INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

THE CREATION OF THE APEX COURT: A LOOK INTO IT’S PAST AND PRESENT BY - PRATYUSHA GHOSH

Authors: PRATYUSHA GHOSH

Registration ID: 105800 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5800

Year : June -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: pratyushaghosh44@gmail.com

Page No : 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://doi-ds.org/doilink/06.2023-34839817/THE CREATION

EVIL LURKS IN THE SHADOWS: MARITAL RAPE BY - PRATYUSHA GHOSH

Authors: PRATYUSHA GHOSH

Registration ID: 105799 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5799

Year : June -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: pratyushaghosh44@gmail.com

Page No : 10 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://doi-ds.org/doilink/06.2023-85855542/EVIL LURKS IN THE SHADOWS

RELIGIOUS NATIONALISM IN CONTEMPORARY INDIA BY - TANMAY BANSAL

Authors: TANMAY BANSAL

Registration ID: 105798 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5798

Year : June -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: tanmay.bansal03@gmail.com

Page No : 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://doi-ds.org/doilink/06.2023-18481186/RELIGIOUS NATIONALISM

DIGITAL FORENSICS IN INDIA: CHALLENGE OF PRIVACY IN HANDLING DIGITAL EVIDENCE BY - BEVAN AVIL PINTO

Authors: BEVAN AVIL PINTO

Registration ID: 1057947 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5797

Year : June -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: bevanpinto02@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://doi-ds.org/doilink/06.2023-48932319/DIGITAL FORENSICS IN INDIA

THE DOMINION OF INDIA: A TAIL OF 1947-1950 BY - TANMAY BANSAL

Authors: TANMAY BANSAL

Registration ID: 105796 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5796

Year : June -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: tanmay.bansal03@gmail.com

Page No : 10 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://doi-ds.org/doilink/06.2023-19788282/THE DOMINION OF INDIA

IMPORTANCE AND EFFECT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW AGAINST ACTION FOR RE-ASSESSMENT – ANALYSIS AND STUDY OF EMERGING TRENDS BY - SANJAY BANSAL & DR. ANNU BAHL MEHRA

Authors: SANJAY BANSAL & DR. ANNU BAHL MEHRA

Registration ID: 105794 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5794 & IJLRA5795

Year : June -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: bansalsenioradvocate@gmail.com

Page No : 24 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://doi-ds.org/doilink/06.2023-94555954/IMPORTANCE AND EFFECT

COMPENSATION SCHEME: A CRITICAL STUDY ON SURVIVORS OF SEXUAL OFFENCES BY - SHARDA & DR. AJEET KUMAR SINGH

Authors: SHARDA & DR. AJEET KUMAR SINGH

Registration ID: 105792 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5792 & IJLRA5763

Year : June -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: sharda_kv@yahoo.in

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://doi-ds.org/doilink/06.2023-39126398/COMPENSATION SCHEME

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN LEGAL SECTOR BY: A. TAIBAH FATHIMA

Authors: A. TAIBAH FATHIMA

Registration ID: 105791 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5791

Year : June -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: taibah.amjath2911@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://doi-ds.org/doilink/06.2023-63941353/ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

AN OVERVIEW OF GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS FOR INDIAN GOODS BY - RASHI MAKHIJA

Authors: RASHI MAKHIJA

Registration ID: 105790 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5790

Year : June -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: rashimakhija369@gmail.com

Page No : 26 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://doi-ds.org/doilink/06.2023-49636669/AN OVERVIEW OF GEOGRAPHICAL

LEGAL CONFINES OF CYBERBULLYING EXPLORING THE COUNTERACCUSATIONS AND COUNTERMEASURES BY - NISHIKA MIGLANI

Authors: NISHIKA MIGLANI

Registration ID: 105789 Published Paper ID: IJLRA5789

Year : June -2023 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: nishikamiglani@gmail.com

Page No : 21 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link: https://doi-ds.org/doilink/06.2023-15472444/LEGAL CONFINES

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] Gellner, E. (n.d.). (1991) The Com ing of Nationalism and Its Interpretation: The Myths of Nation and Class.

[2] Peter Friedlander, “Hinduism and Politics”, 70-71, in Routledge Handbook of Religion and Politics, ed. Jeffrey Haynes (Abingdon: Routledge, 2016)

[3] Francis Fukuyama, “The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution”, 159, (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011)

[4] Habib, “Nationalism in India: Past and Present.” Social Scientist, vol. 45, no. 3/4, 2017, pp. 3–8. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/26380341. [Accessed 2 Nov 2022]

[5] Chandra, “Secular and Democratic India on the Threshold of the New Millennium.” Social Scientist, vol. 27, no. 9/10, 1999, pp. 3–17. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3518099. [Accessed 9 Nov. 2022.]

[7] Chandra, “Secular and Democratic India on the Threshold of the New Millennium.” Social Scientist, vol. 27, no. 9/10, 1999, pp. 3–17. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3518099. [Accessed 9 Nov. 2022.]

[1] B. R. Sharma, Forensic Science in Criminal Investigation & Trials (5^th ed., Universal Law Publishing 2018).

[2] Dharam Deo Yadav v. State of UP, (2014) 5 SCC 509.

[3] Prachi Kathane, Anshu Singh, J.R. Gaur, & Kewal Krishan, The Development, Status and Future of Forensics in India, 2 Forensic Sci. Int'l (2020).

[4] Rupali K.Kulkarni & Dr.A.D.Gawande, Digital Forensics, 5 International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Engineering Research 333 (2017).

[5] Jeff Desjardins, How much data is generated each day? World Economic Forum (Apr. 4, 2023, 4:34 PM), https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/04/how-much-data-is-generated-each-day-cf4bddf29f/.

[6] The Information Technology (Reasonable security practices and procedures and sensitive personal data or information) Rules, 2011, Rule 3, Gazette of India, pt. II sec. 3(i) (Apr. 11, 2011).

[7] Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, No. 2, Acts of Parliament, 1974 (India).

[8] The Indian Penal Code, 1860, No. 45, Acts of Parliament, 1860 (India).

[9] Indian Evidence Act, 1872, No. 1, Acts of Parliament, 1872 (India).

[10] The Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[11] The Indian Penal Code, 1860, §29, No. 45, Acts of Parliament, 1860 (India).

[12] The Information Technology Act, 2000, §2(t), No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[13] The Information Technology Act, 2000, §43, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[14] The Information Technology Act, 2000, §66, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[15] The Information Technology Act, 2000, §69, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[16] Indian Evidence Act, 1872, §3, No. 1, Acts of Parliament, 1872 (India).

[17] Indian Evidence Act, 1872, §45A, No. 1, Acts of Parliament, 1872 (India).

[18] Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, §293, No. 2, Acts of Parliament, 1974 (India).

[19] State Of Himachal Pradesh v. Jai Lal, 1999 Supp(2) SCR 318.

[20] Mukesh v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi, AIR 2017 SC 2161.

[21] Indian Evidence Act, 1872, §65B, No. 1, Acts of Parliament, 1872 (India).

[23] Vikram Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 2017 SC 3227.

[24] B. R. Sharma, Forensic Science in Criminal Investigation & Trials (5^th ed., Universal Law Publishing 2018).

[25] K.K. Sindhu & Dr. B.B. Meshram, Digital Forensic Investigation Tools and Procedures, 4 I.J. Computer Network & Information Security 39 (2012).

[26] Rupali K.Kulkarni & Dr.A.D.Gawande, Digital Forensics, 5 International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Engineering Research 333 (2017).

[29] Rupali K.Kulkarni & Dr.A.D.Gawande, Digital Forensics, 5 International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Engineering Research 333 (2017).

[30] K.K. Sindhu & Dr. B.B. Meshram, Digital Forensic Investigation Tools and Procedures, 4 I.J. Computer Network & Information Security 39 (2012).

[31] Kharak Singh v. The State of UP, AIR 1963 SC 1295.

[32] R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1994) 6 SCC 632.

[33] People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. Union of India, (1997) 1 SCC 301.

[34] K.S Putthaswamy v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.

[35] The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2022 (India).

[36] Robin Verma, Digital Forensics 2.0: an automated, efficient, and privacy-preserving digital forensic investigation framework, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi (2018).

[38] K.S Putthaswamy v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.

[39] Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, §100, No. 2, Acts of Parliament, 1974 (India).

[40] Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, §93, No. 2, Acts of Parliament, 1974 (India).

[1] www.youtube.com. (n.d.). Tryst with Destiny | Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Independence Day Speech | 1947. [online] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Cudc5Mhlcc [Accessed 20 Apr. 2023].

[2] RAO, P.K. (1953). INDIA: THE REPUBLICAN DOMINION. Current History, [online] 25(148), pp.331–338. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/45308565?seq=1 [Accessed 25 Apr. 2023].

[3] De, R. (2020). Between midnight and republic: Theory and practice of India’s Dominion status. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(4), pp.1213–1234.

[4] theleaflet.in. (2019). Declaration as Republic of India in 1950 versus gaining of Independence in 1947: What’s the difference? – The Leaflet. [online] Available at: https://theleaflet.in/declaration-as-republic-of-india-in-1950-versus-gaining-of-independence-in-1947-whats-the-difference/ [Accessed 25 Apr. 2023].

[1] State of Bihar & Ors v. Subhash Singh, (1997) 4 SCC 430 : JT 1997 (2) SC 463

[2] Observed by Lord Wilberforce in the case of Rossminster Ltd., (1979) 52 TC 160 : (1980) I All ER 80 (p. 84 of 1 All ER)

[3] Wade’s Administrative Law, 8^th Edition (pg. 33 – 35)

[4] (1961) 41 ITR 191 (SC) : (1961) 2 SCR 241 : AIR 1961 SC 372

[5] Techspan India (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, (2007) 158 Taxman 182 (Delhi) : (2006) 283 ITR 212 (Delhi) : (2006) 203 CTR 550 (Delhi) affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Income Tax Officer v. TechSpan India (P.) Ltd., (2018) 92 taxmann.com 361 (SC) : (2018) 255 Taxman 152 (SC) : (2018) 404 ITR 10 (SC) : (2018) 302 CTR 74 (SC)

[7] (2005) 8 SCC 264. See also: State of H.P. and Others v. Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. and Another, (2005) 6 SCC 499.

[8] (1996) 100 STC 457 (P&H) : ILR (1996) 1 P&H 323

[10] Amar Nath Om Prakash v. State of Punjab AIR 1985 SC 218.; Haryana Financial Corporation v. Jagadamba Oil Mills (2002) 110 Comp. Cas. 20 (SC); Indian Charge Chrome Ltd. v. Union of India (2003) 2 SCC 533; Rekha Mukherjee v. Ashish Kumar Das AIR 2004 SC 443; General Electric Co. v. Renusagar Power Co. (1987) 4 SCC 137; Rajeswar Prasad Misra v. State of West Bengal AIR 1965 SC 1887; CIT v. K. Ramakrishnan (1993) 202 ITR 997 (Ker.)

[11] L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997) 3 SCC 261 : AIR 1997 SC 1125

[12] Engineering Professional Co. (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (2020) 115 taxmann.com 288 (Gujarat) : [2020] 424 ITR 253 (Guj)

[13] Jeans Knit P. Ltd. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Other (2014) 367 ITR 773 (Karn); Judgment rendered by the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in Joint Commissioner v. Kalanithi Maran (2014) 366 ITR 453 (Madras) also set aside.

[14] (2008) 12 SCC 675; See also: Genpact India (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (2019) 111 taxmann.com 402 (SC) : (2020) 268 Taxman 299 (SC) : (2019) 419 ITR 440 (SC)

[15] North Eastern Electric Power Corporation v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (2019) 104 taxmann.com 268 (Meghalaya) : (2019) 416 ITR 425 (Meghalaya); See also: Mrs. Kanchan Agarwal v. Income Tax Officer (2019) 106 taxmann.com 23 (Karnataka) : (2019) 263 Taxman 682 (Karnataka)

[16] Hanon Automotive Systems India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2019) 101 taxmann.com 514 (Madras)

[17] Kovalam Santhana Krishnan Mohan v. Income-tax-Officer (2017) 88 taxmann.com 239 (Madras) : (2018) 252 Taxman 289 (Madras) : (2018) 404 ITR 597 (Madras); Scan Holding (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT (2018) 90 taxmann.com 396 (Delhi); Home Finders Housing Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer (2018) 93 taxmann.com 371 (Madras); Raninder Singh v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Patiala (2019) 101 taxmann.com 210 (Punjab & Haryana) : (2019) 261 Taxman 214 (Punjab & Haryana)

[18] (2006) 287 ITR 1 (Bombay) : (2006) 206 CTR 401 (Bombay)

[19] (2007) 159 Taxman 330 (Delhi) : (2006) 287 ITR 337 (Delhi) : (2006) 205 CTR 569 (Delhi)

[20] (2004) 140 Taxman 381 (Delhi) : (2005) 274 ITR 186 (Delhi) : (2005) 193 CTR 84 (Delhi)_

[22] (2014) 44 taxmann.com 304 (Bombay) : (2014) 224 Taxman 13 (Bombay)(Mag.) : (2014) 362 ITR 403 (Bombay) : (2014) 267 CTR 228 (Bombay)

[23] (2015) 59 taxmann.com 333 (Bombay) : (2015) 233 Taxman 98 (Bombay) : (2015) 378 ITR 596 (Bombay)

[24] Jay Bharat Maruti Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (2013) 33 taxmann.com 361 (Delhi) : (2013) 215 Taxman 113 (Delhi)(Mag.) : (2013) 351 ITR 342 (Delhi) : (2013) 258 CTR 462 (Delhi)

[25] Pransukhlal Bros. v. Income-tax Officer (2015) 54 taxmann.com 327 (Bombay) : (2015) 229 Taxman 444 (Bombay)

²⁶. Techspan India (P.) Ltd.(supra)

[1] Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power, available at: http://www.un.org.

[2] Code of Criminal (Amendment) Act, 2008, Sec 2(wa)

[5] Smt. Bhavri Devi v. State of Rajasthan (1997) 1 WLC 42

[6] Mukesh and Anr v. State for NCT of Delhi and Ors. (2017) 6 SCC 1

[7] Government of India, Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System (Ministry of Home Affairs,2003) available at: http://mha.nic.in

[13] The declaration of basic principles of justice for victims of crime and abuse of power available at: http//www.un.org.

[14] Sexual Harassment of Woman at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.

[15] Sexual Harassment of Woman at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.

[2]The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 2(1) (g).

[3]Agreement on Trade - Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 1994, art. 22(1).

[4]The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 2(1) (f).

[5]Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Rights, 1883, art. 1(3).

[6]WIPO, “Frequently Asked Questions: Geographical Indications”, available at https://www.wipo.int/geo_indications/en/faq_geographicalindications.html.

[8]The Madrid Agreement for the Repression of False or Deceptive Indications of Source of Goods Act, 1891, art. 1(1).

[9]The Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration, 1958, art. 2(1).

[10]Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Rights, 1883, art. 10.

[11]Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Rights, 1883, art. 9.

[12] The Madrid Agreement for the Repression of False or Deceptive Indications of Source of Goods, 1891, art. 1(1); WIPO, The Madrid Agreement for the Repression of False or Deceptive Indications of Source, 1891, available at (https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_261.pdf).

[13]The Madrid Agreement for the Repression of False or Deceptive Indications of Source of Goods, 1891, art. 1(2); Supra.

[14] The Madrid Agreement for the Repression of False or Deceptive Indications of Source of Goods, 1891, art. 3(b).

[15]Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration, 1958, art. 3.

[16]Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration, 1958, art. 1.

[17]Dr. Varun Shukla, “Historical development of geographical indications law under International arena” 2 International Journal of India 01-04 (2016).

[19]Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 1994, art. 22.

[20]Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 1994, art. 23.

[21]Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 1994, art. 23(1).

[22]Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 1994, art. 23(2).

[23]Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 1994, art. 24.

[24]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 5.

[25]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 3.

[26]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 8(2).

[27]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 2(1)(n).

[28]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 2(1) (b).

[29]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 18.

[30]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 9(a).

[31]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 9(b).

[32]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 9(c).

[33]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 9(d).

[34]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 9(e).

[35]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 9(f).

[36]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 9(g).

[37]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 66.

[38]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 22(4).

[39]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 20(1).

[40]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 20(2).

[41]Scotch Whiskey Association & Others v. Golden Bottling Ltd., 2006 (32) PTC 656 (Del).

[42]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 50.

[43]Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, s. 24.

[45]Tea Board of India v. ITC Ltd., C.S. Number 250 of 2010, MANU/ WB/ 0277/ 20.

[46]GI Application Number 1 & 2, Application Details, Report on Darjeeling Tea, (http://ipindiaservices.gov.in/GIRPublic/Application/Details/2).

[47]GI Application Number 46, Application Details, Report on Kashmir Pashmina, (http://ipindiaservices.gov.in/GIRPublic/Application/Details/46).

[48]Sanjiv Singh “Geographical Indications; A Case Study of Kashmir Pashmina (Shawls)” 1 New Man International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies 97 (2014).

[49]GI Application Number 533, Application Details, Report on Banglar Rasogolla, (http://ipindiaservices.gov.in/GIRPublic/Application/Details/533).

[50]GI Application Number 612, Application Details, Report on Odisha Rasagola, (http://ipindiaservices.gov.in/GIRPublic/Application/Details/612).

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

THE CREATION OF THE APEX COURT: A LOOK INTO IT’S PAST AND PRESENT BY - PRATYUSHA GHOSH

EVIL LURKS IN THE SHADOWS: MARITAL RAPE BY - PRATYUSHA GHOSH

RELIGIOUS NATIONALISM IN CONTEMPORARY INDIA BY - TANMAY BANSAL

DIGITAL FORENSICS IN INDIA: CHALLENGE OF PRIVACY IN HANDLING DIGITAL EVIDENCE BY - BEVAN AVIL PINTO

THE DOMINION OF INDIA: A TAIL OF 1947-1950 BY - TANMAY BANSAL

IMPORTANCE AND EFFECT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW AGAINST ACTION FOR RE-ASSESSMENT – ANALYSIS AND STUDY OF EMERGING TRENDS BY - SANJAY BANSAL & DR. ANNU BAHL MEHRA

COMPENSATION SCHEME: A CRITICAL STUDY ON SURVIVORS OF SEXUAL OFFENCES BY - SHARDA & DR. AJEET KUMAR SINGH

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN LEGAL SECTOR BY: A. TAIBAH FATHIMA

AN OVERVIEW OF GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS FOR INDIAN GOODS BY - RASHI MAKHIJA

LEGAL CONFINES OF CYBERBULLYING EXPLORING THE COUNTERACCUSATIONS AND COUNTERMEASURES BY - NISHIKA MIGLANI

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2