INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

THE NEED OF AN EXTENSIVE SOPRTS LAW IN INDIA BY - ABINAYA SAIKUMAR

Authors : ABINAYA SAIKUMAR

Registration ID : 105985 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5985

Year : Sep -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : abinayasaikumar18@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2023-34188887/THE NEED OF AN EXTENSIVE SOPRTS

ANALYSIS OF NEW RULE OF BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA - FOREIGN LAWYERS AND LAW FIRMS TO PRACTICE IN INDIA. BY - RADHA SHARMA

Authors : RADHA SHARMA

Registration ID : 105984 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5984

Year : Sep -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : drsharmaradha12345@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2023-46514861/ANALYSIS OF NEW RULE OF BAR COUNCIL

A SHORT NOTE ON GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE BY - AJAY SINGH & SHIVANGI PANDEY

Authors : AJAY SINGH & SHIVANGI PANDEY

Registration ID : 105982 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5982 & IJLRA5983

Year : Sep -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : iajaysinghh@gmail.com & shivangipandeypcs@gmail.com

Page No : 10 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2023-56494291/A SHORT NOTE ON GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN INDIA BY: SRISHTI VASANDANI

Authors : SRISHTI VASANDANI

Registration ID : 105981 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5981

Year : Sep -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : Srishvasandani@gmail.com

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2023-98511889/CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN INDIA

ANALYSIS OF INDIA V. PAKISTAN (JADHAV CASE): INTERNATIONAL LEGAL IMPLICATIONS AND DIPLOMATIC TENSION BY: AYUSHI A. MALIK

Authors : AYUSHI A. MALIK

Registration ID : 105980 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5980

Year : Sep -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : ayushimalik63@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2023-34973219/ANALYSIS OF INDIA V. PAKISTAN

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN INDIA A CONTRAST AND DEVELOPMENT BY - NABIL RAZA

Authors : NABIL RAZA

Registration ID : 105979 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5979

Year : Sep -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : razanabil72@gmail.com

Page No : 23 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2023-28876978/CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

PROTECTION OF MEN FROM HARASSMENT IN INDIA: AN ANALYSIS OF LEGAL PROVISIONS BY - SHREYA PATNI

Authors : SHREYA PATNI

Registration ID : 105978 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5978

Year : Sep -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : jainpatnishreya@gmail.com

Page No : 20 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2023-72118538/PROTECTION OF MEN

NAVIGATING CONSENT AND DECEPTION: A LEGAL AND ETHICAL ANALYSIS OF SEXUAL RELATIONS ON FALSE PROMISES OF MARRIAGE BY - RAHUL PATHANIA

Authors : RAHUL PATHANIA

Registration ID : 105977 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5977

Year : Sep -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : Pathaniarahul4265@gmail.com

Page No : 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2023-73326566/NAVIGATING CONSENT AND DECEPTION

THE ROLE OF WHISTLEBLOWER IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN UNCOVERING CORPORATE CRIMES: A COMPARITIVE LEGAL AND ETHICAL ANALYSIS WITH UK AND USA BY - SNEHAL UPADHYAY

Authors : SNEHAL UPADHYAY

Registration ID : 105976 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5976

Year : Sep -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : snehalupadhyay0909@gmail.com

Page No : 26 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2023-77517789/THE ROLE OF WHISTLEBLOWER

ADMISSIBILITY OF DNA FINGERPRINTING IN THE INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM BY - SNIGDHA SOOD

Authors : SNIGDHA SOOD

Registration ID : 105975 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5975

Year : Sep -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : snigdhasood95@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2023-43869749/ADMISSIBILITY OF DNA

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language, College Edition, 1968.

[2] E Grayson, Sport and the Law 47 (Bloomsbury Professional, 2nd ed., 1994).

[4] Annaliese Nelson, When, Where and Why Does the State Intervene in Sport: A Contemporary perspective, Epublications.bond.edu (2005), available at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=slej (last visited April 7, 2017).

[7] Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting v. Cricket Association of Bengal, AIR 1995 SC 1236.

[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sports_Authority_of_India.

[11] Grayson E., former President of the British Association for Sport and Law, in his inaugural presidential address 1 (1) Sport and the Law Journal, 1993.

[12] Annual Report - 08, Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports (Govt. of India). : 59, 2007.

[13] Zee Telefilms and Others v. Union of India & Others, (2005) 4 SCC 649.

[18] W.P. (C) 2310/2012, CM APPL.4946 & 17545/2012.

[19] Sport for Development and Peace, UN General Assembly Resolution, November 3 2003, at http://www.un.org/wcm/content/site/sport/home/resourcecenter/resolutions/pid/19431.

[1] Haniraj L. Chulani v. Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, AIR 1996 SC 1708

[2] In the matter of Madhav Singh, AIR 1923 Pat 185

[3] C.L. Anand, General Principles of Legal Ethics, p. 39

[4] Bar Council of India Rules, Rule 8 Chapter IV

[8] Lawyers Collective vs. Bar Council of India, 2010 (2) Mah LJ 726.

[9] AK Balaji Vs. Government of India AIR 2012 Mad 124

[11] Bar Council of India Vs. A.K. The Balaji, (2018) 5 SCC379

[2] (1997) 6 SCC 241for further inquiry visit "Sexual harassment at workplace". The Indian Express. 26 January 2010.

[3] (2011) 4 SCC 454

For further inquiry visit news.biharprabha.com. 18 May 2015.

[2] 354. Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty—Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any woman, intending to outrage or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby outrage her modesty, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

[3] 498A. Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty—Whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine. Explanation—For the purpose of this section, “cruelty” means—

(a) any wilful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman; or

(b) harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.

[4] https://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A2013-14.pdf

[5] https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/1920/1/a1989-33.pdf

[6] https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/pdfs/ukpga_20100015_en.pdf 01/31/2023 Tuesday 08:06 P.M

[7] https://dst.gov.in/internal-complaints-committeeicc-women

[8] 509. Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman.—Whoever, intending to insult the modesty of any woman, utters any word, makes any sound or gesture, or exhibits any object, intending that such word or sound shall be heard, or that such gesture or object shall be seen, by such woman, or intrudes upon the privacy of such woman, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.

[10] 1997 IVAD Delhi 646, 68 (1997) DLT 303, 1997 (42) DRJ 526

[11] 24 December, 197- AIR 1977 Delhi 209, ILR 1977 Delhi 659

[12] Priya Darshini Arora vs State on 27 October, 2020

^{^[1]} Rape- A man is said to commit “rape” if he—

(a) penetrates his penis, to any extent, into the vagina, mouth, urethra or anus of a woman or makes her to do so with him or any other person; or

(b) inserts, to any extent, any object or a part of the body, not being the penis, into the vagina, the urethra or anus of a woman or makes her to do so with him or any other person; or

(c) manipulates any part of the body of a woman so as to cause penetration into the vagina, urethra, anus or any part of body of such woman or makes her to do so with him or any other person; or

(d) applies his mouth to the vagina, anus, urethra of a woman or makes her to do so with him or any other person, under the circumstances falling under any of the following seven descriptions:— First.—Against her will. Secondly.—Without her consent. Thirdly.—With her consent, when her consent has been obtained by putting her or any person in whom she is interested, in fear of death or of hurt. Fourthly.—With her consent, when the man knows that he is not her husband and that her consent is given because she believes that he is another man to whom she is or believes herself to be lawfully married.

Fifthly.—With her consent when, at the time of giving such consent, by reason of unsoundness of mind or intoxication or the administration by him personally or through another of any stupefying or unwholesome substance, she is unable to understand the nature and consequences of that to which she gives consent. Sixthly.—With or without her consent, when she is under eighteen years of age. Seventhly.—When she is unable to communicate consent.

^{^[2]} Deepak Gulati v. State of Haryana, AIR 2013 SC 2071.

^{^[3]} Section 90- Consent known to be given under fear of misconception: A consent is not such a consent as it intended by any section of this Code if the consent is given by a person under fear of injury, or under a misconception of fact, and if the person doing the act knows, or has reason to believe, that the consent was given in consequence of such fear or misconception.

^{^[4]} Yedla Srinivasa Rao v State of A.P 2006 11 SC 615

^{^[6]} Deepak Gulati v. State of Haryana, AIR 2013 SC 2071.

^{^[7]} State of Uttar Pradesh v Naushad 2023 16 SSC 651

^{^[8]} Sachin @ Devendra Gajanand Sangray v State of Gujrat Criminal Misc. no. 15688/2014

^{^[9]} Anurag Soni v State of Chattisgarh Criminal Appeal No. 629/2019

[2] Edited by by Robert G. Vaughn and Meghan J. Ryan

[5] Ramalinga Raju v. Union of India, (2015) 5 SCC 178.

[6] Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services Limited and its subsidiaries, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1036 of 2018 (Delhi High Court Nov. 15, 2018).

[7] The Meaning of WikiLeaks' Stratfor Emails

[8] Professor of philosophy at the Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago, Illinois, USA.

[9] Satyendra Dubey vs Union of India & Others

[10] State of Uttar Pradesh v. Pawan Kumar Mittal and Others

[11] United States of America vs. Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited [1:13-cr-00118-RBW-1]

[14] Royal Mail Group Limited v Jhuti [2017] UKSC 55.

[15] Chesterton Global Limited v Nurmohamed [2017] EWCA Civ 979.

[16] Clyde & Co LLP and anor v Bates van Winkelhof [2014] UKSC 32.

[17] Van Asdale v. International Game Technology [2:08-cv-01347-RCJ-PAL]

[1]Advocate Snigdha Sood, LL.M. (2021-22) Panjab University, LL.B., Panjab University, Chandigarh M.A. (English), University of Delhi B.A. (Hons.) English, University of Delhi

[2] Ian Cobain, “Killer breakthrough – the day DNA evidence first nailed a murderer”, The Guardian, 07/06/2017, available at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jun/07/killer-dna-evidence-genetic-profiling-criminal-investigation

[4] Jeffreys AJ, Allen MJ, Hagelberg E, Sonnberg A. Identification of the skeletal remains of Josef Mengele by DNA analysis. Forensic Sci Int. 1992 Sep;56(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/0379-0738(92)90148-p. PMID: 1398379.

[5] Joseph Neff, “They Did 30 Years for Someone Else’s Crime. Then Paid for It.”, The New York Times, 07/04/2018, available at https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/07/us/mccollum-brown-exoneration.html

[6] ACLU “DNA Testing and The Death Penalty” available at https://www.aclu.org/other/dna-testing-and-death-penalty

[7] Pantangi Balarama Venkata Ganesh vs. state of Andhra Pradesh, 2003 crlj 4508(AP)

[8] Ashok Bhan, “DNA and the Indian System”, The Statesman, 07/06/2018, available at https://www.thestatesman.com/supplements/law/dna-indian-system-1502645292.html

[9] The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), s.53

[10] The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005 (25 Of 2005)

[11] Editor, “Constitutionality of Sec 53A Upheld” SCC Online, 17/12/2014, available at https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2014/12/17/constitutionality-of-section-53-a-crpc-upheld/

[12] Shreemad Jagadguru Shankaracharya v State of Karnataka, 2014 SCC Online Kar 5639

[14] Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), s. 112

[18] Bhabani Prasad Jena v.Convener Secretary, Orissa State Commission for Women and Another (2010) 8 SCC 633

[19] State Through C.B.I vs Amaramani Tripathi Appeal (crl) 1248 of 2005

[21] The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), s. 125

[24] Govind Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1961 MP 320, 1961 12 STC 825 MP

[26] State of Bombay Vs Kathikalu AIR 1961 SC 1808

[27] Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), s. 9, 11.

[28] Madan Gopal Kakkad vs. Naval Dubey and Another 1992 AIR SCW 1480

[29] Machindra vs. Sajjan Galpha Rankhamb Criminal appeal number 1794 of 2013,D.O.J April 19,2017.J P.C Ghose and R.F.Nariman

[30] State of Bombay Vs Kathikalu AIR 1961 SC 1808

[31] Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2017) 7 SCC 263

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

THE NEED OF AN EXTENSIVE SOPRTS LAW IN INDIA BY - ABINAYA SAIKUMAR

ANALYSIS OF NEW RULE OF BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA - FOREIGN LAWYERS AND LAW FIRMS TO PRACTICE IN INDIA. BY - RADHA SHARMA

A SHORT NOTE ON GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE BY - AJAY SINGH & SHIVANGI PANDEY

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN INDIA BY: SRISHTI VASANDANI

ANALYSIS OF INDIA V. PAKISTAN (JADHAV CASE): INTERNATIONAL LEGAL IMPLICATIONS AND DIPLOMATIC TENSION BY: AYUSHI A. MALIK

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN INDIA A CONTRAST AND DEVELOPMENT BY - NABIL RAZA

PROTECTION OF MEN FROM HARASSMENT IN INDIA: AN ANALYSIS OF LEGAL PROVISIONS BY - SHREYA PATNI

NAVIGATING CONSENT AND DECEPTION: A LEGAL AND ETHICAL ANALYSIS OF SEXUAL RELATIONS ON FALSE PROMISES OF MARRIAGE BY - RAHUL PATHANIA

THE ROLE OF WHISTLEBLOWER IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN UNCOVERING CORPORATE CRIMES: A COMPARITIVE LEGAL AND ETHICAL ANALYSIS WITH UK AND USA BY - SNEHAL UPADHYAY

ADMISSIBILITY OF DNA FINGERPRINTING IN THE INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM BY - SNIGDHA SOOD

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2