[1] Dr.Durga Das Basu’s Comparative Constitutional Law ,309,(Justice G B Patnaik,Yasobant Das,Rita das,3 rd
ed.2014)
[2]Navisha Uzaira Khan, Kohelica Nag, Comparative Study Of The Amendment Procedure In India, Switzerland, Canada, Usa, France And Germany,International Journal of Research and analytical review,260,276(2023),available at https://www.ijrar.org/papers/IJRARTH00136.pdf,last seen on 26/04/2024
[3] Ullman v. United States, 350 U.S. 422, 428 (1956)
[4]Navisha Uzaira Khan, Kohelica Nag, Comparative Study Of The Amendment Procedure In India, Switzerland, Canada, Usa, France And Germany,International Journal of Research and analytical review,260,276(2023),available at https://www.ijrar.org/papers/IJRARTH00136.pdf,last seen on 26/04/2024
[5] Mathias Reimann, Takeover: German Reunification Under A Magnifying Glass the Imperfect Union:
Constitutional Structures of German Unification. by Peter E. Quint. Princeton: Princeton University Press.1997. Pp. Xi, 482. $75., 96 Mich. L. Rev. 1988, 1995-96 (1998)
[7] Section 79 of the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany
[8]Navisha Uzaira Khan, Kohelica Nag, Comparative Study Of The Amendment Procedure In India, Switzerland, Canada, Usa, France And Germany,International Journal of Research and analytical review,260,276(2023),available at https://www.ijrar.org/papers/IJRARTH00136.pdf,last seen on 26/04/2024
[9]Shankari Prasad v.union of India AIR1951SC458 (followed by the majority in sajjan singh vs state of Rajasthan AIR1965 SC 845)
[10]Golakh Nath v.state of Punjab ,AIR 1967 SC 1643
[11] Keshvanand Bharti v.state of Kerala,AIR 1973 SC 1461
[13] Keshvanand Bharti v.state of Kerala,AIR 1973 SC 1461
[14]Uddin, Mohammad Moin, and Rakiba Nabi. “JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS IN LIGHT OF THE ‘POLITICAL QUESTION’ DOCTRINE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE JURISPRUDENCE OF SUPREME COURTS OF BANGLADESH, INDIA AND THE UNITED STATES.” Journal of the Indian Law Institute, vol. 58, no. 3, 2016, pp. 313–36. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/45163394. Last seen on 26/04/2024
[15] Dr.Durga Das Basu’s Comparative Constitutional Law ,315,(Justice G B Patnaik,Yasobant Das,Rita das,3 rd
ed.2014)
[16]Malek, Md. A. (2017). Vice and virtue of the Basic Structure Doctrine: a comparative analytic reconsideration of the Indian sub-continent’s constitutional practices. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 43(1), 48–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.2017.1358648, Last seen on 26/04/2024
[17] Dr.Durga Das Basu’s Comparative Constitutional Law ,316(Justice G B Patnaik,Yasobant Das,Rita das,3 rd
[3] Jaro Jasmin, A Comparative Study of Fundamental Rights in India and Canada, chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v6i6/24061710.pdf, Last seen on 25/04/2024
[4] Vivek Krishnamurthy, Colonial Cousins: Explaining India and Canada’s Unwritten Constitutional Principles, chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/72839538.pdf, Last seen on 25/04/2024
[5]Jaro Jasmin, A Comparative Study of Fundamental Rights in India and Canada, chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v6i6/24061710.pdf, Last seen on 25/04/2024
[6] Dr. Durga Das Basu, Comparative Constitutional Law, 136-152 (3rd Edition)
[7] Vivek Krishnamurthy, Colonial Cousins: Explaining India and Canada’s Unwritten Constitutional Principles, chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/72839538.pdf, Last seen on 25/04/2024
[8] Lalai Singh Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1987
[9]Satwant Singh Sawhney v. Ramarathnam, Assistant Passpost Officer, AIR 1967
[10] Singh v. Minister of Employment and Immigration, AIR 1985
[11] Vancouver Society of Immigrant and Visible Minority Women v. M.N.R., AIR 1999
Citation
[1]Trimex International FZE Ltd. v. Vedanata Aluminium Ltd, (2010) 3 SCC 1
[2]Trimex International FZE Ltd. v. Vedanata Aluminium Ltd, (2010) 3 SCC 1