ARTICLE 36 AND ICJ JURISDICTION: MAPPING THE TERRAIN OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION BY - VEDANSH SHARMA

Authors : VEDANSH SHARMA

Registration ID : 108115 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8115

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : ved.mps@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-41414817/ARTICLE 36 AND ICJ JURISDICTION: MAPPING THE TERRA

THE HISTORICAL AND THE PRESENT ARCHIETURE OF THE INDIAN JUDICIARY BY - MAANYA JAIN

Authors : MAANYA JAIN

Registration ID : 108114 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8114

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : jainmaanya03@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-91458318/THE HISTORICAL AND THE PRESENT ARCHIETURE OF THE I

THE ARMED FORCES (SPECIAL POWERS) ACT, 1958: VIOLENCE BECAME THE WAY OF LIFE BY - SWINI

Authors : SWINI

Registration ID : 108113 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8113

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : swinipunia20@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-71282346/THE ARMED FORCES (SPECIAL POWERS) ACT, 1958: VIOLE

LAW AN EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS COMMENT ON SAVIGNY BY - RAMANDEEP KAUR

Authors : RAMANDEEP KAUR

Registration ID : 108112 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8112

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : d.raman17@yahoo.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-79993966/LAW AN EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS COMMENT ON SAVIGNY

FROM PROMISE TO PRACTICE: UNPACKING INDIAS RIGHT TO EDUCATION ACT, 2009 BY - JAYDEEP FINDORIA

Authors : JAYDEEP FINDORIA

Registration ID : 108111 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8111

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : jaydeepfindoria2510@gmail.com

Page No : 9 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-88473627/FROM PROMISE TO PRACTICE: UNPACKING INDIAS RIGHT T

THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE FASHION INDUSTRY BY - MANIK PAHUJA

Authors : MANIK PAHUJA

Registration ID : 108110 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8110

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : manikpahuja2002@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-23352719/THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE FA

ECONOMIC ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE BY- ASHOK KUMAR TIWARI & PROFF. (DR.) CHANDRASHEKHAR

Authors : ASHOK KUMAR TIWARI & PROFF. (DR.) CHANDRASHEKHAR

Registration ID : 108108 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8108 & IJLRA8109

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : tiwariashok73@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-16691173/ECONOMIC ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ARBITRATI

“ROOT CAUSES OF CUSTOMARY PRACTICES OF VIRGINITY TESTING IN INDIA AND AFRICA” BY - MADHURI TULSHIRAM GANGURDE & DR. ADV HARITA SHINDE BANGALI

Authors : MADHURI TULSHIRAM GANGURDE & DR. ADV HARITA SHINDE BANGALI

Registration ID : 108107 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8106 & IJLRA8107

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : madhurigangurde28@gmail.com & haritashinde@gmail.com

Page No : 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-47934782/ROOT CAUSES OF CUSTOMARY PRACTICES OF VIRGINITY TE

FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND PUBLIC FUNCTIONARIES: A SOCIO-LEGAL CRITIQUE OF KAUSHAL KISHORE V. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (2023) BY - LOKESH MITTAL & SANIGHDHA

Authors : LOKESH MITTAL & SANIGHDHA

Registration ID : 108104 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8104 & IJLRA8105

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : SN201918@GMAIL.COM & SN201918@GMAIL.COM

Page No : 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-64681519/FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND PUBLIC FUNCTIONARIES: A SOCI

SCOPE OF NEUROSCIENCE BEYOND DETERMINING RESPONSIBILITY: LEGALITY AND RESPONSIBILITY OF BRAIN IMPLANTS BY - ARCHANA VISWANATH

Authors : ARCHANA VISWANATH

Registration ID : 108103 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8103

Year :July-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : archanaviswanath12@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-76717895/SCOPE OF NEUROSCIENCE BEYOND DETERMINING RESPONSIB

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] Author is a Doctoral (Ph.D.) Research Scholar of Law at Sardar Patel University of Police, Security and Criminal Justice, Jodhpur.

[3] http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/, last visited on January 26^th, 2024.

[4] Shahabudden, M. Precedent in the World Court, Cambridge, 1996, pp. 22

[5] Chapter XIV, Charter of United Nations. 1945.

[6] Art.3, The Statute of International Court of Justice. 1945.

[7] Art. 4 & 5. The Statute of International Court of Justice. 1945.

[8] Rosenne, ‘The Composition of the Court’ in Gross, Future of the International Court of Justice. Vol. 1. pp. 377.

[9] Art. 39, The Statute of International Court of Justice. 1945.

[10] Art. 34, Statute of International Court of Justice. 1945.

[11] Fisheries Jurisdiction case. ICJ Reports. 1974. pp. 3, 19; 55 ILR, pp. 238, 254.

[12] Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons. ICJ Reports. 1996, pp. 226-237.

[13] The Lockerbie case. ICJ Reports. 1992. pp. 3, 26; 94 ILR, pp. 478, 509.

[17] Cameroon v. Nigeria (Provisional Measures). ICJ Reports. 1996, pp. 13–22.

[18] Nuclear Tests case. ICJ Reports. 1974, pp. 253, 270–1; 57 ILR, pp. 398, 415–16.

[20] Interpretation of Peace Treaties case. ICJ Reports. 1950, pp. 65, 74; 17 ILR, pp. 331, 336.

[21] El Salvador/Honduras. ICJ Reports. 1992, pp. 351, 555; 97 ILR, p. 112.

[22] Article 40(1). Statute of International Court of Justice. 1945.

[23] Spain v. Canada. ICJ Reports. 1998, pp. 432, 449; 123 ILR, pp. 189, 209–10.

[24] Armed Actions (Nicaragua v. Honduras) case. ICJ Reports. 1988, p. 76; 84 ILR, p. 231.

[25] Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions case. PCIJ. Series A, No. 2, p. 34; 2 AD, p. 27.

[26] Serbia and Montenegro v. UK. ICJ Reports. 2004, pp. 1307, 1323.

[27] Genocide Convention (Bosnia v. Serbia) case. ICJ Reports. 2007, paras. 117.

[28] Serbia and Montenegro v. UK. ICJ Reports. 2004, pp. 1307, 1322.

[32] Nicaragua case. ICJ Reports, 1986, pp. 3, 32; 76 ILR, pp. 349, 366.

[33] Djibouti v. France. ICL Reports. 2008, para. 48.

[34] The Monetary Gold case. ICJ Reports. 1954, pp. 19, 31; 21 ILR, pp. 399, 406.

[35] Corfu Channel (Preliminary Objections). ICJ Reports, 1948, p. 27.

[36] ICJ Reports. 1954. pp. 19, 54; 21 ILR, pp. 399, 406.

[39] Case Concerning Border and Trans-Border Armed Actions (Honduras v. Nicaragua). 8 ICJ Reports. 1988. pp. 78–90.

[40] Barcelona Traction case (Preliminary Objections). ICJ Reports. 1964. p. 6.

[42] Spain v. Canada. ICJ Reports. 1998. pp. 432, 454. 123 ILR, pp. 189, 214.

[2] Surbhi. (n.d.). Conflicts of dual judicature: Trial of Raja Nand Kumar. Legal Service India - Law, Lawyers and Legal Resources. https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-1457-conflicts-of-dual-judicature-trial-of-raja-nand-kumar.html#google_vignette

[4] Singh, M. P High Courts and the Privy Council.

[5] Singh, M. P High Courts and the Privy Council.

[8] Das, N. (2024, July 9). Pune Porsche crash: here’s what we know so far. The Indian Express. Retrieved July 9, 2024, from https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/pune/pune-porsche-crash-what-we-know-9346927/.

[9] Satish, S. (2023, October 10). History of Indian judiciary. Clear IAS. https://www.clearias.com/history-indian-judiciary/

[10] Murti, P. Retrieved July 9, 2024, from https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/juscrp3&div=246&id=&page=.

[1] Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958, § 1

[2] Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958, § 2-3

[3] Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958, § 4-5

[4] Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958, § 6-7

[6] International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Dec. 16, 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171

[1] Assistant Professor of Law, Centre for Legal Studies, Gitarattan International Business School d.raman17@yahoo.com

[2] E., & Elliott, D. (1985). The Evolutionary Tradition in Jurisprudence. Columbia Law Review, 85, 38. https://doi.org/10.2307/1122404.

[6] Gouvêa, D. (2015). Explanation and the Evolutionary First Law(s). Philosophy of Science, 82, 363 - 382. https://doi.org/10.1086/681603.

[7] Deakin, S. (2014). Legal evolution: integrating economic and systemic approaches.. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1934738.

[8] Pandey, S., & Spoorthi, B. (2023). Understanding the Social Consequences of Legal Developments in India. Technoarete Transactions on Advances in Social Sciences and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.36647/ttassh/03.02.a001.

[9] Kirkby, C. (2018). Law Evolves: The Uses of Primitive Law in Anglo-American Concepts of Modern Law, 1861-1961. American Journal of Legal History. https://doi.org/10.1093/AJLH/NJY020.

[10] Steward, J. (1949). CULTURAL CAUSALITY AND LAW: A TRIAL FORMULATION OF THE

DEVELOPMENT OF EARLY CIVILIZATIONS. American Anthropologist, 51, 1-27.

https://doi.org/10.1525/AA.1949.51 1.02A00020.

[11] Toews, J. (1989). The Immanent Genesis and Transcendent Goal of Law: Savigny, Stahl, and The Ideology of the Christian German State. American Journal of Comparative Law, 37, 139. https://doi.org/10.2307/840445.

[12] Bris, D. (2019). Testing Legal Origins Theory within France: Customary Laws versus Roman Code. Journal of Comparative Economics, 47, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2359261.

[13] Rai, N. (2010). Volksgeist: In View of Friedrich Carl Von Savigny. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1695389.

[14] Countryman, E., & Thompson, E. (1993). Customs in Common.. William and Mary Quarterly, 50, 610. https://doi.org/10.2307/2947373.

[15] Peari, S. (2014). Savigny’s theory of choice-of-law as a principle of ‘voluntary submission’. University of

Toronto Law Journal, 64, 106 - 151. https://doi.org/10.3138/UTLJ.1203.

[16] Halsted, J. (1969). Friedrich von Savigny: Of The Vocation of our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00484-3_17.

[17] ??sevenler, O. (2022). Of the Ageless Vocation for Legislation and Jurisprudence. Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.54049/taad.1183563.

[18] Crowe, J. (2016). Natural Law Theories. Philosophy Compass, 11, 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/PHC3.12315.

[19] Raude, K. (2022). Der Volksgeist bei Jacob Grimm. . https://doi.org/10.5771/9783465144274.

[20] Karsten, P. (1991). The “Discovery” of Law by English and American Jurists of the Seventeenth, Eighteenth, and Nineteenth Centuries: Third-Party Beneficiary Contracts as a Test Case.

Law and History Review, 9, 327 - 381. https://doi.org/10.2307/743651.

[21] Small, A. (1923). Some Contributions to the History of Sociology. Section II. The Thibaut-Savigny Controversy: Continuity as a Phase of Human Experience. American Journal of Sociology, 28, 711 - 734. https://doi.org/10.1086/213550.

[1] The Indian copyright Act 1957, s.15, no.14, Acts of parliament, 1957

[2] Akash varadaraj, Intellectual Property Rights in the Fashion Industry, vakil search, (accessed July 6, 2204, 10:40 am) https://vakilsearch.com/blog/intellectual-property-rights-in-the-fashion-industry/

[3] Geographical Indications of goods (Registration and Protection) Act 1999, s.8, no.48, Acts of parliament 1999

[4] Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act 1999, s.18, no.48, Acts of parliament 1999

[1] Virginity test’ still haunts some Indian brides

Young members of an Indian tribe are fighting to end the 400-year-old practice March 13, 2019

[2] https://scholar.google.it/citations?user=h9tDyMwAAAAJ&hl=en

[3] Faculty of Humanities, Development and Social Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.2009 https://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/server

[4] Patterns of Contraceptive Use Within Teenagers’ First Sexual Relationships Jennifer Manlove, Suzanne Ryan, and Kerry Franzetta https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1473988/

[6] https://legalfundi.com/legal-question/section-14-right-to-privacy

[1] Kaushal Kishore v State of Uttar Pradesh W.P. (Criminal 116/2016).

[2] Kaushal Kishore v State of Uttar Pradesh W.P. (Criminal 116/2016).

[4] Azam Khan- Freedom of Speech and Expression, SUPREME COURT OBSERVER, https://www.scobserver.in/cases/kaushal-kishor-uttar-pradesh-azam-khan-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-case-background/

[5] Kaushal Kishore v State of Uttar Pradesh W.P. (Criminal 116/2016).

[6] Kaushal Kishore v State of Uttar Pradesh W.P. (Criminal 116/2016), CENTRE FOR COMMUNICATION GOVERNANCE, https://privacylibrary.ccgnlud.org/case/kaushal-kishore-vs-state-of-uttar-pradesh-ors.

[7] Rudul Sah vs. State of Bihar, (1983) 4 SCC 141; Sebastian M. Hungary vs. Union of India, (1984) 3 SCC 82; Bhim Singh vs. State of J&K, (1985) 4 SCC 677; People’s Union for Democratic Rights vs. Police Commissioner, (1989) 4 SCC 730; Saheli vs. Commissioner of Police, (1990) 1 SCC 422; State of Maharashtra vs. Ravikant S. Patil, (1991) 2 SCC 373; Kumari vs. State of Tamil Nadu, (1992) 2 SCC 223; Shakuntala Devi vs. Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking, (1995) 2 SCC 369; Tamil Nadu Electricity Board vs. Sumanth, (2000) 4 SCC 543; Railway Board vs. Chandrima Das, (2000) 2 SCC 465.

[8] Kaushal Kishore v State of Uttar Pradesh W.P. (Criminal 116/2016).

[9] The case of Kaushal Kishore v State of Uttar Pradesh, https://www.jyotijudiciary.com/the-case-of-kaushal-kishore-vs-state-of-up/#:~:text=In%20a%20partially%20dissenting%20opinion,guaranteed%20according%20to%20article%2021.

[1] Garland B (2004) Neuroscience and the law: brain, mind, and the scales of justice (Dana, Washington, D.C.).

[2] Owen D. Jones, Joshua W. Buckholtz, Jeffery D. Schall, Rene Marois (2014) Brain Imaging for Judges: An Introduction to Law and Neuroscience (University of Nebraska, Lincoln). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1459&context=ajacourtreview

[3] Corey Hill Allen, Eyal Aharoni (2019) Brain scan evidence in criminal sentencing: A blessing and a curse (The Conversation, Australia).

https://theconversation.com/brain-scan-evidence-in-criminal-sentencing-a-blessing-and-a-curse-113088

[4] Barth, A. S. (2007). A Double-Edged Sword: The Role of Neuroimaging in Federal Capital Sentencing. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 33(2–3), 501–522.

https://doi.org/10.1177/009885880703300214

[7] New York v. Herbert Weinstein. No. 156 Misc.2d 34 (591 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1992).

[9] Nicky Woolf (2014) Man develops powerful love of Johnny Cash following deep brain stimulation (The Guardian).

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/may/27/johnny-cash-deep-brain-stimulation-urge-listen

[10] Nsikan Akpan (2014) ScienceShot: Deep Brain Stimulation Triggers Hallucinations (American Association for Advancement of Science).

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/04/scienceshot-deep-brain-stimulation-triggers-hallucinations

[11] Laura A. Cabrera, Jennifer Carter- Johnson (2018) It’s not my fault, my brain implant made me do it (The Conversation, Australia).

https://theconversation.com/its-not-my-fault-my-brain-implant-made-me-do-it-91040

[12] Sara Reardon (2017) AI-controlled brain implants for mood disorders tested in people (Nature, Vol. 551 Issue 7682).

https://www.nature.com/news/ai-controlled-brain-implants-for-mood-disorders-tested-in-people-1.23031

[14] R. Douglas Fields (2016) Wireless Brain Implant Allows “Locked-In” Woman to Communicate (Scientific American).

[15] Lily Hay Newman (2019) These Hackers Made an App That Kills to Prove a Point (Wired).

[16] Laurie Pycroft, Sandra G. Boccard, Sarah L.F. Owen, John F. Stein, James J. Fitzgerald, Alexander L. Green, Tipu Z. Aziz (2016) Brainjacking: Implant Security Issues in Invasive Neuromodulation (Science Direct, Vol. 92, 454-462).

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1878875016302728?via%3Dihub

[19] Greely HT (2009) Law and the revolution in neuroscience: an early look at the field. Akron L Rev 42:687–715.

[21] Kolber AJ (2007) Pain detection and the privacy of subjective experience. Am J L Med 33:433–456.

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

ARTICLE 36 AND ICJ JURISDICTION: MAPPING THE TERRAIN OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION BY - VEDANSH SHARMA

THE HISTORICAL AND THE PRESENT ARCHIETURE OF THE INDIAN JUDICIARY BY - MAANYA JAIN

THE ARMED FORCES (SPECIAL POWERS) ACT, 1958: VIOLENCE BECAME THE WAY OF LIFE BY - SWINI

LAW AN EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS COMMENT ON SAVIGNY BY - RAMANDEEP KAUR

FROM PROMISE TO PRACTICE: UNPACKING INDIAS RIGHT TO EDUCATION ACT, 2009 BY - JAYDEEP FINDORIA

THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE FASHION INDUSTRY BY - MANIK PAHUJA

ECONOMIC ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE BY- ASHOK KUMAR TIWARI & PROFF. (DR.) CHANDRASHEKHAR

“ROOT CAUSES OF CUSTOMARY PRACTICES OF VIRGINITY TESTING IN INDIA AND AFRICA” BY - MADHURI TULSHIRAM GANGURDE & DR. ADV HARITA SHINDE BANGALI

FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND PUBLIC FUNCTIONARIES: A SOCIO-LEGAL CRITIQUE OF KAUSHAL KISHORE V. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (2023) BY - LOKESH MITTAL & SANIGHDHA

SCOPE OF NEUROSCIENCE BEYOND DETERMINING RESPONSIBILITY: LEGALITY AND RESPONSIBILITY OF BRAIN IMPLANTS BY - ARCHANA VISWANATH

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

[1] Virginity test’ still haunts some Indian brides

[4] Patterns of Contraceptive Use Within Teenagers’ First Sexual Relationships Jennifer Manlove, Suzanne Ryan, and Kerry Franzetta https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1473988/

Citation

Citation

Citation 2