Palgrave, 1999).

[40] See, P. Ollier, ‘The End of the Beginning’ (May 2007) 169 Managing Intellectual Property 16, for an elaborate analysis of this dispute.

[42] C. Correa, ‘The Push for Stronger Enforcement Rules: Implications for Developing Countries’ (ICTSD Programme on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development, 2009) 31, available at: http://ictsd.org/downloads/2009/03/fink-correa-web.pdf, accessed on 13/03/2020

[44] Dutfield, G, ‘To copy is to steal: TRIPS, (un)free trade agreements and the new intellectual property fundamentalism’, available at: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/2006_1/dutfield/ dutfield.pdf, accessed on 27/03/2020.

[47] F. Pietrucha, ‘Counterfeiting and Piracy Hurt Real People’ (America.gov-Telling America’s Story, 6th May 2009), available at: http://blogs.america.gov/ip/2009/05/06/counterfeiting-and-piracyhurt- real-people/, accessed on 12/02/2020.

[50] Davey, Neil, ‘The problem with fake foods’ (Food Safety, Business Action to Stop Counterfeiting and Piracy, International Chamber of Commerce), available at: http://www.gdspublishing.com/ic_ pdf/fsa/gds3.pdf, accessed on 07/07/2020.

[51] Mr Obama has sparked anger in the UK by insisting on using BP’s former name – British Petroleum – which was axed back in 1998 and making statements such as, “I want to know whose ‘ass to kick ’ at BP” and that “BP chief executive Tony Hayward should be sacked”.

[52] Mr. Johnson told the BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, “I do think there’s something worrying about the anti-British rhetoric that seems to be permeating from America”.

[53] Lord Tebbit wrote on the dailymail website, “Mr. Obama’s attitude was explicable but despicable”.

[54] Nicola Boden, ‘Cameron at odds with Tories as he refuses to publicly back BP after Tebbit and Boris attack Obama’s ‘anti-British rhetoric’ Mailonline (14 June 2010), available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1285467/BP-OIL-SPILL-Lord-Tebbit-Boris-Johnsonattack Obamas-anti-British-rhetoric.html, accessed on 13/07/2020.

[55] Burkitt, Daniel, ‘Intellectual Property Copyrighting Culture – the History and Cultural Specificity of the Western Model of Copyright’ (2001) I.P.Q. 146.

[56] Dutfield, G, ‘To copy is to steal: TRIPS, (un)free trade agreements and the new intellectual property fundamentalism’, available at: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/2006_1/dutfield/ dutfield.pdf, accessed on 27/03/2020.

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

THE FUTURE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN THE AGE OF STAKEHOLDER CAPITALISM BY - GAUTHAM A B, TIMNA BRIJIT TENNISON, RESHMA R & PRIYAMOL C P

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DOCTRINE OF PUBLIC POLICY IN ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS IN INDIA AND THE UNITED KINGDOM BY - MAUSAM KUMAR

REFUGEE RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW: CHALLENGES IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD BY - AAYAT MOHD RAISH KHAN & KULDEEP B MALUSARE

"SECULAR LAWS AT LOGGERHEADS WITH PERSONAL LAWS: THE TUG OF WAR IN INDIAN JURISPRUDENCE" BY - ARPITA JAIN

DIGITAL SIGNATURES – LEGAL RECOGNITION, APPLICABILITY AND CHALLENGES UNDER THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 BY - HITEN LAKHANI & ADITYA SHARMA

ENSURING ACCOUNTABILITY: THE IMPACT OF SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FOURTH BRANCH INSTITUTIONS BY - KUMAIL FATIMA

HINDU PERSONAL LAWS AND RIGHTS OF WOMEN IN INDIA BY - ADVOCATE SIMRAN VEER & DR. MANJU SINGH VEER

IMPLEMENTATION OF PROTECTIONISM THEORY IN INDIA AND ITS IMPACT ON THE ECONOMY BY - KOUSIKA MV

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AS A CATALYST FOR INNOVATION: INSIGHTS FROM EMERGING MARKETS BY - SANIKA JAVDEKAR

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FUNDAMENTALISM: DEVELOPED VIS A VIS DEVELOPING COUNTRIES BY - DR. SUKRITI YAGYASEN,

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2