INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

THE ROLE OF PRESUMPTION AND MAXIMS IN STATUTORY INTERPRETATION: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS BY - PALVE SHUBHAM LAHUDAS

Authors: PALVE SHUBHAM LAHUDAS

Registration ID: 107288 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7288

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGES IN INDIA AND SELECTED COUNTRIES BY - PALVE SHUBHAM LAHUDAS

Authors: PALVE SHUBHAM LAHUDAS

Registration ID: 107287 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7287

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

PATENT WARS IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY: BALANCING ACCESS TO MEDICINE AND INNOVATION BY - NEHA SHARMA & DR SUPERNA VENAIK

Authors: NEHA SHARMA & DR SUPERNA VENAIK

Registration ID: 107286 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7286 & IJLRA7290

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION AND THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 2019 BY : ADV. PALLAVI NITIN PAWAR

Authors: ADV. PALLAVI NITIN PAWAR

Registration ID: 107285 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7285

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

‘JURIS MEDICA NEXUS’: UNRAVELING MEDICO – LEGAL DYNAMICS IN INDIAN HEALTHCARE JURISPRUDENCE BY - VANSHIKA TEWARI

Authors: VANSHIKA TEWARI

Registration ID: 107284 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7284

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF CARTELS IN THE INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM BY- NINAD BOHIDAR

Authors: NINAD BOHIDAR

Registration ID: 107283 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7283

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

LEVERAGING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO REVOLUTIONIZE THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY BY - *SMITA PRAKASH

Authors: SMITA PRAKASH

Registration ID: 107282 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7282

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

THE ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT TO SAFEGUARD AND INTERPRET THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY - ADV. NUPUR SHRIRAM KULKARNI

Authors: ADV. NUPUR SHRIRAM KULKARNI

Registration ID: 107281 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7281

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIA AND USA BY: PRATHAMESH DILIP AHINAVE

Authors: PRATHAMESH DILIP AHINAVE

Registration ID: 107280 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7280

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

PROTECTION OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS IN THE DIGITAL AGE BY: ABHISHEK YADAV & DR TARU MISHRA

Authors: ABHISHEK YADAV & DR TARU MISHRA

Registration ID: 107278 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7278 & IJLRA7283

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[2][2] Makhani, C. S., Petkar, M. R., Chavan, K. D., & Rao, T. V. (2011). Awareness of medical ethics and medico-legal issues amongst medical professionals. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 4(4), 151-155.

[3] Paleakkara, A. (2021). Awareness of Medico Legal Aspects of Clinical Practise and Common Medico Legal Issues among Medical Graduates. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 15(1).

[4] Laxmisha, R. K., & Reddy, B. S. (2021). A Critical Study of Law Relating to Medico Legal Litigations in India (Doctoral dissertation, Alliance University).

[5] Tiwari, S. (2003). Medico Legal Problem. Indian Pediatrics, 40, 1011-1013.

[6] Tiwari, S. (2003). Medico Legal Problem. Indian Pediatrics, 40, 1011-1013.

[7] De Cruz, P. (2013). Comparative healthcare law. Routledge.

[8] De Cruz, P. (2013). Comparative healthcare law. Routledge.

[9] Pinto, E. P., & Pinto, E. P. (2021). An Overview of Health Care Jurisprudence in India. Health Justice in India: Citizenship, Power and Health Care Jurisprudence, 83-176.

[1] The Constitution of India, 1949, Art. 19(1)(g)

[4] Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969

[6] Sharddha Jain, Competition Law in India, iPleaders, (last visited 02.03.2024), Available at - https://blog.ipleaders.in/competition-law-in-india-2/#Emergence_of_Competition_Act_2002

[7] Sabapriya Ray, Emergence and Applicability of Competition Act, 2002 in India’s New Competitive Regime, IISTE, Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, ISSN 224-3259, Vol.1,2011.

[9] Chandler, Alfred D. Jr. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Belknap Press, 1977.

[10] Jones, Geoffrey. "The Growth of Cartels in Europe, 1900-1939." European Review of Economic History, vol. 1, no. 1, 1997, pp. 89-115.

[11] Https://globalcompetitionreview.com/review/the-asia-pacific-antitrust-review/2022/article/india-cartels

[12] Director, Supplies & Disposals, Haryana v Shree Cement Limited and Ors (Case No. Case No. 5 of 2013)

[13] Western Coalfields v SSV Coal Carriers Private Limited (Case No. 34 of 2015).

[14] In re Cartelisation by Broadcasting service providers by rigging bids submitted in response to the tenders floated by Sports Broadcasters (Suo motu Case No. 2 of 2013)

[15] Delhi Jal Board v Grasim Industries Ltd (Ref Case Nos. 3 and 4 of 2013).

[16] Alleged Anti-competitive conduct in Beer Market in India (suo motu Case No. 06 of 2017)

[17] Ms. Shikha Roy v Jet Airways (India) Limited and Ors (Case No 32 of 2016).

[18] Builder’s Association of India v CMA and Ors (Case No. 29 of 2010)

[19] Abhir Roay And Nishchal Joshipura, “Cartels in India”, Competition Law Insight (January 12, 2010), https://www.nishithdesai.com/Content/document/pdf/ResearchArticles/Cartels%20in%20India.pdf

[19] (1968) 3 ALL ER 721.

[20] Paolo Buccirossi (2006). “Does Parallel Behaviour Provide Some Evidence of Collusion”, LEAR –

Rome <http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1027&context=rle>

[21] DAF/COMP/GF/WD (2006). 37,“Contribution from Brazil”, Roundtable on Prosecuting Cartels

Without Direct Evidence of Agreement, Global Forum on Competition

[22] Dayal, P and Agarwal, M (2006). “State Government Policies and Competition”, Towards a functional

competition policy for India, Pradeep S Mehta (Ed), CUTS International & Academic Foundation

[25] In re: Sugar Mills, Case No. 1 of 2010 (CCI).

[26] Suo Motu Case Against LPG Cylinder Manufacturers, In re, [2012] CCI

[27] All India Tyre Dealers’ Federation v. Tyre Manufacturers, 2012 SCC CCI 65

[28] Builders Assn. of India v. Cement Manufacturers’ Assn., 2016 SCC CCI 46

[32] Aditya Kalra and Aditi Shah, Exclusive: Carlsberg, United Breweries plead leniency in India Beer Cartel Probe – Sources, Reuters (Last Visited 13-2-2024, 7.10 p.m.), https://www.reuters.com/article/india-regulator-brewers/exclusivecarlsberg-united-breweries-plead-leniency-in-india-beer-cartel-probe-sources-idINKBN1OC1QQ

[33] Avirup Bose, Circumstantial Evidence and Dawn Raids: A New Era of Antitrust Investigation in India (4-4-2013) Competition Law Reports, April 2013

[35] Aluminium Phosphide Tablets Manufacturers, In re, 2012 CCI 23.

[36] Builders Assn. of India v. Cement Manufacturers’ Assn., 2012 CCI 42.

[37]Suo Motu Case Against LPG Cylinder Manufacturers, In re, 2012 CCI 1

*The Author is an LL.M. student at Amity Law School, Amity University, Noida.

[1]https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/healthcare/biotech/pharmaceuticals/how-ai-is-changing-the-pharmaceutical-industry-in-india/articleshow/104101842.cms?from=mdr. Last visited: 11^th Apr.’24.

[2] Laurence H. Tribe, Soundings and Silences, 115 Mich. L. Rev. Online 26 (2016), available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr_online/vol115/iss1/3 last seen on 29/03/17.

[5] Dr Justice A.S. Anand Justice N.D. Krishna Rao Memorial Lecture Protection of Human Rights — Judicial

Obligation or Judicial Activism, (1997) 7 SCC (Jour) 1.

[6] State of Himachal Pradesh v. Kailash Chand Mahajan, 1992 AIR 1277, 1992 SCR (1) 917.

[7] Union of India v. Elphinstone Spinning and Weaving Co. Ltd., (2001) 4 SCC 139.

[17] Maneka Gandhi v. union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248: AIR 1978 SC 597.S

[18] S.R. Chaudhuri v. State of Punjab, (2001) 7 SCC 126.

[22] Constitution of India, article 132,133,134 and 136.

[29] A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 27.

[30] Pandit M. S. M. Sharma V. Shri Sri Krishna Sinha and Others, AIR 1959 SC 395.

[31] Express Newspapers Private. Ltd. and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors., 1986 AIR 872, 1985 SCR Supl. (3) 382.

[32] Sakal Papers (P) Ltd. v. The Union of India, 1962 3 SCR 842.

[33] Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, (1973) 4 SCC 225: AIR 1973 SC 1461.

[34] Chiranjit Lal Chowdhuri v. The Union of India and Ors., AIR 1951 SC 41.

[36] Devdatta Mukherjee, Judicial Implementation of Directive Principles of State Policy: Critical Perspectives, Volume 1.1, IJLPP, 1, 26-31 (2014-15), https://docs.manupatra.in/, last seen on 20/01/2017.

[1] Raman, R. (n.d.). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIA, THE UNITED STATES AND THE UNITED KINGDOM. In LAW MANTRA THINK BEYOND OTHERS (Vol. 3, Issue 10). https://journal.lawmantra.co.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/18.pdf

[2] S.P.Sathe, Judicial Activism in India, 2nd. Edition-,Oxford India Paper Backs, P.1.

³ Arthur T. von Mehran ,Peter L. Murray, Law in the United States, Cambridge University Press, 2 nd Edition, p.134.

[4] A comparative study on judicial review in India and USA. (n.d.). https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article 7332-a-comparative-study-on-judicial-review-in-india-and-usa.html

[5] (1952) SCR 597 (1952) SCJ 253, AIR 1952 SC196

[7] http://www.preservearticles.com/2011100314414/essay-on-the-indian-supreme-court-unlike-the-us-supreme-court.html

[8] http://archives.dawn.com/archives/67335,%2021.10.13

[9] http://vishwabhushan.blogspot.in/2011/09/judicial-review-concept-origin-and.html,%2021.10.13

[10] About the Supreme Court. (n.d.). United States Courts. https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/about#:~:text=The%20best%2Dknown%20power%20of,Madison%20(1803).

[11] Judicial review in the United States | Office of Justice Programs. (n.d.). https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/judicial-review-united-states

[12] Marbury v. Madison. (n.d.). Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/Marbury-v-Madison/additional-info

[14]. Prof. Wade, Sir Edward Coke, Judge Spencer Roane, Samuel Chase, Marshall CJ, & Prof. Edwin Corwin. (n.d.). Judicial Review- scope, ambit and dimensions. https://nja.gov.in/Concluded_Programmes/2018-19/P-1110_PPTs/13.Sunday%20Club%20talk%20(Judicial%20Review).pdf

^{^[15]} International Journal of Law Management & Humanities. (2021, June 27). A Comparative Analysis of the Doctrine of Judicial Review in India and the U.S.A - International Journal of Law Management & Humanities. https://ijlmh.com/paper/a-comparative-analysis-of-the-doctrine-of-judicial-review-in-india-and-the-u-s-a/

[16] Shankari Prasad v. Union of India, MANU/SC/0013/1951

[17] Judicial review in the United States | Office of Justice Programs. (n.d.-b). https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/judicial-review-united-states

[18] Wikipedia contributors. (2023, September 13). Weeks v. United States. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weeks_v._United_States#:~:text=United%20States%2C%20232%20U.S.%20383,Amendment%20to%20the%20U.S.%20Constitution.

[19] McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) | National Archives. (n.d.). https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/mcculloch-v-maryland

[20] Free Speech Center. (2024, February 19). Reed v. Town of Gilbert (2015) - The Free Speech Center. The Free Speech Center. https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/reed-v-town-of-gilbert/

[21] Testbook. (2024, January 18). Golaknath Case - History, Summary, Arguments & Judgement | UPSC. Testbook. https://testbook.com/ias-preparation/golaknath-case

^{^[23]} Wikipedia contributors. (2023b, December 23). Vishakha and others v State of Rajasthan. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vishakha_and_others_v_State_of_Rajasthan

[24] Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record- Association and Another v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 13 of 2015 (October 16, 2015).

^[1] Tolley V. Fry (1931) AC 333; (1931) 1 All ER Rep 131.

^[2] Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1.

^[3] Titan Industries Ltd. vs Ramkumar Jewellers, 2012 SCC OnLine Del 2382.

^[4] Souvanik Mullick and Swati Narnaulia, "Protecting Celebrity Rights Through Intellectual Property Conceptions", Volume 1 Issue 4 NUJS Law Review 615 (2008), available at: https://nujslawreview.org/2016/12/03/protecting-celebrity-rights-through-intellectual-property-conceptions/ (last visited March 15, 2024).

^[5] Titan Industries Ltd. vs Ramkumar Jewellers, 2012 SCC OnLine Del 2382.

^[6] R Raja Gopal v State of Tamil Nadu, 1995 AIR 264

^[7] R Raja Gopal v State of Tamil Nadu, 1995 AIR 264, para 9

^[8] Vikrant Rana, Nihit Nagpal and Akif Abidi, "Personality rights from Amitabh Bachchan to Sushant Singh to Anil Kapoor: Indian and Global View Point", Bar and Bench, November 03, 2023, available at: https://www.barandbench.com/law-firms/view-point/personality-rights-amitabh-bachchan-sushant-singh-anil-kapoor-indian-and-global-view-point (last visited on March 16, 2024).

^[9] The Trade Marks Act, 1999 (Act No. 47 of 1999).

^[10] The Trade Marks Act, 1999 (Act No. 47 of 1999), s.2(1)(m).

^[11] The Copyright Act, 1957 (Act No. 14 of 1957).

^[12] The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Act No. 21 of 2000).

^[13] The Indian Penal Code 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860).

^[14] The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Act No. 45 of 2023).

^[15] The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Act 21 of 2000).

^[16] Ranjan Narula, "AI in conflict with personality rights in India", ManagingIP, October 06, 2023, available at: https://www.managingip.com/article/2ca8psx7p9fyiwd4h2ps0/expert-analysis/local-insights/ai-in-conflict-with-personality-rights-in-india (last visited on March 17, 2024).

^[18] Nandini Yadav, "India moves to regulate AI tools, experts say too much: Story in 5 points", India Today, March 4, 2024, available at: https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/features/story/india-moves-to-regulate-ai-tools-experts-say-too-much-story-in-5-points-2510337-2024-03-04 (last visited on March 17, 2024).

^[19] Nupur Thapliyal, "Delhi High Court Protects Actor Anil Kapoor’s Personality Rights, Restrains Use Of His Name, Image Or Voice Without Consent", Live Law, September 20, 2023, available at: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/delhi-high-court-anil-kapoor-voice-image-misuse-personality-rights-238217 (last visited on March 17, 2024).

^[21] Shivaji Rao Gaikwad vs Varsha Production, 2015 (62) PTC 351 (Madras)

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

THE ROLE OF PRESUMPTION AND MAXIMS IN STATUTORY INTERPRETATION: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS BY - PALVE SHUBHAM LAHUDAS

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGES IN INDIA AND SELECTED COUNTRIES BY - PALVE SHUBHAM LAHUDAS

PATENT WARS IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY: BALANCING ACCESS TO MEDICINE AND INNOVATION BY - NEHA SHARMA & DR SUPERNA VENAIK

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION AND THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 2019 BY : ADV. PALLAVI NITIN PAWAR

‘JURIS MEDICA NEXUS’: UNRAVELING MEDICO – LEGAL DYNAMICS IN INDIAN HEALTHCARE JURISPRUDENCE BY - VANSHIKA TEWARI

THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF CARTELS IN THE INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM BY- NINAD BOHIDAR

LEVERAGING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO REVOLUTIONIZE THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY BY - *SMITA PRAKASH

THE ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT TO SAFEGUARD AND INTERPRET THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY - ADV. NUPUR SHRIRAM KULKARNI

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIA AND USA BY: PRATHAMESH DILIP AHINAVE

PROTECTION OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS IN THE DIGITAL AGE BY: ABHISHEK YADAV & DR TARU MISHRA

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2