JUVENILE DELINQUENCY AND CONTROLLING CRIME IN YOUTH - CAUSES AND PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES (By- Sheoshree Adhikary)
JUVENILE DELINQUENCY AND
CONTROLLING CRIME IN YOUTH - CAUSES AND PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES
Authored By- Sheoshree Adhikary
Abstract
Crime rate is day by day
increasing and the most shocking trend that can be noticed is that it is
upheaving among Juveniles too. Criminal cases of all sorts ranging from thefts
to murder or smuggling to sexual crimes are committed by them. A juvenileisa human
below the age of 18. We are constantly reminded that there are problems with
juvenile violence. Increasing levels of juvenile violence are a national
concern. Each year, millions of juveniles are arrested for delinquency, and
even more participate or are at risk of participating in acts of delinquency. Delinquents
face numerous challenges including the risk of incarceration, school drop-out,
drug use, and an increase in the likelihood of adult criminality. Numerous
programs that attempt to prevent delinquency have been an issue in society
since the colonial era. During this period, juvenile offenders were made to
serve the same punishment as an adult.
The purpose of the present research
is to evaluate the behavioural problems in delinquents and non-delinquents.
After a detailed literature review, it was hypothesized that the delinquent
children will score high on sensation seeking and aggression as compared to
non-delinquent children. Further, the delinquent children will have a history
of parental physical abuse, parental drug abuse, and school dropout as compared
to non-delinquents.
KEYWORDS: Causes, History, Judicial
Trends, Youth crime, Case Analysis.
Introduction
Juvenile Delinquency means the participation
of minors or young people in illegal activities. Various Legal systems in the
world have adopted specific procedures to deal with juvenile offenders such as
Juvenile Justice Courts, Observation Homes, etc. A Juvenile delinquent in India
is a person below the age of 18 and has committed an act prohibited under the
Indian Penal Code, 1860[1]
and otherwise would have been charged with the crime if they have been an adult.
Depending upon the severity of the crime and the state of mind of the juvenile
while committing the act, people under 18 can be tried as an adult. The word
Juvenile delinquency has been debated by psychologists, criminologists, and
even sociologists from time immemorial. Lots of people having contrasting and
concurring opinions have been focussing on the real cause, which can be
explained using different theories ranging from classical to modern ones. Philosophers
have come up with different explanations seeking to investigate these
tendencies of juvenile crime. Some have associated it with the aspects of race,
gender, and poverty that are depicted by poor socio-economic status, while
others have associated it with childhood events such as sexual abuse or other
forms of physical abuse. Peer group influence has also provided large surface
areas for juvenile crimes to flourish. There are socially based theories that
explain juvenile delinquency together in traditional and modern or advanced perspectives.[2]A
juvenile can be defined as a child who has not attained a certain age at which
he can be held liable for his criminal acts like an adult person.[3]There
is a difference between the term Juvenile and Minor. Though in common language
we use both the terms interchangeably ‘juvenile’ and ‘minor’ in legal terms are
used in a different context. The term juvenile is used concerning a young criminaloffender
and the term minor relates to the legal capacity or majority of a person. Thus,
a Juvenile is a child who is alleged to have committed certain acts or
omissions which are in violation ofany law and are declared to be an offense.
In recent times juveniles were found to be involved in most heinous crimes such
as murder and gang rape. Not all criminals reveal their criminality early in
life. Origins of criminal behaviour in childhood are a complex matter,
delinquency is reasonably predictable early in some children’s lives.Similarly,
antisocial behaviour in the form of juvenile delinquency is predictive of
adulthood crime. It seems evident,
though, that early problem behaviour should not be neglected for two reasons it
is predictive of later, more serious, problems and, if it is acted on, then
even simple interventions may be effective at reducing future delinquency.[4]
Juvenile delinquency is an emphasized, nebulas, legal and social label for a
wide variety of law and norm violating behaviours. Legally, a juvenile
delinquent commits an act defined by law as illegal and whom an appropriate
court adjudicates “delinquent”. The legal definition is usually restricted to
persons under 18, but states vary in their age distinctions.[5]
Delinquency is not a single entity – it is an enormous variety of different
behaviours. Behaviours element common to these behaviours as delinquent defines
them and they are committed by someone of juvenile age.[6]
Causes Of
Juvenile Delinquency
According to Wilson and Howell that
there is an increase in the chances that a juvenile will engage in behaviour
that can lead to delinquency. Risk factors include the availability of drugs or
firearms in the community, family conflict, a lack of commitment to school, and
friends who engage in problem behaviour.[7]
Studies on the problem of Juvenile deviation generally present two theoretical
perspectives. Sociology any Psychological. Even though psychology
and sociology focus on different aspects of crime (sociology stresses the
system, psychology the person), both disciplines concentrate their attention on
the theme of “control”. Psychology emphasizes the personal or inner
control that is determined by the superego other than by learned behaviour
patterns. Sociology pays attention to the society or community institutions
that have a direct effect on the processes of outward social control. According
to Reiss, deviation depends both on personal and social controls.[8]
The lack of personal and social control may result in crime involvement. There
is no doubt that the family is significant for both personal and social
control.
The causes of juvenile
delinquency may be classified under two major factors: (A) Social
factors, and (B) Personality factors.[9]
(A)
SOCIAL FACTORS
1. Broken Homes:
In one of the
studies conducted by Uday Shankar in India, 13.3% of the 140 delinquents came
from broken homes.The home may be broken up by the death of one or both of the
parents, or by prolonged illness or insanity, desertion, or divorce.
Interaction at home is a very important means ofsocializing the child.
2. Poverty:
A very large proportion of delinquent children come
from poor homes. They commit their offenses as members of gangs. Uday Shankar’s
study has revealed that as many as 83% of the children come from poor families.
Poverty compels sometimes both the parents to be outside the home for a very
long period to earn their daily bread. The children will be uncared for. Such
children may consciously or unconsciously join hands with gangsters and become
delinquents. This mostly happens in slum areas and areas in which mostly
working-class people live.
3. Companions and Gangs:
As the child grows older, he goes into the neighbourhood
and becomes a member of the playgroup or peer group. If by chance he joins the
group or the gang that fosters delinquent attitudes he is also likely to become
a delinquent. Offenses are also committed by adolescents due to bad
companionship. Studies have shown that delinquent acts are done in the company.
4. Beggary:
Beggary is often the cause of juvenile delinquency.
Child beggars mostly come from very poor families or broken homes. These
children are betrayed by the needed love and affection of their parents. They realize
that only through deviant practices, they can satisfy their desires and meet
their needs. They thus become delinquents.
(B)
Personal Or Individual Factors:
Personal
factors such as mental deficiency and emotional disturbances may also
contribute to juvenile delinquency.
1. Mental Deficiency in Delinquency:
It has been
observed that a good number of delinquents are mentally deficient. Studies have
revealed that there is a larger proportion of mental defectives in children. It
is quite natural to assume that the dull and mentally handicapped or defective
adolescents do not have the necessary insight to make distinctions between
‘right’ and ‘deviant’ methods and behaviour.’ Such children are often used by
the more intelligent children of the gang or the adults for their criminal
purpose.
2. Emotional Problems of the Individual:
Mental
troubles and emotional maladjustments are strong factors in delinquency.
Emotional problems of inferiority and jealousy are very common among delinquent
children. Thus, from the psychological point of view, “Delinquency is a
rebellion and an expression of aggression which is aimed at destroying,
breaking down or changing the environment”. This rebellion is mostly against
the social conditions which deny the individual his basic rights and the satisfaction
of his fundamental needs. Thus, delinquents are not born so, but they become so
due to social circumstances and personal deficiencies. They are mostly
emotionally maladjusted children who become delinquents to get the attention of
their parents or as a protest against their treatment. Thus, it may be said
that juvenile delinquency is the result of both social or environmental and
personal or individual factors.
Historical
Development Of Juvenile Justice Regime In India
Prior to 1850, there was no such
legislation enacted to look after the cases related to juveniles. In 1850, the
first legislation was passed in form of the Apprentice Act, this act
constitutes the provisions related to vocational training for convicted
children. Soon after that Indian Penal Code, 1860[10]
was passed according to which an absolute immunity was given to the child under
the age of 7 from criminal liability under section 82 whereas section 83
provides partial immunity to a child of the age group 7- 12 years. Above 12
years were treated as adults under this Act. But the threat was that sending
the children to the ordinary jail might result in bad consequences. Hence,
Reformatory School Act was enacted in 1897 which provided for the constitution
of Reformatory schools for young persons (boys not above 15 years). Further
Children Act, 1960 was enacted and various states enacted their local children
acts to deal with delinquency. The time demanded uniform law be enacted to
govern juvenile delinquency and hence in the year 1986 the Juvenile Justice Act
and which was recently amended in the year 2015 Juvenile Justice (Care and
Protection) Act which extends to the whole of India except the state of Jammu
and Kashmir. This act provided for the establishment of one or more juvenile
justice boards for exercising the powers and discharging its functions related
to children who are in conflict with the law. This act, passed in 2015 by Lok
Sabha has a new clause that if a juvenile of 16 years or above commits some
Heinous Crime, he may be tried as an adult. After the Juvenile Act 2015
important Act, Policies, Organizations came to the take initiatives for the
welfare of the children such as the Protection of Children from Sexual
Offences Act (POCSO), Child Labour(Protection and Regulation) Act, the
POCSO Amendment Act 2019,[11]United
Nations of the convention on the right of the child (UNCRC),[12]
National Child Labour Scheme, National Commission for Protection of Child
Rights.Recently, parliament passed the juvenile justice (care and Protection)
Amendment Act 2021 to provide strength to the provision of protection and
adoption of children. There are many adoption cases pending before the court
and to make proceedings of the court faster now the power is transferred to the
district magistrate. Previously adoption of the child is final on the issue of
adoption order by the civil court. Amendment provides that the district
magistrate has the authority to issue such adoption orders.The main role of the
Indian juvenile justice system is that children should not be tried in regular
courts and laws for juveniles made in a way that corrects them in all possible
ways. Most of the children who committed any crime come from poor or illiterate
families. The juvenile justice system focuses on the education of the children
instead of punishing them. The trial of the children is based on non-penal
treatment through social control agencies such as observation homes, special
homes, and special schools.[13]
Judicial Trends On Juvenile
Delinquency
The Supreme Court and various High
Courts play a vital role in the development of the Juvenile Justice System in
India. At the primary stage, the cases of the juvenile delinquent are dealt
with by the lower courts but their judgments being not binding on the other
courts are not able to reflect on any policy. So, the trends of the judicial
approach toward a juvenile in conflict with the law, reflected by the judgments
of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and various high courts are being examined. The
courts/ juvenile justice board are under statutory and Constitutional duty to
deal with the juveniles in conflict with the law who are produced or brought
before it. The competent authority in deciding the cases has to make a due inquiry
and give full opportunity to the juveniles to put their case not only at the
time of inquiry regarding the commission of offense he/she is charged with but
also at the initial stage of the case when the question of determination of
his/her age comes up before the court or the Board concerned. The problem of
child delinquency is a major problem faced by developing countries as well as
the developed country and it is increasing at a great pace. Even in small urban
and rural areas, the problem is growing rapidly and this problem if not taken
care of by providing preventive and remedial measures would destroy 'the child'
which is the future of a Nation. To tackle and deal with the problem the
Governments have established many courts and Boards for the implementation of
various laws enacted by the legislation. The courts have contributed a lot in
the fields of juvenile justice by interpreting various legislative enactments
enacted for the benefit of juvenile offenders.
Theoretical
Perspectives On Youth Crimes
The issue of human violence has been
vastly theorized in an attempt to explain violent behaviours, especially
amongst the youth. The emphasis has been on individual characteristics, mental
processes, and environmental and social influences. In this section, an attempt
is made to review some of the major psychological perspectives that have tried
to explain the etiologic of violence in young people. Delinquency is the result
of various factors interacting in a complex way to bring forth the resultant
aggressive acts. Largely two perspectives have been theorized for the cause of
youth crime:
1) Primary Factors, and
2) Secondary Factors.
·
Biological Perspectives on Youth Crimes
Research findings indicate that delinquency has a
moderate genetic heritability as indicated by a higher concordance rate for
delinquency seen between identical twins when compared with non-identical
twins. One study by Cadoret and colleagues (1995)[14]
showed that adopted children of biological parents with antisocial personality
disorder were more likely to develop conduct disorder if their adoptive parents
had exposed them to adverse environments than to normal environments.
Adolescence is also an age of various physiological changes that accompany
puberty. It is during this time that the young person attains sexual maturity.
Levels of hormones in the young body increase almost 10 times with a sharp
increase in levels of testosterone. Brain imaging allows us to understand that
adolescents are well aware of the risk and can accurately appraise risk-taking
behaviours such as drinking and driving, Consuming drugs, and unprotected
drugs. Thus, adolescence is a period where rewards of risk-taking become more
attractive, but, the capacity to control and regulate behaviour is still
developing.
·
The Psychological Perspective on Youth Crimes
The psychodynamic perspective brings
to focus the conflicts that emerge with the id- ego struggles and aggression
are seen as more of an id impulse which is normally under control but could
leak out in case the young adult has not learned appropriate ways of directing
such impulses.[15] The
weakness of the ego is unchanged because of dysfunctional relationships with
significant adults like parents or caregivers, and a lack of sublimation in
intellectual or social activities. Young adults who do not have an opportunity
to learn appropriate socialization processes from their early familial
environment either because they were abused, neglected, or exposed to violence
themselves are often unable to control their impulses and seek immediate
gratification. They also have trouble empathizing with others and feel no
remorse or guilt while hurting others.[16]
The psychodynamic perspective takes into account the early childhood
experiences as being important contributors to the make-up of a healthy ego.
·
Behaviour Perspective on Youth Crime
According to the behaviourists, all behaviour is a
result of conditioning and reinforcement including violence and aggression.
Young adults who engage in violence do so because of their earlier experience
with violence. These youth either have been directly exposed to some form of
aggression themselves or have observed significant others in their immediate
environment getting attention either positively or negatively or have
themselves been given such attention. It Is thus not uncommon to find violence
amongst youth who belong to neighbourhoods that are volatile themselves.[17]
Also, in research on social learning theory, Albert Bandura, a Stanford
University psychology professor, studied the nature of violence portrayed in
mass media and its influence on children.[18]
·
Personality Perspective on youth Crime
Personality can be broadly defined as those
characteristics of the person that accounts for consistent patterns of feeling,
thinking, and behaving. Seen amongst young children and adolescents these
traits appear around the age of eight years or more and are described under the
category of conduct disorder. These youngsters show disrespect to the law, and
the rights of others and show a deficit, in social behaviour. These children are
also caught lying, stealing, and engaging in aggressive acts like cruelty to
animals, vandalizing property, bullying other children, and committing other
criminal acts and even homicide. Young teenagers could be involved with sexual
promiscuity and drug use and abuse.
·
Social and Environmental Factors into Youth Crimes
The age of adolescents involves transitions between
childhood and adulthood where significant biological, psychological, and social
changes are occurring. During this time the youth is faced with numerous
conflicts. They have to learn to deal with parental expectations, make new
adjustments to the various social demands, and be part of a group.[19]
Case Analysis
1. Juvenile Convict to Be Let Off with
Fine In 22-Years Old Murder Case[20]
The question before the Supreme Court was whether the
accused should be tried as a juvenile under the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 as
it then prevailed when the crime was committed as those under 16 years were
termed juvenile under the act.Sentenced to life for murder 22 years ago, a man
will now be set free by a local juvenile court in Madhya Pradesh on payment of a
fine after the Supreme Court concluded that the convict was a juvenile at the
time of the commission of the crime.For all these years, the accused made no
whisper about his juvenility before the trial court or the Madhya Pradesh high
court, which returned consistent findings of guilt against the man, holding
that he along with his father Devi Lal and brother Gokul killed one Ganeshram
due to enmity. In May 1999, the trial court at Neemach, MP, sentenced the three
accused to life imprisonment for murder and under various provisions of the
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Following
this, the Madhya Pradesh high court September 2006 upheld this ruling.The trio appeared
in the Supreme Court in 2007 but the plea of juvenility of one of the accused
was raised for the first time a decade later in 2017. The top court in October
2018, directed the sessions Judge, Neemach to hold an inquiry into this aspect.
Based on the inquiry, the accused was found to be aged 16 years and 11 months
on the date of the incident, i.e., July 19, 1998. The question before the
Supreme Court was whether the accused should be tried as a juvenile, under the
Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 as it then prevailed when the crime was committed as
those under 16 years were termed juvenile under the act. The accused did not
fall in this category as he exceeded the age limit. In the year 2000, this bar
was lifted to 18 years.Section 20 of the modified act provided, “all
proceedings in respect of a juvenile pending in any court in any area on the
date on which this Act comes into force in that area, shall be continued in
that court as if this act had not been passed and if the court finds that the
juvenile has committed an offense, it shall record such finding and instead of
passing any sentence in respect of the juvenile, forward the juvenile to the
board which shall pass orders in respect of that juvenile in accordance with
the provisions of this act.”Following this law, the bench of justices UU Lalit,
Indira Banerjee, and KM Joseph held, “Even while holding the appellant to be
juvenile in terms of the 2000 act and guilty of the offense with which he was
charged, we set aside the sentence of life imprisonment imposed upon him and
remit the matter to the jurisdictional Juvenile Justice Board for determining the
appropriate quantum of fine that should be levied on the appellant.”
At present, there are large numbers of people in the
society who are demanding that juveniles in the age group of 16 to 18 years
should be treated as adults as far as their conviction in heinous crimes such
as rape, gang rape, murder, dacoity, etc. is concerned.
Prevention
And Early Intervention
Typically, juvenile delinquency
follows a trajectory similar to that of normal adolescent development. In other
words, children and youth tend to follow a path toward delinquent and criminal behaviour
rather than engaging randomly.[21]
Research has shown that there are two types of delinquents,
·
those
in whom the onset of severe antisocial behaviour begins in early childhood, and
·
those
in whom this onset coincides with entry into adolescence.[22]
In either case, these developmental
paths give families, communities, and systems the opportunity to intervene and
prevent the onset of antisocial behaviours and justice system involvement.
Early
Intervention
In light of the growing body of
research, we now know that the better and more cost-effective place to stop the
“cradle to prison pipeline” is as close to the beginning of that pipeline as
possible. Early intervention prevents the onset of delinquent behaviour and
supports the development of a youth’s assets and resilience.[23] While
many past approaches focus on remediating visible and/or longstanding
disruptive behaviour, research has shown that prevention and early intervention
are more effective.[24]
In addition to societal and personal
benefits, research has demonstrated that delinquency prevention programs are a
good financial investment. For example, a 2001 Washington State Institute for
Public Policy (WSIPP) study found that the total benefits of effective
prevention programs were greater than their costs. In essence, intervening
early “not only saves young lives from being wasted,” but also prevents the
onset of adult criminal careers and reduces the likelihood of youth becoming
serious and violent offenders. This in turn reduces the burden of crime on
society and saves taxpayers billions of dollars.[25]
The most effective way to
prevent juvenile delinquency has indisputably been to assist children
and their families early on. Numerous state programs attempt an early
intervention, and federal funding for community initiatives has allowed
independent groups to tackle the problem in new ways. The most effective
programs for juvenile delinquency prevention share the
following key components:
·
Education
Model programs have assisted families
and children by providing them with information. Some programs inform parents
on how to raise healthy children; some teach children about the effects of
drugs, gangs, sex, and weapons; and others aim to express to youth the innate
worth they and all others have. All of these programs provide youths with the
awareness that their actions have consequences. This is particularly important
in an era where youth are barraged with sexual and violent images. Educational
programs have the underlying intent of encouraging hope and opening up
opportunities for young people.
·
Recreation
One of the immediate benefits of
recreational activities is that they fill unsupervised after-school hours. The
Department of Education has reported that youths are most likely to commit
crimes between 2 p.m. and 8 p.m., with crime rates peaking at 3 p.m. Recreation
programs allow youths to connect with other adults and children in the
community. Such positive friendships may assist children in later years. Youth
programs are designed to fit the personalities and skills of different children
and may include sports, dancing, music, rock climbing, drama, karate, bowling,
art, and other activities.
·
Parent-Child Interaction Training Program
The "Parent-Child Integration
Training Program" takes parents and children approximately 12 weeks to
complete. It is designed to teach parenting skills to parents of children ages
two to seven who exhibit major behavioural problems. The program places parents
and children in interactive situations. A therapist guides the parents,
educating them on how best to respond to their child's behavior, whether
positive or negative. The program has been shown to reduce hyperactivity,
attention deficit, aggression, and anxious behaviour in children.
·
Bullying Prevention Program
The Bullying Prevention Program is
put into place in elementary and junior high school settings. An anonymous
student questionnaire fills teachers and administrators in as to who is doing
the bullying, which kids are most frequently victimized, and where bullying occurs
on campus. Once teachers and administrators have learned about how and where
bullying occurs at their school, they set up class rules and facilitate
discussions that address the problem. Individual bullies and victims receive
independent counselling. The program succeeds in creating a safer, less hostile
environment for students at a minimal cost.
·
Prevention Programs Within the Juvenile Justice System
A youth entering the Juvenile
Justice System has the opportunity to receive intervention assistance from
the state. In the care of the state, youth may receive drug rehabilitation
assistance, counselling, and educational opportunities. The success of the Juvenile
Justice System is measured by how well it prepares youth to re-enter the
community without committing further crimes. Optimally, all juvenile detention
facilities would catch youths upon their education, provide them with job
training, give them the experience of living in a safe, stable environment and
provide them with assistance to break harmful habits.
·
Ending Repeat Offenses
Once out of detention, youths face
the challenge of readjusting to a "free" life. For many, youth
detainment places a halt on a pattern of destructive behaviour. Once out of
prison, the youth must create a pattern of life separate from criminal
activity. To assist in this process, courts have attempted to implement helpful
social services for former inmates and their families. Some of these are job
placement, school follow-up, extended counselling, and extended drug rehab.
Conclusion
And Suggestion
Juvenile Delinquency and the problems related to it
have been faced by all societies, all over the world, however, in the developing
world, the problems are all the more formidable. The process of development has
brought in its wake a socio-cultural upheaval affecting the age-old traditional
ways of life in the congenial rural milieu. Juveniles are adversely affected by
changing conditions. At the same time, the traditional social control system
that served as a preventive check against any antisocial activity is gradually
giving way. Consequently, the problem of juvenile deviance and antisocial
propensities is rearing its ugly head – a situation that needs to be checked.
Offenders usually the yearning to commit crimes when they are young, hence it
constitutes a very good opportunity to confront their immorality, as children
are more flexible and can easily be formed into positive characters. An
exception could also be made especially for this crime that they’ll be punished
the same as adults because ties height of crime cannot be ignored.
Efforts to
combat juvenile offending have to work at various levels. Primary prevention
programs employ strategies to identify and treat personal problems and
disorders before they translate into criminal behaviour. On the other hand,
Secondary prevention efforts should focus on the psychological treatment of
youth offenders.
Children are born selfless and crime-free,
it is the surroundings of the society which inculcate crime in them. It is
necessary that there should be proper development along with proper
availability of resources, equal opportunity, and a healthy atmosphere for the
children to grow up with crime-freeminds.