INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF CARTELS IN THE INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM BY- NINAD BOHIDAR

Authors: NINAD BOHIDAR

Registration ID: 107283 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7283

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

LEVERAGING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO REVOLUTIONIZE THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY BY - *SMITA PRAKASH

Authors: SMITA PRAKASH

Registration ID: 107282 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7282

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

THE ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT TO SAFEGUARD AND INTERPRET THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY - ADV. NUPUR SHRIRAM KULKARNI

Authors: ADV. NUPUR SHRIRAM KULKARNI

Registration ID: 107281 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7281

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIA AND USA BY: PRATHAMESH DILIP AHINAVE

Authors: PRATHAMESH DILIP AHINAVE

Registration ID: 107280 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7280

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

PROTECTION OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS IN THE DIGITAL AGE BY: ABHISHEK YADAV & DR TARU MISHRA

Authors: ABHISHEK YADAV & DR TARU MISHRA

Registration ID: 107278 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7278 & IJLRA7283

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

A SOCIOLOGICAL INPUT - WOMEN IN PRISON BY - AYAN A. HAQ

Authors: AYAN A. HAQ

Registration ID: 107277 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7277

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: ayanhaq34@nalsar.ac.in

Page No: 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

BANK NATIONAZATION AND SOCIAL CONTROL OVER BANKING BY - NISHA MARUTI BHALEKAR

Authors: NISHA MARUTI BHALEKAR

Registration ID: 107276 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7276

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: nishabhalekar2@gmail.com

Page No: 20 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

RIGHT TO ACCESS THE INTERNET IN INDIA AS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT BY - SHAURYA PRATAP SINGH, DIVYANSH SARATHE, VIKRANT AHLAWAT & DR. VIVEK KUMAR

Authors: SHAURYA PRATAP SINGH, DIVYANSH SARATHE, VIKRANT AHLAWAT & DR. VIVEK KUMAR

Registration ID: 107272 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7272, IJLRA7273, IJLRA7274 & IJLRA7275

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: singhshauryapratap2002@gmail.com, Divyansh0418@gmail.com, vikrantahlawat2307@gmail.com & dr.vivek@iudehradun.edu.in

Page No: 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

CASE REVIEW: TUKARAM V. STATE OF MAHARASTRA BY - SHROTAPANNA MISHRA

Authors: SHROTAPANNA MISHRA

Registration ID: 107271 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7271

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: shrotamisra@gmail.com

Page No: 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

CONCURRENT POWERS OF LEGISLATION UNDER LIST III OF THE CONSTITUTION BY: VAISHNAVI PRASHANT YADAV

Authors: VAISHNAVI PRASHANT YADAV

Registration ID: 107270 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA7270

Year: April-2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

Email Id: vaishnaviyadav6009@gmail.com

Page No: 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] The Constitution of India, 1949, Art. 19(1)(g)

[4] Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969

[6] Sharddha Jain, Competition Law in India, iPleaders, (last visited 02.03.2024), Available at - https://blog.ipleaders.in/competition-law-in-india-2/#Emergence_of_Competition_Act_2002

[7] Sabapriya Ray, Emergence and Applicability of Competition Act, 2002 in India’s New Competitive Regime, IISTE, Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, ISSN 224-3259, Vol.1,2011.

[9] Chandler, Alfred D. Jr. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Belknap Press, 1977.

[10] Jones, Geoffrey. "The Growth of Cartels in Europe, 1900-1939." European Review of Economic History, vol. 1, no. 1, 1997, pp. 89-115.

[11] Https://globalcompetitionreview.com/review/the-asia-pacific-antitrust-review/2022/article/india-cartels

[12] Director, Supplies & Disposals, Haryana v Shree Cement Limited and Ors (Case No. Case No. 5 of 2013)

[13] Western Coalfields v SSV Coal Carriers Private Limited (Case No. 34 of 2015).

[14] In re Cartelisation by Broadcasting service providers by rigging bids submitted in response to the tenders floated by Sports Broadcasters (Suo motu Case No. 2 of 2013)

[15] Delhi Jal Board v Grasim Industries Ltd (Ref Case Nos. 3 and 4 of 2013).

[16] Alleged Anti-competitive conduct in Beer Market in India (suo motu Case No. 06 of 2017)

[17] Ms. Shikha Roy v Jet Airways (India) Limited and Ors (Case No 32 of 2016).

[18] Builder’s Association of India v CMA and Ors (Case No. 29 of 2010)

[19] Abhir Roay And Nishchal Joshipura, “Cartels in India”, Competition Law Insight (January 12, 2010), https://www.nishithdesai.com/Content/document/pdf/ResearchArticles/Cartels%20in%20India.pdf

[19] (1968) 3 ALL ER 721.

[20] Paolo Buccirossi (2006). “Does Parallel Behaviour Provide Some Evidence of Collusion”, LEAR –

Rome <http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1027&context=rle>

[21] DAF/COMP/GF/WD (2006). 37,“Contribution from Brazil”, Roundtable on Prosecuting Cartels

Without Direct Evidence of Agreement, Global Forum on Competition

[22] Dayal, P and Agarwal, M (2006). “State Government Policies and Competition”, Towards a functional

competition policy for India, Pradeep S Mehta (Ed), CUTS International & Academic Foundation

[25] In re: Sugar Mills, Case No. 1 of 2010 (CCI).

[26] Suo Motu Case Against LPG Cylinder Manufacturers, In re, [2012] CCI

[27] All India Tyre Dealers’ Federation v. Tyre Manufacturers, 2012 SCC CCI 65

[28] Builders Assn. of India v. Cement Manufacturers’ Assn., 2016 SCC CCI 46

[32] Aditya Kalra and Aditi Shah, Exclusive: Carlsberg, United Breweries plead leniency in India Beer Cartel Probe – Sources, Reuters (Last Visited 13-2-2024, 7.10 p.m.), https://www.reuters.com/article/india-regulator-brewers/exclusivecarlsberg-united-breweries-plead-leniency-in-india-beer-cartel-probe-sources-idINKBN1OC1QQ

[33] Avirup Bose, Circumstantial Evidence and Dawn Raids: A New Era of Antitrust Investigation in India (4-4-2013) Competition Law Reports, April 2013

[35] Aluminium Phosphide Tablets Manufacturers, In re, 2012 CCI 23.

[36] Builders Assn. of India v. Cement Manufacturers’ Assn., 2012 CCI 42.

[37]Suo Motu Case Against LPG Cylinder Manufacturers, In re, 2012 CCI 1

*The Author is an LL.M. student at Amity Law School, Amity University, Noida.

[1]https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/healthcare/biotech/pharmaceuticals/how-ai-is-changing-the-pharmaceutical-industry-in-india/articleshow/104101842.cms?from=mdr. Last visited: 11^th Apr.’24.

[2] Laurence H. Tribe, Soundings and Silences, 115 Mich. L. Rev. Online 26 (2016), available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr_online/vol115/iss1/3 last seen on 29/03/17.

[5] Dr Justice A.S. Anand Justice N.D. Krishna Rao Memorial Lecture Protection of Human Rights — Judicial

Obligation or Judicial Activism, (1997) 7 SCC (Jour) 1.

[6] State of Himachal Pradesh v. Kailash Chand Mahajan, 1992 AIR 1277, 1992 SCR (1) 917.

[7] Union of India v. Elphinstone Spinning and Weaving Co. Ltd., (2001) 4 SCC 139.

[17] Maneka Gandhi v. union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248: AIR 1978 SC 597.S

[18] S.R. Chaudhuri v. State of Punjab, (2001) 7 SCC 126.

[22] Constitution of India, article 132,133,134 and 136.

[29] A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 27.

[30] Pandit M. S. M. Sharma V. Shri Sri Krishna Sinha and Others, AIR 1959 SC 395.

[31] Express Newspapers Private. Ltd. and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors., 1986 AIR 872, 1985 SCR Supl. (3) 382.

[32] Sakal Papers (P) Ltd. v. The Union of India, 1962 3 SCR 842.

[33] Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, (1973) 4 SCC 225: AIR 1973 SC 1461.

[34] Chiranjit Lal Chowdhuri v. The Union of India and Ors., AIR 1951 SC 41.

[36] Devdatta Mukherjee, Judicial Implementation of Directive Principles of State Policy: Critical Perspectives, Volume 1.1, IJLPP, 1, 26-31 (2014-15), https://docs.manupatra.in/, last seen on 20/01/2017.

[1] Raman, R. (n.d.). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIA, THE UNITED STATES AND THE UNITED KINGDOM. In LAW MANTRA THINK BEYOND OTHERS (Vol. 3, Issue 10). https://journal.lawmantra.co.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/18.pdf

[2] S.P.Sathe, Judicial Activism in India, 2nd. Edition-,Oxford India Paper Backs, P.1.

³ Arthur T. von Mehran ,Peter L. Murray, Law in the United States, Cambridge University Press, 2 nd Edition, p.134.

[4] A comparative study on judicial review in India and USA. (n.d.). https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article 7332-a-comparative-study-on-judicial-review-in-india-and-usa.html

[5] (1952) SCR 597 (1952) SCJ 253, AIR 1952 SC196

[7] http://www.preservearticles.com/2011100314414/essay-on-the-indian-supreme-court-unlike-the-us-supreme-court.html

[8] http://archives.dawn.com/archives/67335,%2021.10.13

[9] http://vishwabhushan.blogspot.in/2011/09/judicial-review-concept-origin-and.html,%2021.10.13

[10] About the Supreme Court. (n.d.). United States Courts. https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/about#:~:text=The%20best%2Dknown%20power%20of,Madison%20(1803).

[11] Judicial review in the United States | Office of Justice Programs. (n.d.). https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/judicial-review-united-states

[12] Marbury v. Madison. (n.d.). Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/Marbury-v-Madison/additional-info

[14]. Prof. Wade, Sir Edward Coke, Judge Spencer Roane, Samuel Chase, Marshall CJ, & Prof. Edwin Corwin. (n.d.). Judicial Review- scope, ambit and dimensions. https://nja.gov.in/Concluded_Programmes/2018-19/P-1110_PPTs/13.Sunday%20Club%20talk%20(Judicial%20Review).pdf

^{^[15]} International Journal of Law Management & Humanities. (2021, June 27). A Comparative Analysis of the Doctrine of Judicial Review in India and the U.S.A - International Journal of Law Management & Humanities. https://ijlmh.com/paper/a-comparative-analysis-of-the-doctrine-of-judicial-review-in-india-and-the-u-s-a/

[16] Shankari Prasad v. Union of India, MANU/SC/0013/1951

[17] Judicial review in the United States | Office of Justice Programs. (n.d.-b). https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/judicial-review-united-states

[18] Wikipedia contributors. (2023, September 13). Weeks v. United States. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weeks_v._United_States#:~:text=United%20States%2C%20232%20U.S.%20383,Amendment%20to%20the%20U.S.%20Constitution.

[19] McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) | National Archives. (n.d.). https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/mcculloch-v-maryland

[20] Free Speech Center. (2024, February 19). Reed v. Town of Gilbert (2015) - The Free Speech Center. The Free Speech Center. https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/reed-v-town-of-gilbert/

[21] Testbook. (2024, January 18). Golaknath Case - History, Summary, Arguments & Judgement | UPSC. Testbook. https://testbook.com/ias-preparation/golaknath-case

^{^[23]} Wikipedia contributors. (2023b, December 23). Vishakha and others v State of Rajasthan. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vishakha_and_others_v_State_of_Rajasthan

[24] Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record- Association and Another v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 13 of 2015 (October 16, 2015).

^[1] Tolley V. Fry (1931) AC 333; (1931) 1 All ER Rep 131.

^[2] Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1.

^[3] Titan Industries Ltd. vs Ramkumar Jewellers, 2012 SCC OnLine Del 2382.

^[4] Souvanik Mullick and Swati Narnaulia, "Protecting Celebrity Rights Through Intellectual Property Conceptions", Volume 1 Issue 4 NUJS Law Review 615 (2008), available at: https://nujslawreview.org/2016/12/03/protecting-celebrity-rights-through-intellectual-property-conceptions/ (last visited March 15, 2024).

^[5] Titan Industries Ltd. vs Ramkumar Jewellers, 2012 SCC OnLine Del 2382.

^[6] R Raja Gopal v State of Tamil Nadu, 1995 AIR 264

^[7] R Raja Gopal v State of Tamil Nadu, 1995 AIR 264, para 9

^[8] Vikrant Rana, Nihit Nagpal and Akif Abidi, "Personality rights from Amitabh Bachchan to Sushant Singh to Anil Kapoor: Indian and Global View Point", Bar and Bench, November 03, 2023, available at: https://www.barandbench.com/law-firms/view-point/personality-rights-amitabh-bachchan-sushant-singh-anil-kapoor-indian-and-global-view-point (last visited on March 16, 2024).

^[9] The Trade Marks Act, 1999 (Act No. 47 of 1999).

^[10] The Trade Marks Act, 1999 (Act No. 47 of 1999), s.2(1)(m).

^[11] The Copyright Act, 1957 (Act No. 14 of 1957).

^[12] The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Act No. 21 of 2000).

^[13] The Indian Penal Code 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860).

^[14] The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Act No. 45 of 2023).

^[15] The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Act 21 of 2000).

^[16] Ranjan Narula, "AI in conflict with personality rights in India", ManagingIP, October 06, 2023, available at: https://www.managingip.com/article/2ca8psx7p9fyiwd4h2ps0/expert-analysis/local-insights/ai-in-conflict-with-personality-rights-in-india (last visited on March 17, 2024).

^[18] Nandini Yadav, "India moves to regulate AI tools, experts say too much: Story in 5 points", India Today, March 4, 2024, available at: https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/features/story/india-moves-to-regulate-ai-tools-experts-say-too-much-story-in-5-points-2510337-2024-03-04 (last visited on March 17, 2024).

^[19] Nupur Thapliyal, "Delhi High Court Protects Actor Anil Kapoor’s Personality Rights, Restrains Use Of His Name, Image Or Voice Without Consent", Live Law, September 20, 2023, available at: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/delhi-high-court-anil-kapoor-voice-image-misuse-personality-rights-238217 (last visited on March 17, 2024).

^[21] Shivaji Rao Gaikwad vs Varsha Production, 2015 (62) PTC 351 (Madras)

[1] Kruttschnitt, C. (no date) Women’s imprisonment, Jstor. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1147696.pdf?refreqid=fastly-default%3A6022a8cc57da7f3778c9575877bc118b&ab_segments=0%2Fbasic_search_gsv2%2Fcontrol&origin=&initiator=&acceptTC=1 (Accessed: 09 October 2023).

[2] IN 1940 CLEMMER DEFINED PRISONIZATION AS THE ASSIMILATION OF DEVIANT NORMS, VALUES, AND MORE OF THE INMATE CULTURE INTO AN INMATE'S PERSONALITY. HE CONSIDERED THIS TO BE A NATURAL ADAPTATION BASED ON AN ATTEMPT TO ESTABLISH AN IDENTITY WITHIN THE PRISON SOCIAL ORGANIZATION.

[3] WOMEN'S PRISON: SEX AND SOCIAL STRUCTURE. By David A. Ward and Gene G. Kassebaum. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1965. 269 pp.

[4] Women in prisons India. Available at: https://wcd.nic.in/sites/default/files/Prison%20Report%20Compiled.pdf (Accessed: 09 October 2023).

[5] Kruttschnitt, C. (no date) Women’s imprisonment, Jstor. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1147696.pdf?refreqid=fastly-default%3A6022a8cc57da7f3778c9575877bc118b&ab_segments=0%2Fbasic_search_gsv2%2Fcontrol&origin=&initiator=&acceptTC=1 (Accessed: 09 October 2023).

[6] From the Women's Prison: Third World Women's Narratives of Prison, Barbara Harlow, Feminist Studies , Autumn, 1986, Vol. 12, No. 3 (Autumn, 1986), pp. 501-524

[7] Recidivism is one of the most fundamental concepts in criminal justice. It refers to a person's relapse into criminal behavior, often after the person receives sanctions or undergoes intervention for a previous crime.

[8] Women in prisons India. Available at: https://wcd.nic.in/sites/default/files/Prison%20Report%20Compiled.pdf (Accessed: 09 October 2023).

[9] Sexual Revictimization and Retraumatization of Women in Prison, Danielle Dirks, Women's Studies Quarterly , Fall - Winter, 2004, Vol. 32, No. 3/4, Women, Crime, and the Criminal Justice System (Fall - Winter, 2004), pp. 102-115

[10] Women’s rights behind walls, Mechthild Nagel, Criminal justice in Nigeria, Colonial systems of control, University of Ottawa press, https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1ckph37.18

[11] Our Prisons Punitive or Rehabilitative? An Analysis of Theory and Practice, Pluto Journals, Rais GulSource: Policy Perspectives, Vol. 15, No. 3 (2018), pp. 67-83

^{^[12]} Feinman, C. (no date) Women in the criminal justice system. Available at: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/women-criminal-justice-system-1 (Accessed: 09 October 2023).

^{^[1]} Indian Penal Code, 1860 | https://indiankanoon.org/doc/203036/

^{^[2]} Indian Penal Code, 1860 | https://indiankanoon.org/doc/623254/

^{^[3]} Indian Evidence Act, 1872 | https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1505766/

^{^[4]} Tukaram v. State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 10]

^{^[5]} Tukaram v. State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 9]

^{^[6]} Tukaram v. State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 5] (reference for argument A) and B))

^{^[7]} Tukaram v. State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 6]

^{^[8]} Tukaram v. State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 9]

^{^[9]} Tukaram v. State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 10]

^{^[10]} Tukaram v State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 10]

^{^[11]} Tukaram v State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 11]

^{^[13]} Tukaram v State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 12]

^{^[14]} Tukaram v State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 14]

^{^[15]} Tukaram v State of Maharastra (1979) 2 SCC 143 [Para 19]

^{^[16]} Chintan Chandrachud, The Cases that India Forgot [Page 70]

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF CARTELS IN THE INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM BY- NINAD BOHIDAR

LEVERAGING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO REVOLUTIONIZE THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY BY - *SMITA PRAKASH

THE ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT TO SAFEGUARD AND INTERPRET THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY - ADV. NUPUR SHRIRAM KULKARNI

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIA AND USA BY: PRATHAMESH DILIP AHINAVE

PROTECTION OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS IN THE DIGITAL AGE BY: ABHISHEK YADAV & DR TARU MISHRA

A SOCIOLOGICAL INPUT - WOMEN IN PRISON BY - AYAN A. HAQ

BANK NATIONAZATION AND SOCIAL CONTROL OVER BANKING BY - NISHA MARUTI BHALEKAR

RIGHT TO ACCESS THE INTERNET IN INDIA AS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT BY - SHAURYA PRATAP SINGH, DIVYANSH SARATHE, VIKRANT AHLAWAT & DR. VIVEK KUMAR

CASE REVIEW: TUKARAM V. STATE OF MAHARASTRA BY - SHROTAPANNA MISHRA

CONCURRENT POWERS OF LEGISLATION UNDER LIST III OF THE CONSTITUTION BY: VAISHNAVI PRASHANT YADAV

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2