INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

"SECULAR LAWS AT LOGGERHEADS WITH PERSONAL LAWS: THE TUG OF WAR IN INDIAN JURISPRUDENCE" BY - ARPITA JAIN

Authors: ARPITA JAIN

Registration ID: 108466 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8466

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: jainarpita260@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-38728279/SECULAR LAWS AT LOGGERHEADS WITH PERSONAL LAWS: TH

DIGITAL SIGNATURES – LEGAL RECOGNITION, APPLICABILITY AND CHALLENGES UNDER THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 BY - HITEN LAKHANI & ADITYA SHARMA

Authors: HITEN LAKHANI & ADITYA SHARMA

Registration ID: 108464 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8464 & IJLRA8465

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: hitenlakhani.work@gmail.com & adityasharmaclc@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-88139599/DIGITAL SIGNATURES – LEGAL RECOGNITION, APPLICAB

ENSURING ACCOUNTABILITY: THE IMPACT OF SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FOURTH BRANCH INSTITUTIONS BY - KUMAIL FATIMA

Authors: KUMAIL FATIMA

Registration ID: 108463 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8463

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: fatima19kumail@gmail.com

Page No : 19 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-22256679/ENSURING ACCOUNTABILITY: THE IMPACT OF SEPARATION

HINDU PERSONAL LAWS AND RIGHTS OF WOMEN IN INDIA BY - ADVOCATE SIMRAN VEER & DR. MANJU SINGH VEER

Authors: ADVOCATE SIMRAN VEER & DR. MANJU SINGH VEER

Registration ID: 108461 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8461 & IJLRA8462

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: advsimranveer@gmail.com & manjusinghveer66@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-58292387/HINDU PERSONAL LAWS AND RIGHTS OF WOMEN IN INDIA

IMPLEMENTATION OF PROTECTIONISM THEORY IN INDIA AND ITS IMPACT ON THE ECONOMY BY - KOUSIKA MV

Authors: KOUSIKA MV

Registration ID: 108460 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8460

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: kousika.vishwa08@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-77918859/IMPLEMENTATION OF PROTECTIONISM THEORY IN INDIA AN

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AS A CATALYST FOR INNOVATION: INSIGHTS FROM EMERGING MARKETS BY - SANIKA JAVDEKAR

Authors: SANIKA JAVDEKAR

Registration ID: 108459 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8459

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: javdekarsanika007@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-76564831/CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AS A CATALYST FOR

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FUNDAMENTALISM: DEVELOPED VIS A VIS DEVELOPING COUNTRIES BY - DR. SUKRITI YAGYASEN,

Authors: DR. SUKRITI YAGYASEN

Registration ID: 108458 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8458

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: sukritiy@gmail.com

Page No : 22 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-31643732/INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FUNDAMENTALISM: DEVELOPED VI

THE EFFECT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW ON ADMINISTRATION ACTION THROUGH WRITS BY - S.S. NEHA SREE

Authors: S.S. NEHA SREE

Registration ID: 108457 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8457

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: nehasree6374@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-55897322/THE EFFECT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW ON ADMINISTRATION AC

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS: A STUDY WITH REFERENCE TO THE USA, UK, AUSTRALIA, SOUTH AFRICA, CANADA AND INDIA BY - S. RAMANA SUBRAMANIAN

Authors: S. RAMANA SUBRAMANIAN

Registration ID: 108456 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8456

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: ramanasivamani.3123@gmail.com

Page No : 20 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-14351193/COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS: A S

GLOBALIZATION AND ITS IMPACT ON HUMAN RIGHTS BY - YATI YADAV

Authors: YATI YADAV

Registration ID: 108455 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8455

Year : Sep -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: yatu.yadav77@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2024-73176652/GLOBALIZATION AND ITS IMPACT ON HUMAN RIGHTS

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

^{^[2]} Smt. Sarla Mudgal, President, Kalyani & ... vs Union Of India & Ors 995 AIR 1531

^{^[3]} Mohd. Ahmed Khan vs Shah Bano Begum And Ors 1985 AIR 945

^{^[4]} Danial Latifi & Anr vs Union Of India AIR 2001 SC 3958

^{^[6]} Mary Roy V. The State Of Kerala 1986 AIR 1011, 1986 Scr (1) 371

^{^[8]} Smt. Sarla Mudgal, President, Kalyani & ... vs Union Of India & Ors 995 AIR 1531

[1] Subodh Asthana, All You Want to Know about Digital & Electronic Signature - iPleaders, Key Highlights (June 21, 2019), https://blog.ipleaders.in/digital-electronic-signature/.

[2] Archana Balasubramanian, Digital Signature And Electronic Signature - Legal Framework, IT and Internet (June 24, 2021), https://www.mondaq.com/india/it-and-internet/1083500/digital-signature-and-electronic-signature-legal- framework.

[4] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 2(1)(ta)

[5] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 2(1)(p)

[7] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 3

[8] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 5

[9] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 35

[12] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 24(1)

[17] Subodh Asthana, All You Want to Know about Digital & Electronic Signature - iPleaders, Key highlights (June 21, 2019), https://blog.ipleaders.in/digital-electronic-signature/.

[18] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 35

[19] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21 of 2000 (India), § 23

[22] Trimex International Fze Ltd. v. Vedanta Aluminum Ltd. (2010)

[23] State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai (2003)

^{^[1]}Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws (Edited by Anne M. Cohler, Basia Carolyn Miller, and Harold Samuel Stone) (Cambridge University Press, 1989)

^{^[2]}Christoph Möllers, The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers (OUP 2015) 16-49, 110-126.

^{^[3]} John Locke, Two Treatises of Government (Edited by Peter Laslett) (Broadview Press, 2003).

^{^[4]} Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract (Edited by Maurice Cranston) (Penguin Classics, 1987).

^{^[5]} Ram Jawaya v State of Punjab [1955] 2 SCR 225, AIR 1955 SC 549.

^{^[6]} Keshavananda Bharti v Union of India [1973] 4 SCC 225, AIR 1973 SC 1461.

^{^[7]} Indira Gandhi Nehru v. Raj Narain [1975] 2 SCC 159 AIR 1975.

^{^[8]} N Kannadasan v Ajoy Khose & Ors [2009] AIR 2009 SC 178

^{^[9]} Supreme Court Advocates-on-record Association & Anr v Union of India (2016) 5 SCC 1, (2016) 2 SCC (LS) 253.

^{^[10]} Peter Gerangelos, The Separation of Powers and Legislative Interference in Judicial Process: Constitutional Principles and Limitations (Hart Publishing, 2006).

^{^[11]} Tarunabh Khaitan, 'Guarantor Institutions' (2021) Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

^{^[12]} Mark Tushnet, ‘Institutions Supporting Constitutional Democracy: Some Conceptual Issues’ (2016) 49(3) Constitutional Commentary 689

^{^[13]} Cheryl Saunders, The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and the Fourth Branch (1993) 72 Colum. L. Rev. 573.

^{^[14]} Cheryl Saunders, The Paradox of Independence: Separation of Powers and the Judiciary’s Review of Agency Action (1985) 34 Buff. L. Rev. 683.

^{^[15]} Gisela Sin, Separation of Powers and Legislative Organization: The President, the Senate, and Political Parties in the Making of House Rules (Cambridge University Press, 1998).

^{^[16]} Hayek, F A, The Constitution of Liberty (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1960) ch 12.

[1] Vishaka and Ors v State of Rajasthan AIR 1997 SC 3011.

[3] The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 (39 of 2005).

[4] The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (25 of 1986).

[6] The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 (26 of 1937).

[7] The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of 1961).

[8] The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005).

[9] Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (14 of 2013).

[10] Aditya Mukherjee, ‘Empire: How Colonial India Made Modern Britain’ (2010) 45(50) Economic and Political Weekly 11-17 accessed 7 April 2024.

[11] The Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 (3 of 1936).

[12] The Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 (15 of 1872).

[15] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (25 of 1955) s 5.

[16] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (25 of 1955) s 7.

[17] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (25 of 1955) s 12.

[18] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (25 of 1955) s 24.

[19] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (25 of 1955) s 25.

[1] Author- Sanika Javdekar, PRN- 1182200135, Div- B, 5^th Year, MIT-WPU, SCHOOL OF LAW

[2] Ejiro Ejoh and Patrick A. Omoile, “Corporate Social Responsibility on Innovation and Creativity in Workplace”, (November 2023), Research Gate,

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377252455_Corporate_Social_Responsibility_on_Innovation_and_Creativity_in_the_Workplace

[3] Jason Fernando, “What is CSR? Corporate Social Responsibility Explained” (March 06, 2024), Investopedia, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/corp-social-responsibility.asp

[5] Ejiro Ejoh and Patrick A. Omoile, “Corporate Social Responsibility on Innovation and Creativity in Workplace”, (November 2023), Research Gate,

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377252455_Corporate_Social_Responsibility_on_Innovation_and_Creativity_in_the_Workplace

[6] Luca Collina, Mostafa Sayyadi, Micheal Provitera, “Corporate Social Innovation: The Convergence of Business Innovation and Social Good”, (12^th December, 2023), https://cmr.berkeley.edu/2023/12/corporate-social-innovation-the-convergence-of-business-innovation-and-social-good/

[7] Ejiro Ejoh and Patrick A. Omoile, “Corporate Social Responsibility on Innovation and Creativity in Workplace”, (November 2023), Research Gate,

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377252455_Corporate_Social_Responsibility_on_Innovation_and_Creativity_in_the_Workplace

[1] Severe pressure has been exerted on developing countries to adopt strict IPR protection regimes that are similar or even stronger to the regimes practiced in developed countries by way of Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and multilateral agreements like the ACTA.

[2] Dutfield, G, ‘To copy is to steal: TRIPS, (un)free trade agreements and the new intellectual property fundamentalism’, available at: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/2006_1/dutfield/ dutfield.pdf, accessed on 27/03/2020.

[4] X. Li, ‘WCO SECURE: Lessons Learnt from the Abortion of the TRIPS-plus-plus IP Enforcement Initiative’ (South Centre, December 2008) ix, available at: http://www.iadb.org/intal/intalcdi/ PE/2009/03830.pdf, accessed on 12/03/2020

[5] World Bank, ‘Global Economic Prospects and the Developing Countries 2002’ quoted in, Dutfield.

[6] Justice L. Harms, ‘The Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights by means of Criminal Sanctions: An Assessment’ (WIPO Advisory Committee on Enforcement, 2007) 9, available at: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_4/wipo_ace_4_3.doc, accessed on 10/01/2021

[7] Endeshaw, Assafa, ‘Intellectual Property Enforcement in Asia: A Reality Check’ (2005) 13 Int’l J.L. & Info. Tech 378.

[8] Wei Shi, ‘The Paradox of Confucian Determinism: Tracking the Root Cause of Intellectual Property Rights Problem in China’ (2008) 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 454 at 458.

[9] Christopher Wolfe, ‘Natural Law and Liberalism: Can this Marriage be Saved?’, available at: www.isi.org/lectures/text/pdf/wolfe.pdf, accessed on 11/03/2020.

[12] John Locke, Two Treatises of Government (edited by Peter Laslett, Cambridge University Press, 1988) 287-288, also see John Locke, Essays on the Law of Nature, Edited by W. von Leyden, (Oxford at the Clarendon Press) 25-29.

[14] In the United Kingdom significant contributions were made subsequent to the Scottish enlightenment in the eighteenth century by David Hume, Thomas Reid and Adam Smith. In Continental Europe the writings of Voltaire and Immanuel Kant have played a key role in the development of liberalism. In the United States noticeable contributions have been made by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay after the American Revolution.

[15] Wei Shi, ‘Cultural Perplexity in Intellectual Property: Is Stealing a Book an Elegant Offence?’ (2006-2007) 32 N.C.J Int’l L. & Com. Reg. 9.

[16] Arthur Wineburg, ‘Jurisprudence in Asia: Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights’ 5 University of Baltimore Intellectual Property Law Journal 25.

[18] John Allison & Lianlian Lin, ‘The Evolution of Chinese Attitudes towards Property Rights Invention and Discovery’ (1999) 20 U. PA. J. Int’l Econ L. 742.

[19] Kenneth Ho, ‘A Study into the Problem of Software Piracy in Hong Kong and China’ (Intellectual Property Department, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region), available at: http://www.ipd.gov.hk/eng/intellectual_property/study_aids/piracy_hk_china_copyrt/ piracy_hk_chin a_c.htm#2.1, accessed on 12/03/2020.

[22] Steven Cory, The Spirit of Truth and the Spirit of Error 2 (Moody Bible Institute of Chicago, Moody Press, 1986) 56.

[23] J. Freitas Santos and J. Cadima Ribeiro, ‘An Investigation of the Relationship Between Counterfeiting and Culture: Evidence from the European Union’ EURAM 2006, quoted in, Justice Harms Justice Harms, Louis, “The Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights by means of Criminal Sanctions: An Assessment”, WIPO Advisory Committee on Enforcement 2007, available at: www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/.../wipo_ace_4_3.doc, accessed on 10/01/2021.

[24] Feinberg, Joel, Harm to Self (Oxford University Press, 1986).

[25] Rinne Swinyard and Kau Keng ‘The Morality of Software Piracy: Across-Cultural Analysis’ (1990) Journal of Business Ethics 655.

[26] Endeshaw, Assafa, ‘Intellectual Property Enforcement in Asia: A Reality Check’ (2005) 13 Int’l J.L. & Info. Tech 381.

[27] Ostergard, Robert, Development Dilemma: The Political Economy of intellectual Property rights in the International System (LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC, New York 2002).

[31] F. Abbott, ‘The WTO TRIPS Agreement and Global Economic Development’ (1997) Public Policy and Global Technological Integration 3.

[32] Mark Wu, ‘Intellectual Property Rights in Global Trade Framework: IP Trends in Developing Countries’ (2004) 98 Am. Soc’y Int’l. L. Proc. 105

[34] Pengelly, T, ‘Technical Assistance on IPRS for Developing Countries: Some Strategic Policy Issues and Recommendations for Future Priorities for Donors and Developing Countries’ (2003) ICTSD-UNCTAD Dialogue, 2nd Bellagio Series on Development and Intellectual Property 7, available at: http://ictsd.org/i/ip/25558/, accessed on 12/04/2021.

[35] Geoffrey Willard, ‘An Examination of China’s Emerging Intellectual Property Regime: Historical Underpinnings, the Current System and Prospects for the Future’ 6 Indiana International & Comparative L. Rev. 411 at 417.

[37] Robert Weatherley, The discourse of Human Rights in China: Historical and Ideological Perspectives (Palgrave 1999) 104.

[38] Robert Bejesky, ‘Investing on the Dragon: Managing the Patent versus Trade Secret Protection Decision for Multinational Corporation in China’ (2004) 11 TULSA J. Comp. & INT’L L 437.

[39] Weatherley, Robert, The discourse of Human Rights in China: Historical and Ideological Perspectives (Palgrave, 1999).

[40] See, P. Ollier, ‘The End of the Beginning’ (May 2007) 169 Managing Intellectual Property 16, for an elaborate analysis of this dispute.

[42] C. Correa, ‘The Push for Stronger Enforcement Rules: Implications for Developing Countries’ (ICTSD Programme on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development, 2009) 31, available at: http://ictsd.org/downloads/2009/03/fink-correa-web.pdf, accessed on 13/03/2020

[44] Dutfield, G, ‘To copy is to steal: TRIPS, (un)free trade agreements and the new intellectual property fundamentalism’, available at: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/2006_1/dutfield/ dutfield.pdf, accessed on 27/03/2020.

[47] F. Pietrucha, ‘Counterfeiting and Piracy Hurt Real People’ (America.gov-Telling America’s Story, 6th May 2009), available at: http://blogs.america.gov/ip/2009/05/06/counterfeiting-and-piracyhurt- real-people/, accessed on 12/02/2020.

[50] Davey, Neil, ‘The problem with fake foods’ (Food Safety, Business Action to Stop Counterfeiting and Piracy, International Chamber of Commerce), available at: http://www.gdspublishing.com/ic_ pdf/fsa/gds3.pdf, accessed on 07/07/2020.

[51] Mr Obama has sparked anger in the UK by insisting on using BP’s former name – British Petroleum – which was axed back in 1998 and making statements such as, “I want to know whose ‘ass to kick ’ at BP” and that “BP chief executive Tony Hayward should be sacked”.

[52] Mr. Johnson told the BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, “I do think there’s something worrying about the anti-British rhetoric that seems to be permeating from America”.

[53] Lord Tebbit wrote on the dailymail website, “Mr. Obama’s attitude was explicable but despicable”.

[54] Nicola Boden, ‘Cameron at odds with Tories as he refuses to publicly back BP after Tebbit and Boris attack Obama’s ‘anti-British rhetoric’ Mailonline (14 June 2010), available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1285467/BP-OIL-SPILL-Lord-Tebbit-Boris-Johnsonattack Obamas-anti-British-rhetoric.html, accessed on 13/07/2020.

[55] Burkitt, Daniel, ‘Intellectual Property Copyrighting Culture – the History and Cultural Specificity of the Western Model of Copyright’ (2001) I.P.Q. 146.

[56] Dutfield, G, ‘To copy is to steal: TRIPS, (un)free trade agreements and the new intellectual property fundamentalism’, available at: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/2006_1/dutfield/ dutfield.pdf, accessed on 27/03/2020.

[3] R.k.Jain v Union of India (1993) 4SCC 119(168)

[4] (1980)3 SCC 625(677-78):AIR 1980 SC 1789 ( 1925-26)

[5] C.K.Takwani. Lecture On Administrative Law., Third Edition

[7] Prof. I. P. Massey, Administrative Law, pp.62, 8th edition.

[8] Basappa v. Nagappa, AIR 1954 SC 440; (1951) 1 SCR 250.

[11] State of Bihar v. Subhash Singh, AIR 1997 SC 1390 and N.R. Nair v. Union of India, AIR 2001 SC 2337.

[12] Minerva Mills v. Union of India, (1980) 3 SCC 625.

[13] Federation of Railway officers Association C others v. Union of India, AIR 2003 SC 1344.

[14] Noble Resources Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa, AIR 2007 SC 119.

[15] Council of Civil Service Union v. Minister of Civil Service (1984).

[16] Associated Provincial Picture House v. Wednesbury (1947).

[17] Ridge v Baldwin (1963). https://www.questjournals.org

[20] Regina v. Liverpool Corporation ex parte Liverpool Taxi Fleet Operators Association (1972)

[22] Five types of writs https://mcrhrdi.gov.in/splfc2023/week9/2-%20%20Presentation%20-

%20%20Judicial%20Review%20of%20Administrative%20Action%20in%20India.pdf

[23] T.K.Rangarajan v. Government of T.N., AIR 2003 SC 3032; L.Chandra Kumar v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 112.

[1] LLM Student – Manav Rachna University, Faridabad

[2] Kofi Annan, United Nations Secretary-General

[3] Shalmali Guttal, ‘Globalisation’ (2007) 17(4/5) Development in Practice

[4] UNGA Res 55/102 Globalization and its impact on the Full Enjoyment of All Human Rights (2000)

[5] Santosh Kumar M Katke, ‘Globalisation and Human Rights: An overview of its Impact’ (2018) 5(4) IJRAR accessed on October 14 2023

[6] S. K. Kapoor, International Law and Human Rights (17th edn, Central Law Agency 2009) 817

[7] Amartish Kaur, ‘Protection of Human Rights in India: A Review’ (2017) 2(1) Jamia Law Journal

[8] Orissa Mining Corp. ltd. v. Ministry of Environment & Forest (2013) 6 SCC 476

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

"SECULAR LAWS AT LOGGERHEADS WITH PERSONAL LAWS: THE TUG OF WAR IN INDIAN JURISPRUDENCE" BY - ARPITA JAIN

DIGITAL SIGNATURES – LEGAL RECOGNITION, APPLICABILITY AND CHALLENGES UNDER THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 BY - HITEN LAKHANI & ADITYA SHARMA

ENSURING ACCOUNTABILITY: THE IMPACT OF SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FOURTH BRANCH INSTITUTIONS BY - KUMAIL FATIMA

HINDU PERSONAL LAWS AND RIGHTS OF WOMEN IN INDIA BY - ADVOCATE SIMRAN VEER & DR. MANJU SINGH VEER

IMPLEMENTATION OF PROTECTIONISM THEORY IN INDIA AND ITS IMPACT ON THE ECONOMY BY - KOUSIKA MV

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AS A CATALYST FOR INNOVATION: INSIGHTS FROM EMERGING MARKETS BY - SANIKA JAVDEKAR

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FUNDAMENTALISM: DEVELOPED VIS A VIS DEVELOPING COUNTRIES BY - DR. SUKRITI YAGYASEN,

THE EFFECT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW ON ADMINISTRATION ACTION THROUGH WRITS BY - S.S. NEHA SREE

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS: A STUDY WITH REFERENCE TO THE USA, UK, AUSTRALIA, SOUTH AFRICA, CANADA AND INDIA BY - S. RAMANA SUBRAMANIAN

GLOBALIZATION AND ITS IMPACT ON HUMAN RIGHTS BY - YATI YADAV

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2