INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

Right to Privacy vs. Administrative Discretion: A Critical Examination in the Context of Digital Governance in India BY - Arundhati Chatterjee

Authors :Arundhati Chatterjee

Registration ID : 107954 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7954

Year : Jun-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : arundhatichatterjee58@gmail.com

Page No : 22 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

Delay In Process, Denial Of Justice: The Jurisprudence And Empirics Of Speedy Trials In Comparative Perspective BY - Deepanshi Choudhary & Priyanshu Jaglan

Authors :Deepanshi Choudhary & Priyanshu Jaglan

Registration ID : 107952 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7952 & IJLRA 7953

Year : Jun-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : jaglanpriyanshu2018@gmail.com & deepanshichaudhary46@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

Corporate Governance In Family-Owned Businesses In India: Confronting The Challengestop Of Form BY - Mrs. E. Ramya & (Dr.) Gowri Ramesh

Authors :Mrs. E. Ramya & (Dr.) Gowri Ramesh

Registration ID : 107950 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7950 & IJLRA 7951

Year : Jun-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : ebsramya@gmail.com & gowriramesh.law@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

DEFAMATION ON SOCIAL MEDIA BY - Prashant Rajpoot & Suyash Kumar Vishwakarma

Authors :Prashant Rajpoot & Suyash Kumar Vishwakarma

Registration ID : 107948 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7948 & IJLRA 7949

Year : Jun-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : upsainianprashant3614@gmail.com & Parhm3614@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN IN INDIA: AN ANALYSIS PERSPECTIVES FROM INDIA (By- Shikha Bhatnagar & Dr. Sarika Tyagi)

Authors: Shikha Bhatnagar & Dr. Sarika Tyagi

Registration ID: 101055 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA1054, IJLRA1055

Year : August-2022 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: Shikha Bhatnagar-shikhadvocate@gmail.com & Dr. Sarika Tyag-tyagisarika21@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0035

Doi Link: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/08.2022-42537678/Shikha Bhatnagar & Dr. Sarika Tyag

Protection Of Homebuyers Interests Under Rera: A Critical Study BY - SONU KUMAR

Authors :SONU KUMAR

Registration ID : 1079457 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7947

Year : Jun-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : sonu.kumar@jru.edu.in

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

Critical Appraisal Of Arbitration Proceeding In Case Of Insolvency BY - Mahek Soni &Manu Sharma

Authors :Mahek Soni & Manu Sharma

Registration ID : 107945 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7945 & IJLRA 7946

Year : Jun-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : maheksoni0291@gmail.com & manusharma5980@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

“Combating Stereotypes” –Patterns Of Reproductive Justice Of Women With Intellectual Disability. BY - Dr.Asha.J

Authors :Dr.Asha.J

Registration ID : 107944 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7944

Year : Jun-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : ashaparvathy08@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link :

EXPLORING THE CHALLENGES IN HOLDING A STATE ACCOUNTABLE UNDER GENOCIDE CONVENTION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BY - SUKHADA DHOTE

Authors : SUKHADA DHOTE

Registration ID : 107943 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7943

Year : Jun-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : sukhadadhote.student@slsnagpur.edu.in

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/06.2024-31283743/EXPLORING THE CHALLENGES IN HOLDING A STATE ACCOUN

AN ANALYSIS TOWARDS VICARIOUS LIABILITY OF STATE IN REFERENCE WITH TORTS LAW BY: HITESH SHARMA & MS. PRIYADARSHINI TIWARI

Authors : HITESH SHARMA & MS. PRIYADARSHINI TIWARI

Registration ID : 107941 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7941 & IJLRA7942

Year : Jun-2024 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : h.sharma1032@gmail.com

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/06.2024-47528895/AN ANALYSIS TOWARDS VICARIOUS LIABILITY OF STATE I

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] MP Jain, Indian Constitutional Law (8th edn, LexisNexis 2018) 1351.

[4] KS Puttaswamy v Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1.

[5] MP Jain, Indian Constitutional Law (8th edn, LexisNexis 2018) 1351.

[8] Barium Chemicals Ltd v Company Law Board AIR 1967 SC 295.

[9] General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679.

[10] Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act 2016.

[11] Robert K Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th edn, Sage 2018).

[12] R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1994) 6 SCC 632.

[13] Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, (1985) 1 SCC 641.

[15] Gobind v. State of Madhya Pradesh, (1975) 2 SCC 148.

[16] R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1994) 6 SCC 632.

[17] People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. Union of India, (1997) 1 SCC 301.

[19] The Information Technology (Reasonable Security Practices and Procedures and Sensitive Personal Data or Information) Rules, 2011.

[20] The Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016.

[21] Joint Statement on Cooperation in Information and Communication Technologies between the European Union and the Republic of India (2018).

[22] Digital India Programme, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India, available at https://www.digitalindia.gov.in/ (last visited on Apr. 10, 2023).

[23] Subhash Bhatnagar, E-Government: From Vision to Implementation – A Practical Guide with Case Studies 31 (2004).

[24] Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v. Wednesbury Corporation, [1948] 1 KB 223.

[25] A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India, AIR 1970 SC 150.

[26] I.P. Massey, Administrative Law 247 (9th ed. 2017).

[27] Council of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service, [1985] AC 374.

[28] S.P. Sampath Kumar v. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC 386.

[29] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, (2019) 1 SCC 1.

[30] Chief Constable of the North Wales Police v. Evans, [1982] 1 WLR 1155.

[31] Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee, A Free and Fair Digital Economy: Protecting Privacy, Empowering Indians (2018).

[32] Usha Ramanathan, "Implications of Aadhaar and the Right to Privacy," 52(37) Economic and Political Weekly 10 (2017).

[33] Vrinda Bhandari and Renuka Sane, "Protecting citizens from the State post Puttaswamy: Analysing the privacy implications of the Justice Srikrishna Committee Report and the Data Protection Bill, 2018," 14(2) Socio-Legal Review 143 (2018).

[34] Amber Sinha and Elonnai Hickok, "The Srikrishna Committee Data Protection Bill and Artificial Intelligence in India," The Centre for Internet and Society, Oct. 31, 2018

[35] Unique Identification Authority of India, "About Aadhaar," https://uidai.gov.in/about-aadhaar.html.

[36] Vrinda Bhandari and Renuka Sane, "Protecting citizens from the state post Puttaswamy: Analysing the privacy implications of the Justice Srikrishna Committee Report and the Data Protection Bill, 2018," Socio-Legal Review 14, no. 2 (2018): 143.

[37] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, (2019) 1 SCC 1.

[40] Saikat Datta, "The Dangers of NATGRID," The Hindu, June 22, 2011.

[41] Udbhav Tiwari, "The Design & Technology behind India's Surveillance Programmes," The Centre for Internet and Society, January 20, 2017.

[43] Smitha Krishna Prasad, "Surveillance in India: Policy and Practice," NLUD Journal of Legal Studies 1, no. 2 (2019): 58.

[44] Anja Kovacs and Dixie Hawtin, "Cyber Security, Surveillance, and the Right to Privacy in India," The Centre for Internet and Society, November 2013.

[45] K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.

[46] Bedavyasa Mohanty, "India's Surveillance State: A Review of the Indian Telegraph Act and the Information Technology Act," The Leaflet, July 30, 2018.

[47] Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, "Smart Cities Mission," http://smartcities.gov.in/.

[48] Anuj Tiwari and Subhash Chandra, "Sustainability of Smart Cities in India: Challenges and Solutions," International Journal of Applied Engineering Research 13, no. 12 (2018): 10412.

[49] Vikas Tomer and Priyanka Yadav, "Privacy Concerns in Smart Cities of India," CPR South (2019).

[51] Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee, "A Free and Fair Digital Economy: Protecting Privacy, Empowering Indians" (2018).

[53] General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Art. 5.

[54] Vrinda Bhandari and Renuka Sane, "Protecting Citizens from the State Post Puttaswamy" (2018) 14(2) Socio-Legal Review 138.

[56] Graham Greenleaf, "India's Data Protection Framework: The Missing Pieces" (2018) 149 Privacy Laws & Business International Report 18.

[57] Sunil Abraham and Elonnai Hickok, "Government Access to Private Sector Data in India" (2012) 2(4) International Data Privacy Law 302.

[58] Rishab Bailey et al., "Disclosures in Privacy Policies: Does 'Notice and Consent' Work?" (2018) NIPFP Working Paper No. 246.

[59] Maria Xynou and Kodali Naga Bhaskar Rao, "India's Surveillance State" (2015) 50(32) Economic & Political Weekly 21.

[61] Ann Cavoukian, "Privacy by Design: The 7 Foundational Principles" (2009).

[63] Smitha Krishna Prasad, "Privacy and Data Protection in India: A Critical Assessment" (2018) 53(1) Journal of the Indian Law Institute 1.

[64] Udbhav Tiwari et al., "The Design & Technology behind India's Surveillance Programmes" (2017) The Centre for Internet and Society.

[65] Anja Kovacs and Dixie Hawtin, "Cyber Security, Surveillance, and the Right to Privacy in India" (2013) The Centre for Internet and Society.

[66] Maria Xynou and Kodali Naga Bhaskar Rao, "India's Surveillance State" (2015) 50(32) Economic & Political Weekly 21.

[1] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/readersblog/lawpedia/judicial-delay-in-india-50731/

[4] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562214/

[6] https://www.projectjurisprudence.com/2020/06/delay-in-process-denial-of-justice.html

[7] https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/aulr11&div=15&id=&page=

[1] Swati Deva, Corporate Governance of Family-Run Companies: Comparison of India and Hong Kong, in The Indian Yearbook of Comparative Law 2016 0 (Mahendra Pal Singh ed., 2018), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199482139.003.0006 (last visited May 3, 2024).

[2] Vrajlal K. Sapovadia & Kandarp Patel, Is Blood Thicker than Water? Appraising Adequacy of Indian Corporate Governance for Family Based Companies: A Case Study of Satyam Computers, (2009), https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1347868 (last visited May 7, 2024).

[3] Sanjeev Saxena et al., Examining the Corporate Governance Strategies of Indian Family-Run Companies: Insights from Selected Enterprises, 11 Journal of Law and Sustainable Development e1713 (2023).

[4] A Note on the Efficacy of the Current Corporate Governance Regulations in India by Santosh Pande, Valeed Ahmad Ansari?:: SSRN, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2333023 (last visited May 9, 2024).

[5] Anjali Malik, Challenges of Family-Owned Business in India: A Survey Based Analysis of Family Business Owners, 6 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN INDUSTRY (2018).

[6] Lee Hoverd, Tales of Turmoil: 10 Family Business Scandals, Tharawat Magazine (Sep. 27, 2023), https://www.tharawat-magazine.com/sustain/family-business-scandals/ (last visited Jun 17, 2024).

[7] Kasmin Fernandes, Biggest Corporate Governance Failures in India, The CSR Journal (Apr. 20, 2021), https://thecsrjournal.in/corporate-governance-failures-india/ (last visited Jun 17, 2024).

[8] Nandini Rajagopalan & Yan Zhang, Corporate Governance Reforms in China and India: Challenges and Opportunities, 51 Business Horizons 55 (2008).

[9] Philip M. Beattie, Small Family-Owned Firms: The Challenges of Corporate Governance, 99 Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis 1 (2018).

[10] Rakesh Pandey, Dennis Taylor & Mahesh Joshi, Governance of Large Family Companies in Traditional and New Economy Industries in India: Effects on Financial Performance, 8 Corporate Ownership and Control 108 (2011).

[11] Surbhi Vyas -, Corporate Governance Practices in India: Problems & Importance, 5 IJFMR 2801 (2023).

[12] Amit Majumder, Corporate Governance Practices of Family Enterprises: A Study on Some Selected Indian Family Governed Companies, 8 IRA-International Journal of Management & Social Sciences (ISSN 2455-2267) 232 (2017).

[1] 4^th Year Law Student of Central University of South Bihar.

[2] 4^th Year Law Student of Central University of South Bihar.

[9] Suit No. 1279/2001 decided by Session court, Delhi

[10] Civil Suit No. 219/18 CNR No. DLSW010034832018

[11] Case No. 27/2019 decided by Delhi High court on 23 October 2019

[1] 1 E.T. Realty, Homebuyers Can Now Move NCDRC Directly against a Builder, October 13, 2016, available at http://realty.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/regulatory/homebuyers- can-now-movencdrc-directly-against-a-builder/54823235 (Last visited on January 13, 2017).

[2] 2The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

[3] Section 72 (provides that: "While adjudging the quantum of compensation or interest, as the case may be, under section 71, the adjudicating officer shall have due regard to the following factors, namely:- (a) the amount of disproportionate gain or unfair advantage, wherever quantifiable, made as a result of the default; (b) the amount of loss caused as a result of the default; (c) the repetitive nature of the default; (d) such other factors which the adjudicating officer considers necessary to the case in furtherance of justice.").

[1] Section 41(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996

[2] Section 41(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996

[3] Section 41(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996

[4] APPEAL No. 16850 OF 2017, (@ S.L.P.(c) No.27722/2017), (D.No.21033/2017)

[7] Section 14(4) of the Code: The order of moratorium shall have effect from the date of such order till the completion of the corporate insolvency resolution process:

Provided that where at any time during the corporate insolvency resolution process period, if the Adjudicating Authority approves the resolution plan under sub-section (1) of section 31 or passes an order for liquidation of the corporate debtor under section 33, the moratorium shall cease to have effect from the date of such approval or liquidation order, as the case may be.

[9] Civil Appeal No. 5251 of 1993, (2000) 4 SCC 539

[11] Civil Appeal No.1070 /2021 @ SLP (C) NO. 8120 OF 2020.

[12] AIR 2021 SUPREME COURT 1638, AIRONLINE 2021 SC 171

[13] Initiation of Corporate insolvency resolution process by financial creditor.

[16] AIR 2021 SUPREME COURT 1638, AIRONLINE 2021 SC 171

[1] Dr. Sushama Sharma, Reproductive Rights and women Health: a New Prospective, 4 Inl. Jnl. of Humanities and Social Science Inventions, 2319, 2319 – 7714 (Apr. 2015).

[2] Palguna M& Jagruthi Rao, An Insight In to The Development Of Reproductive Rights Of Women With Special Reference To India, 1 Indique Law Journal 1-1(2023).

[3] Renu Addlakha Mahima Nayar, Disability and Sexuality: Intersectional Analysis in India, Centre for Women’s Development Studies, New Delhi.

Occasional paper No.63 (Aug.2017).

[4] Herring, Jonathan (2021) "The Case for Decriminalization of Abortion 33 Jnl. Of NLU, Delhi 21-38,(2019).

[5] Malavika Parthasarathy, Integrating Mental Health Perspectives in Legal Discourse on Reproductive Justice.

[6] Simi Rose George, Reproductive Rights: A Comparative Study of Constitutional Jurisprudence, Judicial Attitudes and State Policies in India and the U.S, 18 NSLR, 92-103 (Oct.2006).

[7] Joseph shine v. Union of India, (2019)3 SCC 39(India). Nav Tej Johar v. Union of India (2018)10 SCC 1(India), Justice Putta Swami V. Union of India (2017)10 SCC1 (India).

[8] ICPD, held in 1994 in Cairo, helps to highlight the arguments that were made around the abortion debate.

[9] UN Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities was enacted in 2006 and India being a signatory adopted convention to national legislation

[10] Rights of People with Disabilities Act, 2016 , No.49 Act of Parliament 2016,sec.3(1).

[11] Rights of People with Disabilities Act, 2016, No.49 Act of Parliament 2016, Sec.4.

[12] Rights of People with Disabilities Act, 2016, No.49 Act of Parliament 2016, Sec. 6.

[13] The disabilities include physical, mental intellectual and disability resulting from neurological conditions

[14] Rights of People with Disabilities Act, 2016, No.49 Act of Parliament 2016.

[15] The Mental Health Act,2017 NO.10 Act of parliament ,2017,Sec.2(s) .

[16] Dipika Jain & Shampa Sen Gupta, Reproductive Rights and disability Rights through an intersectional analysis, 12 JLR, 337-357(2021).

[17] Debutta Naik et.al, Shortcomings of Mental health Act, 2017, Indian Jnl. of Private Psychiatry 1-2 (2023).

[18] The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, Act No.34 of 1971.

[19] Ambika Gupta, A critical Analysis of the short comings of MTP (Amendment) Act 2021, 1, VULJ, 86-103,(Nov.2021).

[20] Poorna Sharma v. Union of India, M.A.2157/2023 in W.P(C) No. 1137/2023 (India). X v. Family Welfare Department 2022 SCC Online SC 905(India).

[21] X v. Principal Secretary 2022 SCC Online SC 1321(India)..

[26] Cry For Life society v. Union Of India, W.P(C) No.10130/2013(India).

[27]Gauri Pillai, Shades of Life in Indian Abortion Law, 16 NLSJ, 128-134(2022).

[31] Sharmishta Chakraborthy v. UOI(2018) 4 SCC 289(India).. , Nisha Suresh Alam v. UOI, W.P (S.T)No.36727/2017(India)., A v. UOI (2018)14 SCC 33(India).

[32] Komal Hiwale v. State of Maharastra, (2020) SLP NO.7379 of 2020(India). Akhila .k v. UOI (2021) SCC Online Ker.804 (India).

[1] Stone L. Quantifying the Holocaust: Hyperintense kill rates during the Nazi genocide. Sci Adv. 2019 Jan 2;5(1):eaau7292. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau7292. PMID: 30613773; PMCID: PMC6314819

[2] General Assembly resolution 96(1) of December 11, 1946

[3] Article I. The Statute of the International Criminal Court.

[4] See., The judgment of the Nuremberg Tribunal [www.yale.edu/lawweb/ avalon/imt/proc/judcont.htm]

[6] Art. VI of the Convention on prevention and Punishment of the crime of Genocide states that ‘[p]ersons charged with genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be tried … by such international penal tribunal as may have jurisdiction with respect to those Contracting Parties which shall have accepted its jurisdiction’.

[7] See Application of Convention on Prevention and Punishment of Crime of Genocide (Croat v Serb.), Judgement, 2015 I.C.J. Rep. 3, 129 (Feb 3)

[9] Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro)

[10] State Responsibility for Complicity in Genocide: The Requirement of Mens Rea, Erika Josefsson

[11] See, e.g., Rep. of the Int’l Criminal Court, 34, U.N. Doc. A/63/323 (Aug. 22, 2008) [hereinafter ICC Report]. The International Criminal Court (ICC) has made two indictments in the case of Darfur, but neither individual has been surrendered to the Court, and one still serves a political position in al-Bashir's administration. See id.; Q & A: Crisis in Darfur, HUM. RTS. WATCH [hereinafter Crisis in Darfur], http://www.hrw.org/ english/docs/2004/05/05/darfur8536.htm (last updated Apr. 25, 2008)

[12] The United Nations first referred the situation in Darfur to the ICC in 2005 through UN Security Council Resolution 1593. S.C. Res. 1593, available at U.N. Doc. S/RES/1593 (Mar. 31, 2005).

[13] Prosecutor v. Al Bashir, Case No. ICC-02/05-01/09, Warrant of Arrest, at 8 (Mar. 4, 2009).

[14] Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court arts. 12-13,July 17, 1998, 2187 U.N.T.S. 90 [hereinafter Rome Statute].

[17] See Laura Trevelyan, UN Urged to Suspend Sudan Case, BBC NEWS (Feb. 16, 2009), http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/7892063.stm.

[18] See Zeynep Gurcanli, Sudan Seeks Turkey's Support in UN Security Council to Save al Bashir, HORRrvET DAiLY NEWS & ECON. REv. (Feb. 4, 2009), http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ english/world/10927100.asp?gid=244; see also Al-Bashir Seeks Egypt's Help on Darfur Warrant, NEWSVINE.COM (Feb. 22, 2009), http://www.newsvine.com/-news/2009/02/22/2464187- al-bashir-seeks-egypts-help-on-darfur-warrant.

[21] RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW § 206(a) (1987)

[22] See Nick Wadhams, Indicted Over Darfur, Sudan's President Feints and Punches Back, TIME (Oct. 21, 2008), http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1852448,00.html.

[24] United Nations. “Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.” UN Audiovisual Library of International Law. 2012.

[25] “Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide” p3

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

Right to Privacy vs. Administrative Discretion: A Critical Examination in the Context of Digital Governance in India BY - Arundhati Chatterjee

Delay In Process, Denial Of Justice: The Jurisprudence And Empirics Of Speedy Trials In Comparative Perspective BY - Deepanshi Choudhary & Priyanshu Jaglan

Corporate Governance In Family-Owned Businesses In India: Confronting The Challengestop Of Form BY - Mrs. E. Ramya & (Dr.) Gowri Ramesh

DEFAMATION ON SOCIAL MEDIA BY - Prashant Rajpoot & Suyash Kumar Vishwakarma

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN IN INDIA: AN ANALYSIS PERSPECTIVES FROM INDIA (By- Shikha Bhatnagar & Dr. Sarika Tyagi)

Protection Of Homebuyers Interests Under Rera: A Critical Study BY - SONU KUMAR

Critical Appraisal Of Arbitration Proceeding In Case Of Insolvency BY - Mahek Soni &Manu Sharma

“Combating Stereotypes” –Patterns Of Reproductive Justice Of Women With Intellectual Disability. BY - Dr.Asha.J

EXPLORING THE CHALLENGES IN HOLDING A STATE ACCOUNTABLE UNDER GENOCIDE CONVENTION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BY - SUKHADA DHOTE

AN ANALYSIS TOWARDS VICARIOUS LIABILITY OF STATE IN REFERENCE WITH TORTS LAW BY: HITESH SHARMA & MS. PRIYADARSHINI TIWARI

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2