Open Access Research Article
‘JURIS MEDICA NEXUS’: UNRAVELING MEDICO – LEGAL DYNAMICS IN INDIAN HEALTHCARE JURISPRUDENCE
Published Paper
Article Details
‘JURIS
MEDICA NEXUS’: UNRAVELING MEDICO – LEGAL DYNAMICS IN INDIAN HEALTHCARE JURISPRUDENCE
AUTHORED BY - VANSHIKA TEWARI
Amity Law
School Noida
vanshikatewari009@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
The article explores the intricate
relationship between India's healthcare sector and legal frameworks, detailing
its impact on healthcare quality, accessibility, and affordability. Governed by
a complex network of laws and policies, the sector aims to balance innovation
with patient rights.
Central to this relationship are key
laws such as the Clinical Establishments Act, Indian Medical Council Act, and
Drugs and Cosmetics Act. These laws ensure the maintenance of standards,
professional conduct, and safety in healthcare delivery, addressing crucial
aspects like facility registration, medical education, and drug regulation.
Furthermore, patient rights are
safeguarded by laws like the Consumer Protection Act, which establish
guidelines for informed consent, confidentiality, and grievance redressal.
These legal provisions empower patients and hold healthcare providers
accountable for any negligence or deficiency in services, fostering
transparency and patient safety.
In addition to domestic legal
frameworks, India's healthcare sector is influenced by international treaties
and guidelines, supporting initiatives like Ayushman Bharat aimed at universal
healthcare coverage. This highlights the interconnectedness of India's
healthcare policies with global standards and priorities.
The article emphasizes the
significance of medico-legal dynamics within Indian healthcare jurisprudence,
stressing the importance of compliance and addressing issues like medical
negligence. It traces the historical evolution of healthcare laws in India from
traditional practices to modern legal frameworks, highlighting the ongoing
efforts to adapt to contemporary challenges.
Comparative analysis with other
countries underscores India's emphasis on patient rights and medical ethics,
guided by professional bodies like the Indian Medical Association. This
comparative perspective provides insights into diverse approaches to healthcare
law globally, emphasizing the centrality of patient rights and medical ethics
across different contexts.
In conclusion, the article portrays
India's healthcare laws as vital components of the evolving healthcare
landscape, ensuring quality care and protecting patient rights. It underscores
the importance of legal frameworks in shaping healthcare delivery and
addressing emerging challenges in the sector.
KEY WORDS: Healthcare Sector, Regulations,
Transparency, Clinical Establishments Act, Medico - Legal, Compliance, Medical
Negligence, etc.
INTRODUCTION
The relationship between the Indian
healthcare sector and legal frameworks is a deeply intertwined and
multi-layered one, with far-reaching implications for the quality,
accessibility, and affordability of healthcare services in the country. This
relationship is governed by a complex web of laws, regulations, and policies
that aim to strike a balance between promoting innovation and growth in the
healthcare industry while simultaneously safeguarding the rights and well-being
of patients and healthcare professionals.
At the foundational level, the Indian
Constitution enshrines the right to health as a fundamental right under Article
21, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. This
constitutional provision serves as the bedrock upon which various legal
frameworks governing the healthcare sector are built. The Indian judiciary has
played a pivotal role in interpreting and expanding the scope of this right,
influencing the development of healthcare-related legislation and policies.
The primary legal framework governing
the healthcare sector in India is the Clinical Establishments (Registration and
Regulation) Act, 2010, which aims to regulate and standardize the operations of
clinical establishments across the country. This act mandates the registration
and compliance of healthcare facilities with prescribed standards, ensuring
minimum requirements for infrastructure, personnel, and service quality.
Additionally, it establishes mechanisms for grievance redressal and
accountability, thereby promoting transparency and patient safety.
Another crucial aspect of the legal
framework is the regulation of medical professionals and their conduct. The
Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, and its subsequent amendments, govern the
registration, education, and ethical practices of medical practitioners in the
country. This act establishes the Medical Council of India (MCI), responsible
for maintaining professional standards, overseeing medical education, and
enforcing disciplinary measures in cases of medical negligence or misconduct.
The Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940,
and its associated rules, form a comprehensive legal framework for the
regulation of drugs, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetic products in India. This act
ensures the safety, efficacy, and quality of drugs and medical devices,
safeguarding public health and preventing the circulation of substandard or
counterfeit products in the market.[1]
Patient rights and consumer
protection are also integral components of the legal framework governing the
healthcare sector. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019, and the Clinical
Establishments (Central Government) Rules, 2012, establish guidelines for
patient rights, including the right to informed consent, confidentiality,
access to medical records, and grievance redressal mechanisms. These legal
provisions empower patients and hold healthcare providers accountable for any
negligence or deficiency in services.
Furthermore, the legal framework
encompasses specific laws and regulations governing specialized areas of
healthcare, such as the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994,
which regulates organ transplantation procedures and prevents commercial
dealings in human organs. Similarly, the Biomedical Waste Management Rules,
2016, establish guidelines for the safe handling, treatment, and disposal of
biomedical waste, mitigating environmental and public health risks.
The relationship between the Indian
healthcare sector and legal frameworks is also shaped by policies and
initiatives aimed at promoting universal healthcare coverage and access to
affordable healthcare services. Programs such as the Ayushman Bharat Pradhan
Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PM-JAY) and the National Health Mission (NHM) are
backed by legal provisions and regulations that govern their implementation,
funding, and oversight.
In addition to domestic legal
frameworks, India's healthcare sector is also influenced by international
treaties, conventions, and guidelines, such as those established by the World
Health Organization (WHO) and other global health organizations. These
international instruments provide guidance on best practices, ethical
standards, and global health priorities, shaping the development of national
healthcare policies and regulations.
As the Indian healthcare sector
continues to evolve and face new challenges, such as the emergence of new
diseases, advancements in medical technology, and changing population
demographics, the role of legal frameworks becomes even more crucial.
Continuous review and updates to existing laws and regulations are necessary to
ensure that they remain relevant and responsive to the dynamic needs of the
healthcare industry while maintaining a robust system of checks and balances to
protect the rights and well-being of all stakeholders.
SIGNIFICANCE
OF THE MEDICO LEGAL DYNAMICS
The significance and relevance of
studying medico-legal dynamics within Indian healthcare jurisprudence are
profound and multifaceted. This interdisciplinary field encompasses the
intersection of medicine, law, and ethical principles as they apply to
healthcare in India, a nation with a rich tapestry of cultural diversity and
complex legal frameworks.
·
Understanding
Medico-Legal Responsibilities: Healthcare professionals in India operate within
a sphere where their decisions have legal implications. Knowledge of
medico-legal responsibilities is crucial to ensure compliance with laws and
regulations, such as the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Consumer Protection Act,
and the Medical Council of India’s (MCI) guidelines. This understanding helps
protect healthcare providers from legal liabilities and promotes the delivery
of ethical medical care.[2]
·
Patient
Rights and Informed Consent: The study of medico-legal dynamics is essential
for safeguarding patient rights. It involves comprehending the legalities
surrounding informed consent, a cornerstone of patient autonomy. Informed
consent is not just a procedural formality but a patient’s right, ensuring they
are aware of the risks, benefits, and alternatives to medical procedures.
·
Medical
Negligence and Malpractice: With the rise of medical negligence cases in Indian
courts, healthcare professionals must be well-versed in what constitutes
negligence and malpractice. Studying medico-legal dynamics equips them with the
knowledge to maintain high standards of care and avoid practices that could
lead to legal repercussions.
·
Confidentiality
and Privacy: Patient confidentiality and privacy are paramount in healthcare.
Medico-legal education emphasizes the importance of maintaining
confidentiality, understanding the legal exceptions, and navigating the
complexities introduced by digital health records and telemedicine.
·
Forensic
Medicine and Ethics: Forensic medicine is a critical component of medico-legal
studies. It involves understanding how medical knowledge is applied in legal
contexts, such as autopsies, age estimation, and injury analysis. Ethical
dilemmas often arise in forensic practice, making the study of ethics
inseparable from medico-legal education.
·
Healthcare
Policy and Legislation: The dynamic nature of healthcare laws necessitates
continuous learning. Studying medico-legal dynamics enables healthcare
professionals to adapt to new policies and contribute to the formulation of
legislation that impacts public health and the medical profession.[3]
·
Interdisciplinary
Collaboration: Medico-legal studies foster collaboration between legal experts,
medical practitioners, and policymakers. This interdisciplinary approach is
vital for addressing complex healthcare challenges, shaping policies, and
ensuring justice in medico-legal matters.
·
Public
Health and Safety: Understanding medico-legal aspects is crucial for public
health initiatives. It informs strategies for managing epidemics, natural
disasters, and bioterrorism threats, ensuring that responses are legally sound
and ethically justified.
·
Education
and Awareness: Medico-legal education raises awareness among healthcare
professionals about their legal duties and the rights of their patients. It
also empowers patients to understand their entitlements within the healthcare
system.
·
Global
Relevance: As India continues to engage in international medical tourism and
collaborations, knowledge of medico-legal dynamics aligns Indian healthcare
practices with global standards and expectations.
In conclusion, the study of
medico-legal dynamics in Indian healthcare jurisprudence is indispensable. It
ensures the delivery of competent, ethical, and legal medical services,
protects the rights of patients and healthcare providers, and contributes to
the overall integrity and advancement of the healthcare system in India. This
field of study is not only relevant for legal and medical professionals but
also for society at large, as it underpins the trust and efficacy of the
healthcare system.
HISTORICAL
ASPECT OF THE JURIS MEDICA
NEXUS IN
INDIA
The historical background of
healthcare laws and regulations in India is a rich tapestry that reflects the
country's diverse cultural, political, and social evolution. From ancient
times, when healthcare practices were intertwined with religious and
traditional beliefs, to the contemporary era of structured legal frameworks, India's
healthcare regulations have undergone significant transformations.
Ancient and Medieval Periods: The roots of healthcare in India can
be traced back to ancient texts like the Charaka Samhita and Sushruta Samhita,
which laid the foundation for Ayurveda, the traditional Indian system of
medicine. These texts not only provided medical knowledge but also ethical
guidelines for practitioners. During the medieval period, Unani medicine,
brought by the Persians and Arabs, also became prevalent.
British Colonial Era: The advent of British colonial rule
introduced Western medicine and led to the establishment of the first medical
institutions and hospitals in India. The British also enacted various public
health measures, particularly in response to epidemics like the plague and
cholera. However, healthcare services were primarily aimed at serving the
colonial administration and the armed forces. The British colonial era marked
the introduction of allopathic medicine and the establishment of Western-style
hospitals and medical colleges. This period also saw the implementation of
public health measures, albeit with a focus on serving the colonial
administration. The Indian Medical Degrees Act of 1916 was one of the early
attempts to regulate medical education.
Post-Independence Developments: After gaining independence in 1947,
India's healthcare system needed restructuring to serve its vast population.
The Indian Constitution adopted in 1950 included provisions for the state to
improve public health as part of the Directive Principles of State Policy. The
Indian Medical Council Act of 1956 regulated medical education and practice.
Subsequently, various laws such as the Drugs and Cosmetics Act of 1940 and the
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act of 1985 were enacted to control
the manufacture and distribution of drugs.
The Bhore Committee report of 1946
was instrumental in shaping the post-independence healthcare policy,
recommending the establishment of a national health service. The Pharmacy Act
of 1948 and the Nurses Act of 1947 were among the initial steps to regulate
healthcare professions.[4]
Contemporary Healthcare Legislation: In recent decades, India has seen a
proliferation of healthcare laws addressing various aspects of healthcare
delivery. The Consumer Protection Act of 1986 included healthcare services,
allowing patients to seek redressal for medical negligence. The Transplantation
of Human Organs Act of 1994 regulated organ donation and transplantation. The
National Health Policy of 1983, revised in 2002 and again in 2017, aimed to
provide directions for the growth of the healthcare sector.
The latter half of the 20th century
saw the introduction of specialized legislation to address specific areas of
healthcare. The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 legalized abortion
under certain conditions, while the Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques Act of 1994
aimed to prevent sex-selective abortions
Legal Responses to Public Health
Challenges: India's
legal system has been responsive to public health challenges. The HIV/AIDS Act
of 2017 is a notable example, providing rights to those affected by HIV and
AIDS. The Mental Healthcare Act of 2017 replaced the outdated legislation and
aligned with international standards, emphasizing human rights and modern
psychiatric care.
The Indian judiciary has played a
pivotal role in interpreting healthcare laws and shaping policies. Landmark
judgments have expanded the scope of the right to health, leading to judicial
activism that has sometimes filled the gaps in legislation or pushed for policy
changes.
Regulatory Bodies: Various regulatory bodies such as
the Medical Council of India (MCI), now the National Medical Commission (NMC),
and the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) play crucial roles
in overseeing healthcare standards and practices. The Dental Council of India
and the Indian Nursing Council are other examples of professional regulatory
bodies
Impact of Judicial Interventions: The Indian judiciary has
significantly influenced healthcare laws through landmark judgments. The
Supreme Court's recognition of the right to health' as part of the fundamental
'right to life' has had far-reaching implications for healthcare policies and
practices.
Healthcare in the Digital Age: With the advent of digital
technology, regulations have also adapted to new challenges. The Information
Technology Act of 2000, although not specific to healthcare, has implications
for patient data privacy and security. The Digital Information Security in
Healthcare Act (DISHA) is proposed to specifically address the digitalization
of healthcare data.
Challenges and Future Directions: Despite these developments, India
faces challenges like unequal access to healthcare, quality of care, and
regulatory enforcement. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has further highlighted
the need for robust healthcare laws and their effective implementation.
The government's response, including
the Epidemic Diseases (Amendment) Act of 2020, reflects the agility of India's
legal framework in addressing public health emergencies.
THE
CONCERNS INDIA IS FACING
Medico-legal issues in healthcare are
a growing concern, particularly in India where the healthcare system is under
immense pressure due to a large population and limited resources. The
intersection of medicine and law is complex, and the Indian legal system has
been evolving to address the challenges that arise within healthcare settings.
·
Medico-Legal Challenges in Indian Healthcare
The Indian healthcare system faces a
myriad of medico-legal challenges. These include issues related to patient
consent, medical negligence, confidentiality, and the right to information. The
Indian Penal Code (IPC) and various other statutes like the Consumer Protection
Act provide a framework for addressing these challenges, but the application of
these laws in the healthcare context can be problematic.
·
Consent and Medical Negligence
Informed consent is a fundamental
principle in healthcare. Patients must be fully informed about the risks and
benefits of medical procedures. However, in India, there is often a gap between
the theory and practice of informed consent. This gap can lead to litigation,
especially in cases where the outcomes of medical procedures are not favourable.
Medical negligence is another
significant issue. The Supreme Court of India has defined negligence as a
breach of a duty caused by the omission to do something which a reasonable man,
guided by those considerations which ordinarily regulate human affairs, would do.
Proving negligence can be difficult, and the burden of proof often lies with
the patient.
·
Confidentiality and the Right to Information
Confidentiality is a key aspect of
the doctor-patient relationship. However, with the advent of digital records
and the Right to Information Act, there are new challenges in maintaining
patient confidentiality while also ensuring transparency.
A review of the literature reveals
several studies that have examined medico-legal issues in the Indian context.
For example, a study published in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics reviewed
medico-legal issues related to hip and knee arthroplasty, including the causes
of litigation and the legal proceedings in India. Another critical survey of
the legal liability of medical professionals in India draws insights from
various sources to understand the legal liability within the healthcare system.[5]
·
Pattern of Medico-Legal Cases
Analysing medico-legal cases in India
reveals patterns and frequencies of cases, the errors and issues in medico-legal
reports, and the impact and outcomes of these cases. This analysis is crucial
for understanding the practical implications of medico-legal issues in
healthcare.
The literature on medico-legal issues
in Indian healthcare highlights the need for better education and awareness
among healthcare professionals regarding the legal aspects of their work. It
also underscores the importance of a robust legal framework that can adapt to
the changing landscape of healthcare in India.[6]
PEEK INTO
THE HEALTHCARE JURISPRUDENCE ACROSS DIFFERENT COUNTRIES
India
Indian healthcare jurisprudence is
characterized by a combination of British common law and traditional Indian
values. The Indian Constitution guarantees the right to health, but this right
is not absolute and must be balanced against other rights and resources.
Medical negligence is governed by both criminal and civil law, and there's an
increasing trend of medical litigation in the country.
United Kingdom (UK)
The UK's National Health Service (NHS)
is a publicly funded healthcare system. The legal framework emphasizes patient
rights and safety, with mechanisms for complaints and redressal. The UK has
strict regulations on medical negligence and consent, and the courts play a
significant role in shaping healthcare policy through judicial review.
United States of America (USA)
The USA has a complex healthcare
system with a mix of public and private funding. The legal system places a high
emphasis on individual rights, leading to a litigious environment with
significant medical malpractice suits. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) introduced
reforms aimed at expanding healthcare coverage and reducing costs.[7]
Italy
Italy provides universal healthcare
to its citizens and residents. The Italian healthcare system is regionally
organized, and the legal framework focuses on ensuring equal access to
healthcare services. Medical malpractice is addressed through both criminal and
civil proceedings, with an emphasis on patient rights.
France
France's healthcare system is
renowned for its efficiency and is predominantly funded by the government.
French healthcare jurisprudence includes strong protections for patient rights
and privacy. The system is less litigious than the US, with a more
administrative approach to medical negligence.
Israel
Israel offers universal healthcare,
and its legal system is influenced by both Jewish law and common law. The
country has specific laws governing patient rights, medical negligence, and
bioethics. Israel's legal framework is known for balancing religious beliefs
with modern medical practices.
Russia
Russia's healthcare system is
state-funded and provides free medical care to all citizens. The legal
framework is less developed compared to Western countries, with fewer instances
of medical litigation. However, recent reforms aim to improve quality and
accountability in healthcare.
Canada
Canada's healthcare system is
publicly funded and provides universal coverage. The legal framework emphasizes
accessibility and quality of care. Canadian healthcare jurisprudence deals with
medical negligence through a combination of common law principles and statutory
regulations.
When comparing these countries,
several key differences and similarities emerge:
·
Public vs. Private Funding: Countries like the UK, Italy, France, Israel, Russia, and
Canada have predominantly public healthcare systems, while the USA has a
significant private sector influence.
·
Patient Rights and Safety: All countries have legal frameworks that emphasize patient
rights and safety, but the extent and enforcement vary. The UK and France, for
example, have robust systems for addressing patient complaints.
·
Medical Negligence: The approach to medical negligence differs, with the USA known for its
high rate of litigation, while countries like France and Canada have more
administrative approaches.
·
Healthcare Reforms: Each country has undergone healthcare reforms to address contemporary
challenges, such as the ACA in the USA and recent quality-focused reforms in
Russia.[8]
While all aim to protect patient
rights and ensure quality care, the methods and effectiveness of legal
frameworks differ significantly. This comparative analysis highlights the
diverse approaches to healthcare law and the ongoing evolution of medico-legal
dynamics globally.
MEDICAL
ETHICS AND THE GLOBAL SCENARIO
Medical ethics is a critical aspect
of healthcare that deals with the values and judgments necessary for medical
practice.
United Kingdom (UK)
In the UK, medical ethics is guided
by the General Medical Council (GMC), which sets standards for professional
behavior. The British Medical Association (BMA) also provides comprehensive
ethical guidance to address various medical scenarios.
United States of America (USA)
The American Medical Association
(AMA) has established a Code of Medical Ethics that serves as a guide for
physicians to uphold the standards of professionalism and ethics in medical
practice.
Italy
Italy's medical ethics landscape has been
shaped by both the Italian National Bioethics Committee and the Italian Medical
Association, focusing on informed consent, patient rights, and ethical issues
in clinical trials.
France
French medical ethics is overseen by
the French National Consultative Ethics Committee for Health and Life Sciences
(CCNE), emphasizing patient rights, particularly in terms of informed consent
and confidentiality.
Israel
Israeli medical ethics bridges
religious and secular values, with a strong emphasis on the sanctity of life
and patient autonomy. The Israeli Medical Association provides guidelines that
reflect this unique blend of ethical considerations.
Russia
Russian medical ethics has evolved
significantly over the years, with current practices influenced by the
country's historical, cultural, and political context. The Russian Medical
Society and the Russian Bioethics Committee play key roles in shaping ethical
standards.
Canada
The Canadian Medical Association
(CMA) has a Code of Ethics and Professionalism that articulates the ethical and
professional commitments and responsibilities of the medical profession in
Canada.
Each country's approach to medical
ethics reflects its unique cultural, legal, and social contexts, with all
aiming to protect patient rights and ensure the integrity of medical practice.
CRITICAL
ANALYSIS
While the article provides a
comprehensive overview of India's healthcare laws and their impact on the
sector, there are several areas that warrant critical analysis. Firstly, despite
the existence of robust legal frameworks, implementation and enforcement remain
key challenges in India. The efficacy of laws in addressing issues like medical
negligence and ensuring patient rights often depends on effective enforcement
mechanisms, which may be lacking in some cases due to resource constraints or
bureaucratic inefficiencies.
Moreover, the article could delve
deeper into the socio-economic implications of healthcare laws in India. While
laws aimed at promoting universal healthcare coverage and protecting patient
rights are crucial, disparities in access to healthcare services and resources
persist, particularly among marginalized communities. Addressing these
disparities requires a holistic approach that goes beyond legal frameworks to
encompass broader socio-economic policies and initiatives.
Additionally, while the comparative
analysis with other countries provides valuable insights, it would benefit from
a more nuanced examination of the cultural, political, and institutional factors
that shape healthcare laws and practices across different contexts.
Understanding these factors is essential for identifying best practices and
potential areas for improvement within India's healthcare system.[9]
Overall, while India's healthcare laws
play a vital role in shaping the country's healthcare landscape, addressing
implementation challenges, addressing disparities, and fostering
interdisciplinary collaboration are essential for ensuring their effectiveness
in promoting equitable access to quality healthcare for all citizens.
CONCLUSION
The intricate interplay between
India's healthcare sector and legal frameworks underscores the critical
importance of robust laws and policies in shaping the country's healthcare
landscape. As detailed throughout the article, these legal structures serve as
the foundation for ensuring healthcare quality, accessibility, and
affordability while upholding patient rights and professional standards.
From the Clinical Establishments Act
to the Indian Medical Council Act and various consumer protection laws, India's
legal framework encompasses a wide array of regulations aimed at governing
healthcare practices, safeguarding patient interests, and promoting
transparency and accountability within the sector. Moreover, international
treaties and guidelines further influence India's healthcare policies, aligning
them with global standards and priorities, and supporting initiatives for
universal healthcare coverage.
The significance of medico-legal
dynamics cannot be overstated. These dynamics play a crucial role in ensuring
compliance, addressing medical negligence, and maintaining ethical standards in
medical practice. By tracing the historical evolution of healthcare laws in
India, from ancient traditions to modern legal frameworks, the article
highlights the country's ongoing efforts to adapt to changing healthcare needs
and emerging challenges.
In a comparative analysis with other
countries, India's emphasis on patient rights and medical ethics stands out.
Guided by professional bodies like the Indian Medical Association, India
strives to uphold ethical standards and protect patient interests within its
healthcare system.
REFRENCES
1. India: India's Healthcare Sector's
Ethical And Compliant ... - Mondaq. https://www.mondaq.com/india/healthcare/1371598/indias-healthcare-sectors-ethical-and-compliant-journey-to-success
2. Importance of Medical Law and Ethics
in Indian Healthcare. https://drarvindersingh.com/importance-of-medical-law-and-ethics/.
3. Code of Medical Ethics Regulations,
2002 | NMC. https://www.nmc.org.in/rules-regulations/code-of-medical-ethics-regulations-2002/.
4. A comparison of regulatory approval of
clinical trial protocol https://www.ijclinicaltrials.com/index.php/ijct/article/download/426/291.
5. Medical laws : A study of their
conflict with Ethics - iPleaders. https://blog.ipleaders.in/medical-laws-conflict-ethics/.
7. Stats On Medical Negligence Cases In
India In Comparison To Other Countries. https://www.delhimedicalnegligence.com/post/stats-on-medical-negligence-cases-in-india-in-comparison-to-other-countries
8. Cultural aspects of primary
healthcare in india: A case- based analysis https://apfmj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1447-056X-10-8.
9. Caring for Native Americans | Journal of
Ethics | American Medical Association https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/issue/caring-native-americans.
10. Legal Liability of Medical
Professionals in India: A Critical Survey https://www.ijarsct.co.in/Paper12767E.pdf.
[1] India: India's Healthcare Sector's
Ethical And Compliant , Mondaq, https://www.mondaq.com/india/healthcare/1371598/indias-healthcare-sectors-ethical-and-compliant-journey-to-success
[2][2] Makhani, C. S., Petkar, M. R.,
Chavan, K. D., & Rao, T. V. (2011). Awareness of medical ethics and
medico-legal issues amongst medical professionals. Indian Journal of Forensic
Medicine and Pathology, 4(4), 151-155.
[3] Paleakkara, A. (2021). Awareness
of Medico Legal Aspects of Clinical Practise and Common Medico Legal Issues
among Medical Graduates. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology,
15(1).
[4] Laxmisha, R. K., & Reddy, B.
S. (2021). A Critical Study of Law Relating to Medico Legal Litigations in
India (Doctoral dissertation, Alliance University).
[5] Tiwari, S. (2003). Medico Legal
Problem. Indian Pediatrics, 40, 1011-1013.
[6] Tiwari, S. (2003). Medico Legal
Problem. Indian Pediatrics, 40, 1011-1013.
[7] De Cruz, P. (2013). Comparative
healthcare law. Routledge.
[8] De Cruz, P. (2013). Comparative
healthcare law. Routledge.
[9] Pinto, E. P., & Pinto, E. P.
(2021). An Overview of Health Care Jurisprudence in India. Health Justice in
India: Citizenship, Power and Health Care Jurisprudence, 83-176.
Article Information
‘JURIS MEDICA NEXUS’: UNRAVELING MEDICO – LEGAL DYNAMICS IN INDIAN HEALTHCARE JURISPRUDENCE
Authors: VANSHIKA TEWARI
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2024/04/15
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.